Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's a cost/benefit issue - not a fixed argument.


For some people cost may be defined merely in financial terms, or in convenience terms; for others it may be defined in social terms or environmental terms.


Likewise benefits may be classed in emotional, financial, temporal or other terms.


I disagree with DJKQ that someone may have 'no other option but to own a car', but I agree that there are situations where the benefits of owning a car would likely enormously outwiegh the perceived cost - especially for those who are physically disabled by age or infirmity, for those with extended family responsibilities and so on.


Even in those situations there are alternatives - and they will find themselves in the spotlight when the cost of the resources to run a car starts to escalate (for example the price of oil), or the efficiency of car ownership decreases (for example through gridlock).


Likewise having points on your license doesn't mean you MUST buy a car, it just means that if you want a car, you can't use a carclub.

Talking of costs and benefits - in my last bit of research I found lots of evidence linking car use negatively with physical activity. Those who used cars less had higher levels of active travel/ physical activity, lower BMIs (body mass index), rates of obesity etc. And all these bits of physical activity have strong health implications. Do you think that if people were aware of the health costs of car use and benefits of short walks e.g to bus stops etc - this would change their attitude towards car use? i.e, increase awareness of costs of car use relative to benefits?

It would probably be preaching to the converted.


It's another example of carclubs failing to hit the mark in identifying the motives of those who could use carclubs but don't.


Exchanging a privately owned personal transport for a shared-ownership one can't possibly campaign on the basis that the 3 min walk to the car is going to increase their health.

Tbh right now I'd find use of a car club cheaper than keeping my own car but I have 6 points on my licence (due to expire August) and no car club will let me join because of that. I do wherever cheaper/ easier use bicycle/ bus etc but there are times where only a car will suffice.
I wasn't thinking about it in relation to car club at all - I was just wondering whether thinking about benefits to ones own health etc would be a better motivational factor in reducing car use than the environment has been...I certainly wasn't imagining car club promoters pushing that one...

I don't think so, because it's too rational. Car ownership is predicated upon irrational convictions.


You could achieve it by running campaigns with fat losers behind the wheel of a car, doing fat loser things and dying young.


You'd get hauled over the coals for it, but at the moment car ads are full of young pretty people doing successful things with a promise about sex at the end. It's just as distorting.

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Following on from this I have been running a survey in the lounge. Just in case anyone who participated in the discussion hasn't filled in the survey - here it is.

Click here to take survey


For each completed survey money will be donated to something worthwhile (ALD Life, St Christopher's Hospice or one of the local schools listed - you choose which).


Thanks

Belinda

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...