Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This was just published in the TES. Some families might find this useful in considering how much 1:1 support w/ teaching assistants (TA/LSA) children recieve in the classroom, in ability groups, and/ or specific interventions. Sadly, even when inclusion is funded, it is very difficult to change a school culture which still segregates learners based on labels.


https://www.tes.com/news/tes-magazine/tes-magazine/myth-inclusion

Apologies, the link initially worked for me. Please try this to read the full article.


https://england.magazine.tes.com/editions/edition_edition_edition_5255.england/data/352027/index.html


The research team is keen to hear from parents on the findings and help with advocating for more training for TAs. If you are interested or you think your school might benefit from this please get in touch.

This is interesting but there is a lot to unpick, particularly because it bundles together 'SEN' as though it were a discrete category and implicitly, it seems to refer to children who are able, with support, mostly to access a mainstream curriculum. My experience is of primary so I can't speak for secondary. Primary schools now are working with an incredibly diverse population, some of whom will go on to Special Education at secondary. I think there is a real issue with who is responsible for the curriculum and teaching of (for example) a child or children working in Year 5/6 whose skills are at Reception/KS1 level or below. In some cases the situation is worse than described because they may be taken out of class for much of the day by a TA who themselves makes up what they do, on the strength of little training or experience. But the pressures on teachers, especially at Years 2 and 6, are enormous and they are already planning for at least 3 ability levels within the class. The curriculum becomes ever more formal and so focused on maths and literacy and if the topic is fronted adverbials or using advanced conjunctions, and the child's spoken language skills are at a 4 yr old level then they will completely zone out of the exposition and examples. Yes, there are ways of, for example, acting out 'Suddenly' or 'With a sigh ..' to bring it to life but when it comes to all the written examples and you have children who are at the stage of matching sounds to letters and reading the simplest 3 letter words, then inevitably there is much of the curriculum where their needs diverge massively. In my view, there can be real benefits to children of a similar developmental level sometimes working together when their needs are very different to the rest of the class because it can give them the experience of working in a group with others doing similar work at a similar level, which otherwise they would miss out on. The worst of all is that they sit through something they can't possibly understand and learn the lesson that there is no point even in listening, they don't develop a sense of themselves as learners and then the only learning is how to manage boredom. They also benefit from time spent with their age-matched peers in class and yes, they need qualified teacher input. The best teacher/TA teams each work with all the abilities within the class.

I hope this doesn't sound defeatist - I am a passionate advocate for children with complex needs but I also have a lot of time for teachers and see the pressure they are under and the hours they work, and how much work can be involved in including a child whose learning needs and abilities are very different from most of the children in the class. I think we may have invested too much in the TA model when it might be better to have fewer, but better qualified staff who specialise in SEN who can help with devising a balanced curriculum for these children within a mainstream setting, one which brings together teaching at the right developmental level - ideally in a group with developmentally matched peers at times - with multiple opportunities to work within the class. This last will often involve working with classmates to create the right support and environment.

Hi there - our council (Bromley) offered to train up our son's class teaching assistant on visual impaired issues. It was only a week long course but great opportunity. Maybe that could be a possibility? The TA was delighted to do it (skills development for her) and is now following the class to Year 1.
Guardians have a tendency to enter the statementing procedure planning to secure to balanced help from a showing aide (TA), especially when their tyke's needs can be met in a standard school. Many concur TA hours are the acknowledged cash of help and arrangement is regularly evaluated regarding TA hours.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...