Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That old chestnut.


The fact ?I say? there isn?t one good restaurant in the village obviously points me being a duck? That V Funny!


Rather than a very disappointed consumer who?s had to suffer dreadful food at every turn in the Village.


Now I?m expecting another bunch of imbeciles who haven?t been to CRocca ?S4!T? to start going on about how bad I am. When it?s CRocca Poo that?s bad.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------

> It's also worth pointing out that protesting your

> innocence doesn't make any difference - that's

> what serial killers and their mums do. If you want

> people to perceive you as a generally honest and

> positive contributor, then start being positive

> and start contributing somethin of value instead

> of smearing restaurants.


As close to a Godwin as you can get without getting your credibility burnt

Witch hunt?. ?


Back on subject?.


Anyone got a good restaurant they can recommend for Lunch in and around East Dulwich or the Village maybe one I havn?t noticed?


I quite like the palmerston ?expensive? and thai corner caf? ?when open? and ganapati ?quality?.


Or if I?m on for a Caf? I quite like the one next to property inn and the shoe shop on L Lane.


Anyone ?

Poor Fazer, in amongst the shower of bullets there are some nuggets of good advice there, the main one being you have made and defended your point repeatedly, time to move on. Pkease feel free to comment on any of my million threads,I welcome a fiery spirit.


It's all a learning curve, those long-timers tend to be harsh on us newbies, it's all part of the etiquette training..

But a good start at recovery.


I doubt there's much around here that's not known about, though Le Moulin seems to have an SEP field around it.

It has its yeasayers around here (most notably the legendary Louisa) but I haven't been. If I get an urge for angel delight and prawn cocktail* I'll be willing to give it a go.


I second Ganapati, the closest thing we have to a hidden gem in the area.


* in all fairness I may be doing the place a disservice, especially never having been.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So I saw. If we all liked the same things it'd be

> a dull world.



true, true... you hated ganapati Frank but loved two sisters tandoori which i found very disappointing - takes all sorts.

Maxxi, I think that's a misreading of Godwins Law, which involves the concept of Reductio Ad Absurdum


I wasn't trying to compare fazer71 to a serial killer, nor trying to use hyperbole to win a specious argument - I was merely trying to point out that protesting one's innocence was a waste of breath: it's the evidence that counts.


I was also joking, which is notoriously absent from Godwin's interpretation.

Snorky's law

From Edipedia, the free and nonsense local encyclopaedia


:X - Mr Snorky, formulator of the "law"


Snorky's law (also known as The Recursive Godwin Rule, The Rule of Nazi Analogy Analogies or Snorky's Law of Tiresome Bollox)[1][2] is a humorous observation made by Mr Snorky in 2011[2] which has become an Internet adage. It states: "anyone who uses/ quotes or references Godwins[sic] law at any point, even if it is tongue in cheek and Ironic.[sic] is quite frankly,[sic] a tiresome and unoriginal drone"

One of the other less well known laws of Huncamunca regards the tiresome use of Grammatical and punctuatation pendantry that serves as a response or counterpoint to a preceding post , usually as a means to humilate or show a lack of intelligence in the OP and/or a demonstation of educational achievement,invariably places responder further into tiresome drone category.

I would never dream of suggesting a lack of intelligence as you clearly are as sharp as they come. A little misguided maybe, but that's another story ;-P

So safe to assume I was going for some common or garden humiliation, whilst simultaneously showing my appreciation for your caustic wit in a demonstration of my ambivalence; my post was after all an homage, not an attack.

Very interesting...


But fazer71 has got a point I thought rocca was really awful.


So still not suggestions of anywhere to get a decent lunch around dulwich "east and village or near?"


Maybe it's a hopeless request or maybe average to poor quality is what is accepted by locals?

I notice that you edited your post to include your blight against Rocca, are you in cahoots with Fazer71? Hehe


Why don't you try the Rye pub on Peckham Rye - they are having a food festival this weekend. I've tried the vietnamese offering at Broadway Market - that was 'yummy'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was in Forest Hill Road today, just past the Rye, and noticed there is a dentist next to the Herne (pub) that has NHS signs outside. I've never had any problems getting NHS dental treatment in East Dulwich, and I get regular check ups. I've been to three  different dental practices here over the years, all with NHS treatment. I think the difficulties are in other parts of the country. Malumbu has a good explanation above. I didn't hear the Radio 4 programme, but I'm guessing that a  radio programme is not going to have time to say where you CAN easily get NHS treatment, and is bound to focus on the negatives and the horror stories, otherwise it would be very boring! ETA: Re children's teeth, I think the major issue is not lack of dentists, it is children being given sugary food, drinks and confectionery which rots their teeth. The education of parents needs to be about this, not just about tooth brushing. And in some cases the poor diet may also be due to lack of money for healthy food. Though of course the lack of dentists doesn't help, if  the tooth rotting can't be rectified by fillings or extraction.
    • Well, I hope you like what you see, the hot air, lack of answers and continual blaming things on the last Government and the made up blackhole, I find are nauseating. The man needs to see reality, because I'd guess that if we had a snap election tomorrow and based on the first six months of this parliament, Labour would get trounced. When the election does finally happen and if that isn't before the people rise up and throw this lot out, Labour will not be voted back in for a millennium.  
    • Yes thanks that's exactly the choices I get.  I will block and if somehow they find a way back I'll report.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...