Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think calling a Porsche owner a "flash git" is fair enough, to be honest... after all, you don't buy cars like that unless you want to be noticed (especially in London). Sure, it's not exactly a compliment, but it's the kind of comment that can be taken as a light-hearted jibe, perhaps even peppered with a hint of envy.

Both Brendan and Jeremy make fair points.


Nice tasteful old 60's Porsche = car enthusiast with an eye for style, probably prepared to get his hands dirty.

Two year-old cheesey Carrera = flash git with zero taste and no imagination.


I would never be such an idiot as to drag a key down the side of the latter: I'm already satisfied with the knowledge that the owner is most likely a bit of a cock.

I know people are entitled to make their point, but...

Is it the considered view of the majority on the forum that owners of, say, a 2 year old Porsche are "flash gits" and "cocks"?

If so I am embarassed to have spent much of the last year here.

Let's just assume for a moment that its my Porsche that got vandalised, would *Bob*, Keef and Maurice like to make themselves known and we can talk about it?

I'm gonna have to point out that a couple of people's opinion isn't the majority of the forum (I make it 0.18%).


Anyway, I don't think that owners of a 2 year old Porsche are "flash gits" and "cocks", I'll admit I'm slightly envious of them but I'd rather my scooter round town anyday.

Well then Jon you get a big sympathetic hand on the shoulder from me.

If one's suffered a crime it really shouldn't matter whether that crime was the loss of a funky friendly VW camper van, or a porsche.


I'm guessing we're seeing some schandenfreude manifesting here, so come on forumites, a little empathy here please.


"I'll admin I'm slightly envious of them" schadenfreude and freudian slips!!

Jonsuissy, as a previous owner of a 2 year old Porsche I can confirm that I was indeed a flash git and a bit of a cock. But times change and so does taste and now I'm just a git (without a Porsche).


I once lived on Underhill and regularly had cars broken into or keyed. On one night both cars were broken into. My neighbour regularly had the whole front bumper section of her 4x4 stolen, obviously to order.

I wouldn't confuse OWNING a 2 year old Porsche, and having it vandalised


I would be against any kind of vandalism, even if provoked mightily (eg someone doing same to my car)


But if you are asking the question what do people on here think of owners of 2 year old Porsches - and you seem to be... that will invite a response


I can only speak for myself but I wouldn't go as far as some of the comments but I would think "hmmmmm, it's not exactly classy". But then people make snap judgments on appearances all the time (it's surely one of the reasons someone would buy such a car, no?)


I definitely don't think it's as bad as personalised number plates mind you

*Bob* - no as it happens I don't.

I'm off though, this is not a nice place.

I think this could be a fantastic forum, its just that people can hide behind their keyboards and say these truly awful things without thinking.

That poor guy has had his car damaged quite badly.

How he spends his money is up to him.

I myself have "wasted" an awful lot of money on a quite nice Home Entertainment system, if the likes of *Bob* & co were to come round for a beer and see it, would they say, "cock", "flash git" or whatever. A much nicer and more enlightened reaction would be, hey that's nice, I might try and save up for that.

Perhaps that's just me.

Indeed.. I only speak for myself. Just one in a thousand on this day alone (handshakes all round etc)


I've already made it clear, crystal clear, in black and white, that it is only idiots who cause criminal damage to other people's property, for whatever reason.

All that is left is the flash git / cock thing. If jonsuissy is indeed the owner of a two year-old Carrera, then he might assume I'm calling him a flash git and a cock, in which cash he might be upset. So I thought I ought to ask, just to be clear.. you know.

Jon,

An internet forum is about writing.. and reading. If you are (as it seems) lacking in the skills to read posts properly, then you're probably right - it isn't the place for you.


Incidentally, there is no connection between an expensive home entertainment system inside your home for you to enjoy, and a cheesey ?50k style-free car, placed outside your home as a status-symbol for other people to admire/laugh at.

"A much nicer and more enlightened reaction would be, hey that's nice, I might try and save up for that."


Nicer maybe but I'm not sure why enlightened. Would you think that of one of those big yellow humvee things?

No, I didn't think so.


I have no intention of owning a car while I live in london, but I've fancied on of these for a bit


and would fully acknowledge people saying I'm a bit of an idiot ;-)

That looks like a perfectly sensible mode of transport Mockney. I think you should get one. I have been looking at big chrome covered motorbikes recently. I?m also growing my hair. Is 30 too young for a midlife crisis?


Anyway I have a theory that cars have to prove themselves. If after 20 years they are still attractive and functional then they are great and worthy of praise. You can generally see when a new car is released whether it will have these qualities but some surprise you. BMW E30s are starting to look really good.


But then I?m an opinionated so and so. And at the moment I drive a newish vauxhaul asbo as Mrs B needs a ?practical? car for work and we can?t justify having 2 cars in London so I?m also a hypocrite.


Sorry you have been offended jonsuissy sometimes a little more than a pinch of salt is required on this forum.

Mockney

I was about to say I've always fancied a Reliant Robin like our near neighbour Del Boy - until I saw that it was sold for ?44,000 recently.

That would open such a can of worms wouldn't it, don't think I'll bother :)

Have to park it in my living room I suppose.

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bob, least you can do is wash jonsuissy's car as

> penance. Sponge, Bob?


As penance for what?

For jonsuissy misreading my post - and jumping to the bizarre conclusion that somehow it is my heartfelt belief that Porsche Carrera owners deserve to have their cars vandalised.. and then going off in a huff?

Funny you should say that Brendan. It's a motorbike substitute as GF and family threatened to kidnap me and lock me in a shed forever if I went through with buying a bike. This looked like a second best.

It does 90mph apparently ... round corners.


Jonsuissy, 44 grand for a robin?!! A can of worms indeed, and I have a feeling you'd probably find one of those on the back too!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...