Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nearly asked this on the MMR thread but then realised it would either send it off at a tangent or be ignored!


As a paeds nurse I've seen a few cases of "when chickenpox go bad" but literally no more than the fingers of one hand over 10yrs and all of which made good recoverys and wouldn't make me leap to pay for a vaccination for the bugglet.


I find it especially surprising to see that some who worry about giving the regular immunisations are then seeming happy to consider giving/give their child this.


IIRC chickenpox immunity is something that's checked on the first set of blood tests you have when pregnant - I could imagine it being useful to check this pre-conception (fate allowing) and then having the jab, but can't understand why giving it to a baby/young child is beneficial...

We had our 2 year old daughter vaccinated against chicken pox just before christmas. It's a personal decision but these were our reasons:

a) It is routinely done in the US, Canada, Japan, South Africa etc and my husband is American so we have heard a lot about it being done over there. 41 of the 50 states require immunisation for children going to government run schools

b) with a new baby in the house I was worried that having two children with chicken pox at once would be difficult and perhaps dangerous for the baby (at that time 4 months old)

c) I had chicken pox quite badly as a child and still have some scars today

d) Lower down the list but still a consideration - taking time off work to look after her would have been difficult and might have meant I have to use up my few holiday days which we need to go and visit the inlaws abroad so they can see their grandchildren

We went to a clinic on Harley Street recommended on the forum and it was incredibly quick, easy. Daughter didn't make a peep while having it done and there were absolutely no after effects.

From NHS website:

9 out of 10 children vaccinated with a single dose will develop immunity against chickenpox

http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/varicella-vaccine/Pages/Introduction.aspx


I'm not sure what the figure is for later immunity if you catch the disease naturally.


Some arguments here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8557236.stm

I was heavily pregnant with #2 when we decided to vaccinate our then 21 month old - knowing that it's a routine vaccination in the US, Canada etc (and mostly a cost decision of the NHS not to do it here) I thought it would be nice (indeed, not essential, but I think there's nothing wrong with "nice" if the jab is just as good as catching the disease) to save my toddler the discomfort of getting chickenpox and us the worry of possibly having to deal with an unwell toddler right before or after the birth of a new baby which is an intense enough event as it is. Our eldest has been directly exposed to chicken pox at least three times since her jab and hasn't caught it.

Just to reassure, I've never seen babies in A&E with complications from chickenpox, I've heard if mums being keen fir them to have it early as they don't scratch as much = less scarring.


One of my best friends has a 2.5yr & 2 mths, the 2.5yr has it at the moment but the baby hasn't been affected - my guess is that it's due to a 2mth old not being so exciting a playmate so unlikely to be in line of fire for sneezes/being breathed on by the 2.5yr for long enough to pass the virus on.


Still unsure about the reasoning behind national immunisation campaigns in the countries mentioned... Could understand it being beneficial once teenage/adult if not had chickenpox as it does seem to affect adults more, but not seen anything to convince me yet.

http://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/1032.aspx?CategoryID=62&SubCategoryID=63


"The chickenpox vaccine is not part of the UK childhood vaccination programme, because experts think that introducing a chickenpox vaccination for children could increase the risk of shingles in older people"

I understand that there may be some link to having had the chicken pox immunisation and a greater chance of getting shingles in adulthood. I read this in an interview with the very clever chap who created the immunisation, however, my personal experience is... first two children were either born or lived in US, where it is almost impossible to avoid the immunisation, so we did what we were advised and had them immunised. No problems.

Our third child was born and has always lived here in London. He got chicken pox at around two years. I was so chilled out about it. He was pretty ill with it, although no more than I think is normal with a 'bad case', however, as a result of the fever he had a febrile convulsion, which was (although completely 'normal' I know!) completely terrifying, while it was happening we felt completely unable do anything, wonderful paramedics and a long day spent in A&E.

