Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My little girl is 13 weeks old and has been waking every 1-2 hours throughout the night for the past 8 nights. Until then she has always been very good, usually waking twice at night for a feed.


At first I just put it down to being the 3 month growth spurt but I've noticed that she doesn't seem to always be hungry when she wakes and she isn't feeding any more often during the day.


At first I was feeding her every time she woke but often she would just fall back to sleep on me straight away. She seems quite happy to just be held. Sometimes once settled she will go back down and fall asleep for another hour or so, and sometimes she squeals as if she is in discomfort when I put her down.


One thing that has changed is her bowel movement pattern (this has changed every few weeks since birth). She is currently just doing a poo once a day and it is during the middle of the night at the moment, usually between 3 and 6am.


It occurred to my sleep deprived brain today that she might be waking as she is in discomfort having not done a poo all day. She does seem to settle and sleep well for three hours or so once she has done the poo.


I just wondered if anyone else has anyexperience of this and how it was resolved? I could just wait and hope the pattern changes again soon, but I wondered if there was any way of me encouraging her to poo during the day or in the evening before she goes to bed.


Thanks for any advice

Are you breastfeeding? Feeding actually encourages them to poo then and there... but if she is pooing regularly at night ther emight be a bit of day/night confusion that you could improve a little by having it bright in the day, dark at night etc, bath before bed (you prob do that alreaxy)


Ad a baby gets older its sleep patterns change. newborns drop straight into deep sleep, later on they get adult sleep patterns, cming into light sleep every 45-90 mins. It sounds like she is waking every time she comes into light sleep. Now is the time to encourage her to self settle if possible and encourage sleep associations (use of a mobile, blankie, quiet music etc


Also (re brain development/wonder weeks/sleep regression)


http://moxie.blogs.com/askmoxie/2006/02/qa_what_are_sle.html


http://blogginaboutbabies.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/wonder-week-19/

Hi Fuschia

Thanks for replying.


That sounds like it could be the problem. I have the wonder weeks book but didn't think she was at the 19week stage yet but if they start preparing for it in advance then that could also be a contributing factor.


Yes she is breastfed and we do differentiate between night and day. Though we only give her a bath every second night as I was worried about drying out her skin (she likes to spend ages playing in the bath!)


I'll read up on helping them settle through the sleep cycles.


Thanks again.

Mine is 18 weeks old and also waking every 1-2 hours through the night. We had been using a dummy to settle her but having been up every hour last night to replace the dummy we're ditching them. Have just spent 1.5 hours trying to settle her without a dummy though to no avail. Not sure what to do now. Is desperately hard - you both have all my sympathies!
I just have mine next to me in bed so although he wakes frequently my sleep isn't too disrupted. Have done that with all mine and it works for us though the evil day arrives eventually when the night time milk bar has to close and (oddly!) toddlers aren't so happy at the news... for now though new baby F and I are muddling along quite happily.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...