Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On the corner of Crawthrew Grove and Spurling road there are two empty shops. The one has a to-let sign outside and the other, the one closest to Lordship Lane, is closed up but on Saturday night I?m sure I saw a red neon sign through the window that said ?sex?. The sign was facing towards the inside of the shop.


Anyone have any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1600-sex-sign-in-empty-corner-shop/
Share on other sites

Domitianus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well all the yummy-mummies have to earn their

> pin-money somehow now that their hubbies are

> losing their City jobs! Problem is, I hear they

> are all lousy lays.



Who, obviously, don't use 'protection', either.

This and the Porche posts have had me laughing so loud I'm scaring my neighbours!


I was gonna say you can get it for ?10-20 in Soho if you fancy something more sleazy, but then it got me thinking.


Why isn't there a Soho for women?


Why don't women have places they can visit with a gang of their mates, all tanked up and buy a bloke for a tenner each?


Do you think I'd be able to turn Underhill Road into a ladies Soho? Anyone want to be my biatch?


Ladies, do you fancy a bit of the other when the old man's busting a gut in Canary Wharf?


I'd test drive all the talent first to make sure they are up to the job.


It might just work, what do you reckon?

You mean NOT using that type of protection - as you suggested in an earlier posting? I agree. Imagine the poor punters having to try to get turned-on whilst gazing into those empty and vacuous phizzogs! Hey, how long do you think we can get away with this heretical practice of diss'ing the sacred cows that are the ED yummy-mummies before we are either lounged or censored?

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This and the Porche posts have had me laughing so

> loud I'm scaring my neighbours!

>

> I was gonna say you can get it for ?10-20 in Soho

> if you fancy something more sleazy, but then it

> got me thinking.

>

> Why isn't there a Soho for women?

>

> Why don't women have places they can visit with a

> gang of their mates, all tanked up and buy a bloke

> for a tenner each?

>

> Do you think I'd be able to turn Underhill Road

> into a ladies Soho? Anyone want to be my biatch?

>

> Ladies, do you fancy a bit of the other when the

> old man's busting a gut in Canary Wharf?

>

> I'd test drive all the talent first to make sure

> they are up to the job.

>

> It might just work, what do you reckon?



I will be your biatch! I mean, why should the girls get all the fun? Being paid to shag all day? As long as I don't have to develop a drug habit to justify my choice of lifestyle!

Some ladies pop over to Turkey where there are thousands of tall, dark and handsome Turks who migrate from the centre of the country to the Tourist resorts. Given that they have grown up in very traditional environments and have no experience of certain aspects of life, the allure of our ladies is great.


There are of course at least 2 Turkish kebab shops within meters of said corner shop. Staying on topic.

I must say I agree with you entirely Rose. Perhaps we can raise this possibility the next time a local retail outlet goes up for sale and we start speculating about who will move in. Why should we limit ourselves to estate agents, kitchenware shops, clothes shops, M&S etc etc when we can have a good old-fashioned, local neighbourhood sex-shop selling s**tloads of porn, vibrators that dwarf the City of London gherkin and garish crotchless knickers? About time ED had its own sex shop but I guess DM and the like will bleat on about how sex is demeaning to women or the like (since we all know she had her kids by immaculate conception - snigger!!!)

Yes but my point is, why should us women have to go all the way to Turkey. You guys can spend the price of a good lunch and get ur needs catered to in your fag break, but we would have to fork out for air fare, hotels etc and take time off from our busy schedules to do it!



I want to start a petition:


"We the undersigned believe in equality of the sexes and want a cheap man-brothel to cater for our womenly lusts that is open from 11am till midnight, doesn't cost more than a couple of lattes and a sandwich in Cafe Nero, and doesn't involve us having to cook, clean or reciprocate in any way other than fiscally"

I'd just be happy with a woman friendly "adult" shop like what Sh! is (exclamation point part of the title as previously mentioned). Sh! was Europe's first woman owned woman run and women friendly sex shop when it opened about 16 years ago. Men only allowed in if accompanied by a woman (and a long line of credit!) They have a concession in Selfridges and I reckon a branch in East Dulwich would be just right. I promise I am not employed to advertise them! Anyway, yes, a simple woman friendly sex shop would be fine - I'm not embarrassed to be seen walking to any of them except the ones in Soho and to be fair even the bigger chains (hohoho) are more woman friendly than they used to be. They know we have money, too. We're adults too, remember? Ok - on with yer smut.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The voters in these redwall seats all complain of a broken Britain etc etc - yet see no connection between the  country voting tory for 14 years and those towns voting for Brexit despite being warned it would lead to problems - they just moan about everything - often quite correctly (services are expensive or being cut, roads are a state, housing is expensive etc etc) but when you ask them when things were better.. well the answer is either    a) under a labour government when we part of the EU or b) some fictional Facebook sepia tinted picture of Britain "when you could leave your front door open, we didn't know how lucky we were" Voters say they want the truth but when someone sane (if dull and sometimes wrong) gets into power and says "lads, things are worse than we realised" they bleat about a lack of instant fixes and say it's wrong to keep blaming the last government (despite the lie about Labour crashing the economy in 2008 STILL being a stick labour get beaten with in 2025) as for rejoining the EU - the barriers are immense - you have a press and a large portion of teh population that will behave just abysmally. You have an electorate that recognises the mistake but is all very English and "made out beds, mustn't grumble" etc etc - no backbone. And you have an opposition party (or two) that is plain bonkers and when labour do lose power they would renege/reverse any progress made in matters EU in seconds Meanwhile EU countries can see all this clearly and have no incentive to engage until this country grows up and is able to demonstrate they won't act hysterically when reintegration starts
    • This is an extract from an edition with Dave Walker, mediator extraordinaire, born at the Elephant & Castle and still living in Southwark. One of his great achievements is training young people to be peer mediators ... who even step in to work with disputing adults! Just shows what can be achieved and who can achieve it. Pretty much anyone and everyone.  Next week we publish a special edition with Jo Berry who has very powerful story to tell. Further more, there was an invited audience of local people young and old, with whom she engaged in open discussion for an hour. Insights galore!
    • Yes, given the clear (and predictable) failure of Brexit, all the negative effects, and the overwhelming proportion of people agreeing that it has failed, I really can't understand why Labour have gone down the "making it work" road. But then I have no idea of what reversing some or all of it might involve. Also, Reform don't mention Brexit much, do they? If at all.  They push other aspects of what they say they stand for. So the people inclined to vote for them have probably completely forgotten they were ever associated with Brexit.
    • Latest news from the sunlit uplands, on the same day the UK economy 'unexpectedly' shrank 0.1%... As an aside, the cognitive dissonance shown by large parts of the UK electorate over Brexit is quite a thing to behold. I don't think it's controversial to say that Brexit is now considered by a large % of the population to have failed, with the % who see it as a success in single figures. Yet, initial polling for the upcoming Runcorn by-election shows Reform winning what is a relatively safe Labour seat. Now I get protest votes and all that, but Reform were literally the Brexit Party before the rebrand. If there's such a large consensus that Brexit failed, why would so many even consider voting for a party that actively helped deliver Brexit and all the known economic damage it would cause? And that's before you even get to the fantasy economics it presented at the last General Election. Labour haven't helped themselves either, by pursuing a nonsensical 'We can make Brexit work' approach, they have in effect made themselves impotent when it comes to attacking Reform and what they stand for...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...