I don't know if I would have done it any differently, but I guess my story would be that although our little one recovered as would be expected from chicken pox/febrile convulsion, just but to watch the fever if they get it, and to use calpol etc to keep it under control! I think I was probably just too relaxed about 'it's just chicken pox!'

Australia also immunise against chicken pox as I discovered recently when my son caught it and my nephew had been vaccinated over there! My GP had advised against it here and I didn't look into it any further. Wish I had as my son had it badly!
Buggie - got to factor in that you don't get CP till 10-21 days incubation after exposure, so if 2.5 yr old was exposed e.g. at nursery, playgroup etc, baby may develop it after older sibling. My eldest had it this week - just waiting for youngest to come down with it ....almost at ten days and watching!

We are on day 19 of 'CP Watch' for my youngest, who spent two days at childminders with a little girl during the pre spots, highly contagious phase. No signs yet, but will be glad if it does come out as I would really like to get it over and done with. Will be astounded if she doesn't get it given the level of exposure.


My friends little girl got her first spot on day 20 so there is still time.


Hmmm.

I'm tempted to have my 6 year old vaccinated, he's been exposed to

chickenpox on at least three occasions but has never caught it, unless he had such a mild dose

that none of us noticed!

I managed to avoid it as a child, but finally caught it at university when I was about 23,

I was horribly ill for a week, completely flattened with flu like symptoms and almost missed my

final exams because of it.

Anecdotal evidence - interested to hear if this is borne out by research - is that the earlier you have chicken pox the easier it is to bear. So adults have a terrible time, but babies get over it fairly quickly.


My LO has had chicken pox twice (and one of the carers at her nusrery said that she'd had it three times!)

LO had bad eczema when she was little and I worried about whether she would be extra itchy when ill with the chicken pox, especially as advised not to use steroid creams while she was ill. But it turned out that her usual emollients (Diprobase and oIlatum) kept her skin comfortable enough to stop her itching very much at all

Moos - if you've had CP, and are breastfeeding then my understanding is that it is very unlikely that Twosling will get it, or if so it should be extremely mild (which can mean they catch it again at some point). I know quite a lot of instances of the toddler getting it but the newborn not in this circumstance.


BeccaL - personally I think your hubby should get vacinated, because even if your daughter doesn't catch the pox this time around she is bound to at some point so better for you as a family if your hubby isn't running this risk, based on all the evidence of it being much worse if you catch it as an adult.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Huggers, please can you share the fabulous chiropodist's details?  Huggers, I think podiatrists are the same and podiatrists, pretty much. Why aren't you sticking with the chiropractor, out of interest, if they seem to think the problem is more posture-related than solely (sorry) down to the feet? 
    • Thankyou! Originally I had a private referral ( husband had health insurance at time) and so worn insoles for years but I still wear my shoes down in one place at a ridiculous rate! A fab chiropodist agrees with posture is everything stance. Experienced cobbler says some it ain’t right and I’m over corrected. 
    • I've booked a session with Elmcourt Clinic in West Norwood, recommended by our daughter. A two-week wait for the slot, though.  https://www.elmcourtclinic.co.uk/
    • I don't know everyone else's foot problems are, but I have classic and apparently quite bad deformity - bunions, pain etc. I went to the Woodware Rd practice a few years ago and got orthotics for the not inconsiderable price of £600.  The team there seems very nice but, now that I am experiencing a new type of foot pain, I'm wondering if I've been doing it all wrong these years with supportive trainers and insoles. I'm beginning to realise (seems obvious now) that, if I want to cure my foot pain, maybe I need to change the way I walk, and my posture etc. And also, maybe I need to try barefoot shoes, to build muscle where there's been no need prior, because shoes have been doing all the supporting.  I've been educating myself with Helen Hall and Lawrence van Lingen and addressing my gait seems like a more organic way to solve the problem. Podiatrists will convince you that orthotics and / or surgery are the only way to go, but look up reddit forums and you'll find countless people saying they 'cured' their bunions with barefoot walking / shoes / and exercises.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...