Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moving him may make the remainder of the Charlie's life more tolerable for his parents but the process may cause suffering for Charlie - possibly lines, tubes, pumps being removed & reinserted into his tiny body. Being moved from hospital to car/ambulance then to home. The change in environment, smells, sounds at home could be distressing for him after so long in hospital.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do some volunteering where transport is often

> provided by the Jimmy Mizen Foundation - a

> teenager sadly stabbed to death ten years ago. It

> makes me sad when I see his face on the mini bus

> but at the same time the family have made

> something good out of this.

> http://forjimmy.org/tag/charity/

>

> How much money is being spent on this case? The

> money could be spent on supporting research into

> the disease or something else to commemorate the

> short life of this poor soul


I agree that the money would be better spent on ensuring the parents have health babies in future now that they know that they are both carriers.

Just to correct you m

(Unfortunately Jimmy Mizen was killed with a glass dish in a bakers shop- the lad that did it was stabbed in prison- a lad I taught when he was 13 and there were concerns raised about him in school at the time....)

Hey loz your right, how weird, it def was not what is coming up now on link, i clicked onto it after

I posted it, whether it was reported wrongly, no surprise there.


srisky If they can move him to a hospice, which has been offered, and from what i read earlier this seemed likely, although It is no longer on link. I can't see how it would be any different.

Dulwichfox he may not have any concept of surroundings but I believe the bond with his parents is there, if he does not make the journey, then it must be remembered that the reality is death whatever. We do not know once the ventilator is turned off how long Charlie will last. There is an assumption it will be immediately. The things is they cannot say 100% that is how it will be. In a situation like this there needs to be understanding and people who you have good communication with, who respect the family enough to stay in the background unless needed. I have found it is suffice to have a nurse who can administer anything that's needed. This all needs to be discussed beforehand. The time for spscialist has passed.

This seems to be rapidly descending into a horrible farce.


The parents still can't come up with an acceptable plan. They seem to be grudgingly accepting of the hospice, but want the feeding tube to stay in for 'a week or so'. They say they've found a suitable doctor, but there are question marks over his experience in palliative care.


Seems the parents are trying desperately to stretch out the process for as long as possible. Understandable, but is it really in the little one's best interest? I'm not sure it's even in the parent's best interests.

Thanks Loz


There has been a breakdown with parents and Gosh and there has probably not been a day for a long time when the parents have not felt the fight. Gosh

did say when the parents withdrew there fight for

Treatment that the ventilator would not immediately

be turned off and hoped to give the family some time. Maybe once out of hospital the parents will find peace with there baby and let him go.

(I've had enough now- it's 'their' baby 'their' fight....).

I dearly hope someone has explained to the parents WHY their baby is so poorly and that they will receive help with conceiving a healthy child in the future. This genetic problem is apparently more common in the Faroe Islands

TE44, it is not in Charlie's interests to move him from pillar to post. He is not aware of anything around him. There is no bond. He has no cognitive understanding. Moving him to the parents house is purely for the parents benefit. There is a huge difference between a hospice and his parents home. A hospice is equiped, and has purpose built facilities and premises. Even the journey there will be very risky. Forced ventilation requires precision and constant monitoring. And the language of the parents is increasingly unfair. Today they claimed GOSH were guilty of brutality in not letting Charlie die at their home. Loz is right. The parents seem to now be dragging things out as long as possible. We would not put an animal through this. Every day that they drag this out, his organs fail a little more. The judge now needs to step in and set a date for the ventilation to be removed, and let this poor child go without any more suffering. And the parents need to accept it.
I know enough about the condition to know how impaired his cognitive function is. I have never said the child is distressed. Physical discomfort is not the same thing as cognitive function. For the child to feel a bond, he needs a certain level cognitive awareness, the ability to judge something as 'familiar'. He can not see or hear. Once the RRM2B gene began to irreversably damage his brain, his ability to recognise touch and smell also became compromised. He is also heavily sedated, necessary to have control over the forced ventilation. And that sedation will not be lifted once the ventilation is removed. It is neccessary to ease what follows. All of those things put together, hopefully help you to understand why it really doesn't matter to him where he passes. It is for the parents bereavement this request was made, understandable of course, but the responsibility of the doctors is for the child first. And that includes having control over the final environment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...