Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Received such bad service at this interior deco shop, felt compelled to make my first post on EDL!


Few weeks ago me and hubby went into Old Villa on a Sunday (for the first time) where there was a 20% sale on, and spotted a beautiful giant footstool that?s perfect for our lounge. It had lots of other stock on top of it, but measured it and told the shop Assistant to put it on hold for us while we went home to measure up.


Few hours later we returned to buy it (very excited), but when the Assistant removed the stock, we found a few noticeable liquid stains on the velvet upholstery. The Assistant agreed that it warranted an additional discount, and offered a further 10% off. We countered that if she gave us 15% we?d be happy to take it (and strategically scatter some cushions!). The shop would still be making ?416 from us so we figured it was fair! She said she had to phone the store owner/ manager who was at home on her day off to okay this.


5 minutes later she came back to say that there was no answer on the Manager?s phone, so she could only give us the 10% off as originally offered. We agreed to buy it and paid for the item on our credit card, and started covering the footstool with bubble wrap to take it home.


We had just picked up the item to carry it to the van we?d hired to take the footstool home, when the phone rang. The Assistant was gone for 3-4 minutes and came back out ashen faced. The Manager had called to see what was up, and told the Assistant that she had no right to negotiate a further 10% discount, and that we had to pay the additional 10% or leave the item.


Awkward moment! I told the Assistant that while we appreciated a mistake had been made, this was an internal issue between her and her Mnager and not our fault. We asked if I could speak to the Manager on the phone to discuss the matter/look at alternatives/etc. but the Manager was unwilling to talk to us because it was her ?day off?. When we pointed out that technically the item already belonged to us since we had ALREADY PAID FOR IT, she said her Manager said she couldn?t let us leave the store with the item!!!


My kind hearted Husband decided we should let it go, since the Assistant would probably lose her job if we did take the item, even though we?d ALREADY BOUGHT IT. So we were forced to take a refund of the money, and left with our tails between our legs.


The shop had our contact details and we expected the Manager to call us on the Monday to apologise or offer us an alternative or explain the situation?.but she never got in touch. This is singularly the most appalling customer service experience we have ever had, and we are still smarting from it! We expected at the very least an apology, since the mistake was on their part, and we had beenso inconvenienced by the whole thing.


I just don?t know how this 'Manager' person manages to run a business when she knows nothing about dealing with customers. In a location like this, you would expect that customer loyalty and word of mouth would play a big role in building a loyal customer base, so I don't know how she thinks she can treat people this way. But needless to say, after the shabby way we were treated, we will never spend our money in this shop, and would advise others against it unless they would like a dose of horrendous treatment from the proprietors!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...