Jump to content

Estate Agents which one???????


coop's

Recommended Posts

I know there are lots of threads already on this site about this, but i wanted to hear from anyone who has used them and which one was the best or worst?


I've had a walk up and down but there are far to many to go into, has anyone got any advice?


thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had realistic, decent service from Winkworth. But no doubt there'll be someone along in a New York minute to say, "Never Winkworth".



I switched to DVR from Winkworth



There you go. Personal recommendation is nearly useless in this area as so much is down to chance as well as the efforts of any one agent. You will have to go with what suits you, a combination of personal chemistry, gut feeling and prejudice, as do we all.


Insist on a short "sole vendor" period though. Gets them moving and means you can change whenever you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also check who will actually be conducting the viewings. This is where I fell down. The person who comes round to see you won't necessarily be the person selling your flat. So you'll get smooth talked and think that person is a good salesperson - and then some office junior shows round 5 people at once and doesn't do any more than open the door and let them in.


This doesn't happen at DVR, however, hence the switch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used Wates in Dulwich village. They actually worked pretty hard for us when the vendor was being particularly difficult.

We used them previously for lettings (they sort of acted as an intermediary as they don't normally do lettings) and again were fine.

Considering the horror stories I've had over the years renting all over london, it was a nice change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We too used Wates (ED) to let our house last year, and we were lucky enough to get a fab tenant paying top whack through the Village branch. (?200 pm more rent* than we had been quoted by Winkworth, Bushells and Haart). Whilst this was great, we felt that communication between the branches was pretty poor. Once they'd got their share of the money, every time we rang them they tried to palm us off with the other branch. But overall, it was worth it for the extra dosh. Mind you - it was a pretty straightforward deal, and they weren't really tested to any major extent.


*Cleary achieved due to the exposure in the village I assume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks loads guys i've had a chat with wates and it's come down to them and ludlowthompson and bushells, it's so competive. This is the first time i've sold and it's like being a duck in shooting season. Has anyone used Ludlow or bushells??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a buyer...


Winkworth. Very good and friendly, but rely on part-timers on Saturdays. Apart from that (which is better than not having enough staff) they have impressed the most.

Burnett, Ware and Graves. Really quite good. Have stayed in touch and got properties out to me.

Wates. Better than average. Good at emailing properties.

KFH. Pretty good.

DVR. Have tried to get to know us, but don't really have enough properties at our range at the moment.

Acorn. OK, though a bit distant.

Roy Brooks. Average. Very friendly.

Bushells. Little contact after registration.

Ludlow. Not very proactive. Rely on their (rather good, admittedly) email and sms updates.

Foxtons. Haven't heard a peep since registering.


I'm dependent on alerts from Rightmove, Findaproperty and Fish4. If you wait on estate agent you will miss out.


As a seller, I can't say that I am too impressed with Foxtons so far. I suspect my experiences as a buyer might explain to some extent why...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm dependent on alerts from Rightmove, Findaproperty and Fish4. If you wait on estate agent you will miss out.


You make a very good point Loz. Once you've registered with the various agents it's worth having a regular trawl through the propertyweb with your specific criteria and then follow up with a call to the relevant agent for a viewing. Stock will always vary between agents and after a while the agents will get to know you better and hopefully call you first when a property comes up but is not yet marketed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not wanting to start another 'all estate agents are angels of saten' topic, i've just managed to avoid dealing with the whole lot of them and dealt direct to a landlord to rent my new flat.


Unfortunately the agents have the lions share of choice, but the constant bending of the truth and economy with the facts led to me becoming very cynical about them.


(I'm actually being rather measured in my opinion of estate agents right now...)


There are plenty of ways to get direct access to landlords / property sellers without having to deal with 'middlemen' who

will happily take their cut without baring any responsibility. ('Gumtree' is a good website to start with...)


The ones have dealt with in the past have been friendly enough, after all we're all human and it's not as though they're arms dealers or anything, but in my experience many of them have been sadly lacking in terms of professionally dealing with, what is after all an important transaction.


Quite frankly they're all much of a muchness really...


It depends on what approach you want to take; deal with a intermediary, or do some extra research and deal direct to the person you're actually doing the deal with...


Just my humble etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit of an essay I'm afraid, but I happen to have views on your top two...


