Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mine is dead too and has been since yesterday. There's nothing reported on the BT outage page here: http://btbusiness.custhelp.com/app/service_status


It's a nightmare trying to get hold of anyone at BT but I managed to get someone to call me by going via the Live Chat option here (I'm at work!) http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact/c/761,874,875 They were getting "inconclusive results" when they tested the line and promised to call me back later. Let's see!


Mine's an 8299 number - has anyone had problems with a different one?

Chesterfield Grove also dead since yesterday.


Had a text from BT saying Monday at 5pm is their SLA deadline. Be surprised if they don't see it as more urgent than that with the number of people affected. They have also promised regular SMS updates, will post anything I get on here.


Also, on a separate BT related topic, I just discovered that BT provide CallerID for free if you sign up for BT Privacy (which blocks sales calls!).

We have had conflicting messages about what the problem is - first we were told that a cable had been cut through and then we were told that part of the cable had been stolen!


Bit of nightmare trying to run a solicitors office without phones or e-mails. If anyone who is reading this has been trying to get in contact with Glazer Delmar then we have a couple of mobile numbers that you can contact to leave a message to ask us to phone you back 07852 412557 or 07956 342177

The BT Openreach van has been parked on Lordship lane since yesterday (just south of the Mag)- when I passed it late yesterday afternoon they were pumping a load of water out of a manhole- can't tell what they're up to right now, but there are now two vans and a lorry, and they seem to be setting up some weird looking equipment.


Crocodiles in the drains chewing the cables?

They may be pumping out the cable chamber just to get access to it - sometimes the chambers can get flooded without causing a service interruption - (and they also can fill with gas). Telephone cable (where it isn't fibre, which mainly it isn't in the local network) is made of copper - which has a high scrap value as its quality is very high. The London-Birmingham micro-wave link was paid for (common myth at least has it) by the pulled copper which it replaced. I am not surprised to hear that cable (or a section of it) could have been stolen - if it has been it makes repair much more time consuming - as it requires two sets of joints to be made (linking a replacement length of cable to each of the two cut ends) - rather than just jointing the cut ends together (when no cable length is missing). There are may be also be problems pulling replacement cable if the ducts are already quite full - as they may be around ED. Some telephone infrastructure in London is now 100+ years old - in ED probably 80-90+.


BT normally offers rental rebates where service has been interrupted like this - not that that's much of a consolation to those without land-line access.

I spoke with the Openreach guys today. They confirmed that they a laying a replacement 2000pair cable to replace the damaged one thieves tried to nick. Would you believe it the thieves cut the cable opposite East Dulwich Police station.


How long does it take to join 2000 pair in two places? About 3 days.

If you're lucky your line is back tomorrow. But don't count on it.

Penguin68, you really know your stuff and thanks for this info (not being sarcy).


irata, thanks for finding that out too.


I was told will be fixed by 6pm today but if it has been vandalised then there is nothing more we can do than wait and moan to BT.


Having back up lines with other providers helps though.

Just got an impromptu visit from a BT engineer, he needed to verify which physical connection outside was mine before it could be diverted at exchange. He said it would be back on later today.

Copper hit an all time high price earlier this year, BT engineer said armed gangs steal these cables so it's a serious business.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...