Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He's in the grip of a heinous drug addiction which will probably result in his early death. Everything he says & does is part of that addiction.

Yes he's making a c-nut of himself, but I can't condemn him, though I don't pity him either as it's his life & he can do as he chooses.

Hopefully he'll burn out & seek help sometime soon.


N:-S

That's a bit of a strange thing to say DJKQ. Having money does not make the battle with addiction any easier to beat. I would have thought the reverse would be true. Having the money to gain access to as many drugs as you could possibly ever consume would make the will-power needed to quit even more difficult to muster, regardless of the expert help available.


Addiction is a personal battle and although some treatments can be very helpful, the bottom line is that the addict must be mentally prepared to quit and live a life of abstinence. No amount of money can purchace this.

But money can buy treatment...and addicts who can't afford to buy drugs often steal to buy those drugs, or turn to dealing themselves/ prostitiution etc.


Have you seen the waiting lists for most mental health related treatments for those dependent on the NHS? And the rationing once a patient get's it? Charlie Sheen can get as much counselling and treatment as he needs at the drop of a hat. Of course the seriousness of the addition is no different for rich and poor alike and equally the person wanting to get better has to want to, but let's not pretend that money makes no difference to the level of help available and the chances for some people of getting better.

well I for one say top man!

With the airwaves clogged with the dull platitudes of even duller so-called 'personalities', I'll raise my hat to someone willing to use 'droopy-eyed armless children' as a simile in an interview.


Don't forget, he served in the Nam man, and the enemy was in him. The war is over for Charlie now, but it will always be there, the rest of his days.

Platoon and Wall Street. And bit-parts in Ferris Bueller and Being John Malkovich (Yo, Malkatraz!). That's pretty much all his output worth watching.


> So the guy likes to drink, snort and fcuk. What's wrong with that? Good luck to him.

It's more his history of beating up women which is the problem.

Platoon. Is that the one where he doesn?t surf? Or is that some other cockswinging army filim?


Anyway I followed a link from that quiz page and some of these outputs are pretty dam special. I wish I had said them. Maybe in a job interview or when I first met my in-laws:


"I'm tired of pretending like I'm not special. I'm tired of pretending like I'm not bitching, a total fricking rock star from Mars, and people can't figure me out, they can't process me. I don't expect them to. You can't process me with a normal brain,"


"I am on a drug, it's called 'Charlie Sheen'. It's not available because if you try it once, you will die. Your face will melt off and your children will weep over your exploded body."


"Sorry my life is so much more bitchin' than yours. I planned it this way."


"Practice is for amateurs,"

Apart from some of the slightly odd statements (the magic fingers et al), I actually kind of respected alot of what he had to say.

Just because he isn't doing the usual trite nods to the moralising mainstream in the US, doesn't make him bad or mad. His just somewhat drug frazzled, but in Ozzy Osborne, that's considered charming.


I loved it whe he was asked if he was using and he said 'using what? I use a blender, I use a [n. other kitchen implement], using's such a bullshit AA term'. Top stuff.


The only thing wrong with Charlie's life is that he wasn't born an englishman where overdoing booze and experimenting in drugs is the norm (ish).

MP wrote

The only thing wrong with Charlie's life is that he wasn't born an englishman where overdoing booze and experimenting in drugs is the norm (ish).


Well who to say MP, he will not end up that way and end up like a lot of Hollywood actors dead and as for Ozzy Osborne he totally fucked he find is hard to string two word together if that is not a poster advert for over excess what is;-)

I just don't have the constituion for it Ridgely, but I do find his attitude and refusal to be a role model refreshing.


Plus anyone choosing to be a little bit Sheen (or Ozzy for that matter) has a pretty good idea what lies at the of the journey. (but wadda ride!!)


Mind you, pops almost died doing Apolcalypse Now, I suspect there's a genetic aspect to the Sheen eccentricity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...