We sold a few years ago through Bushells and weren't very impressed. They were very positive and upbeat when we went in to sign up, but then it all went a bit wrong when we got to viewings. The flat was empty, as we'd already had to move, so we relied on them completely to do viewings. At first, despite quoting lots of great figures and telling us how many people they had on their books waiting for a flat like ours, absolutely nothing happened. When they did start showing people round the agent, apparently working for us and certainly paid by us, kept pointing out a non-existent "funny smell" to people and warning them about damp in victorian flats - we had provided a recent damp survey showing no damp. When we eventually got a offer, a lot lower than the asking price and we weren't being greedy I promise, they acted like we should be really grateful for anything. Oh and if I remember rightly the buyer was a friend of one of the agents - what a lucky coincidence. Throughout the whole process I had to ring them constantly to get updates and never got call backs when requested. I felt the whole time like they were working for the buyers not us.


When we bought our current flat it was through Ludlow Thompson and we were really happy with them. We had the same named contact throughout and he was friendly, straight forward and always rang when he said he would. Towards the end things got a bit sticky, because our solicitor was advising us to hold out on a couple of legal things. The agent obviously had a duty to chase us a bit, but was never less than totally professional and polite. Just recently, over a year later, I had to ring them about a sale board still on our building. By chance I got the same guy on the phone. He recognised my voice, remembered my name, a few details about us and where we lived. He got the board down the same day and called back two days later, without needing to take my number again, just to check it had come down. Very happy with them.


So, my two pence worth is Ludlow Thompson - hope it helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did you deal with the office manager at bushells?Never met

such a unpositive person in my whole life



annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bit of an essay I'm afraid, but I happen to have

> views on your top two...

>

> We sold a few years ago through Bushells and

> weren't very impressed. They were very positive

> and upbeat when we went in to sign up, but then it

> all went a bit wrong when we got to viewings. The

> flat was empty, as we'd already had to move, so we

> relied on them completely to do viewings. At

> first, despite quoting lots of great figures and

> telling us how many people they had on their books

> waiting for a flat like ours, absolutely nothing

> happened. When they did start showing people round

> the agent, apparently working for us and certainly

> paid by us, kept pointing out a non-existent

> "funny smell" to people and warning them about

> damp in victorian flats - we had provided a recent

> damp survey showing no damp. When we eventually

> got a offer, a lot lower than the asking price and

> we weren't being greedy I promise, they acted like

> we should be really grateful for anything. Oh and

> if I remember rightly the buyer was a friend of

> one of the agents - what a lucky coincidence.

> Throughout the whole process I had to ring them

> constantly to get updates and never got call backs

> when requested. I felt the whole time like they

> were working for the buyers not us.

>

> When we bought our current flat it was through

> Ludlow Thompson and we were really happy with

> them. We had the same named contact throughout and

> he was friendly, straight forward and always rang

> when he said he would. Towards the end things got

> a bit sticky, because our solicitor was advising

> us to hold out on a couple of legal things. The

> agent obviously had a duty to chase us a bit, but

> was never less than totally professional and

> polite. Just recently, over a year later, I had to

> ring them about a sale board still on our

> building. By chance I got the same guy on the

> phone. He recognised my voice, remembered my name,

> a few details about us and where we lived. He got

> the board down the same day and called back two

> days later, without needing to take my number

> again, just to check it had come down. Very happy

> with them.

>

> So, my two pence worth is Ludlow Thompson - hope

> it helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted curtains to be relined or  ready made curtain linings to be fitted to my favourite curtains.  please send me a private massage if you can help.   Thank you
    • What I don't understand is those that are clamouring for this says there is an urgent need for more teachers yet they also say there are lots of places at schools for the children leaving private school due to dwindling pupil numbers (at primary especially). Surely then the teacher "gap" can, in part, be plugged by this?   This does seem a very blinkered, dog whistle attack on a certain part of private education and it will be interesting to see how the courts (and Europe) views it. Given the government accelerated the rollout to happen in the middle of a school year (which no-one thought was a good idea) probably shows they may not believe they are on strong ground - it feels like a "beg for forgiveness rather than ask for permission" situation.
    • I have tried Ancestry (library) and Findmypast (library and paid). They both pay for archives to digitise some of their holdings. Forget details, Both has things other doesn't but think Ancestry is ahead. I found the search facility frustrating - you needed to play with options a lot.   My dad did research before these sites existed which was harder work but more fun. I recall instances where Ancestry made wrong assumptions (something like mire than one John and Joan Walker in same town).  
    • 01102528 and 01902663 are the two linked Police crime report numbers associated with the individual in the photos.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...