Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Even the Fishermen don't want Jacob Rees-Mogg on their boat.


Edit: No it was TFL who blocked him. "Mr Rees-Mogg then fled the protest"


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/jacob-reesmogg-thames-fishing-protest-descends-into-farce-as-tfl-blocks-trawler-from-docking-a3795181.html

The fishermen really ought to zip it- they singlehandedly decimated the stocks during the 60's and early 70s and appear to be intent on destroying whatever is left. They have resisted all attempts at taking on consensual limits in order to preserve what stocks are left and seem intent on going for a last big send off before we can officially declare the water around the UK biologically dead.

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The fishermen really ought to zip it- they

> singlehandedly decimated the stocks during the

> 60's and early 70s and appear to be intent on

> destroying whatever is left. They have resisted

> all attempts at taking on consensual limits in

> order to preserve what stocks are left and seem

> intent on going for a last big send off before we

> can officially declare the water around the UK

> biologically dead.



All of this is very true, but UK fishing vessels are hardly unique. It?s the same the world over, particularly Japan. Although it looks as if local cod stocks are recovering slowly, so that?s something, it it?s taken a lot of effort.


Actually that?s not entirely true - Iceland and Norway are good at stock management.

Its the elephant in the room WRT the fishing industry but they were still scrapping with the icelanders over white fish during the early years of our EEC membership as out waters were finished. It was only with the unwelcome imposition of Euro fishing Diktat and management do we have anything left at all. Grimsby and the other white fish ports were moribund & in a terminal death spiral by that time and there was no going back after the EEC wide fisheries policy was introduced - indeed, we only have herring on the menu because of a draconian approach that lasted many years.The non stop tropes about Spanish boats taking our red white ad blue fish are irrational bollocks. Brexit will finish off the UK fishing industry if we are left to manage it ourselves


And yes Iceland and Norway manage their stocks carefully and the fishermen understand why this needs to happen.


ETA because they have not been pandered to by successive governments & have not developed into foot stampy petulant spoilt children

It is not just fishing that could hit the bottom, it's agriculture too. Farming has the benefit of huge EU subsidies and protections from foreign competition. Half our food exports are to the EU. The subsidies alone amount to ?3bn. Are the government going to replace that? There is a growing queue of beneficiaries of current EU funding making a play for that ?11bn in membership fee we are going to save.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43484031


The comments - from both sides after this flabby article - literally suspend belief(hyperbole is the new black on here it seems)- have we really have turned into such a wretched country?


ETA, interestingly there are more fish in the Thames than any point during in the past couple of hundred years. It has been a long process but without EEC/EC/EU water directives forcing our craven hand, it would have take a lot longer and we would far less to show

Cambridge Analytica have emptied their offices before the information commissioner can get in - that raid was delayed and publicised - so there won't be any smoking guns there.


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/22/cambridge-analytica-warrant-high-court-adjourns-hearing-information-commissioner

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its the elephant in the room WRT the fishing

> industry but they were still scrapping with the

> icelanders over white fish during the early years

> of our EEC membership as out waters were finished.

> It was only with the unwelcome imposition of Euro

> fishing Diktat and management do we have anything

> left at all. Grimsby and the other white fish

> ports were moribund & in a terminal death spiral

> by that time and there was no going back after the

> EEC wide fisheries policy was introduced -

> indeed, we only have herring on the menu because

> of a draconian approach that lasted many years.The

> non stop tropes about Spanish boats taking our red

> white ad blue fish are irrational bollocks. Brexit

> will finish off the UK fishing industry if we are

> left to manage it ourselves

>

> And yes Iceland and Norway manage their stocks

> carefully and the fishermen understand why this

> needs to happen.

>

> ETA because they have not been pandered to by

> successive governments & have not developed into

> foot stampy petulant spoilt children


This is quite an interesting blog post on the topic: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/06/10/dont-blame-the-eu-for-the-decline-in-some-british-fishing-ports/

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cambridge Analytica have emptied their offices before the information commissioner can get in -

> that raid was delayed and publicised - so there won't be any smoking guns there.

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/22/cambridge-analytica-warrant-high-court-adjourns-hearing-information-commissioner



Trump bad, Obama good??


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election


"Consciously or otherwise, the individual volunteer will be injecting all the information they store publicly on their Facebook page ? home location, date of birth, interests and, crucially, network of friends ? directly into the central Obama database."

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cambridge Analytica have emptied their offices

> before the information commissioner can get in -

> > that raid was delayed and publicised - so there

> won't be any smoking guns there.

> >

> >

> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/22/ca

> mbridge-analytica-warrant-high-court-adjourns-hear

> ing-information-commissioner

>

>

> Trump bad, Obama good??

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obam

> a-digital-data-machine-facebook-election

>

> "Consciously or otherwise, the individual

> volunteer will be injecting all the information

> they store publicly on their Facebook page ? home

> location, date of birth, interests and, crucially,

> network of friends ? directly into the central

> Obama database."



LOL, but Obama's nice he can come on my Facebook page anytime. If I see Trump there I'll kick him :)

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> flocker spotter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Its the elephant in the room WRT the fishing

> > industry but they were still scrapping with the

> > icelanders over white fish during the early

> years

> > of our EEC membership as out waters were

> finished.

> > It was only with the unwelcome imposition of

> Euro

> > fishing Diktat and management do we have

> anything

> > left at all. Grimsby and the other white fish

> > ports were moribund & in a terminal death

> spiral

> > by that time and there was no going back after

> the

> > EEC wide fisheries policy was introduced -

> > indeed, we only have herring on the menu

> because

> > of a draconian approach that lasted many

> years.The

> > non stop tropes about Spanish boats taking our

> red

> > white ad blue fish are irrational bollocks.

> Brexit

> > will finish off the UK fishing industry if we

> are

> > left to manage it ourselves

> >

> > And yes Iceland and Norway manage their stocks

> > carefully and the fishermen understand why this

> > needs to happen.

> >

> > ETA because they have not been pandered to by

> > successive governments & have not developed

> into

> > foot stampy petulant spoilt children

>

> This is quite an interesting blog post on the

> topic:

> http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/06/10/dont-blam

> e-the-eu-for-the-decline-in-some-british-fishing-p

> orts/


that's a pretty fair summation of the issues. thanks

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cambridge Analytica have emptied their offices

> before the information commissioner can get in -

> > that raid was delayed and publicised - so there

> won't be any smoking guns there.

> >

> >

> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/22/ca

> mbridge-analytica-warrant-high-court-adjourns-hear

> ing-information-commissioner

>

>

> Trump bad, Obama good??

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obam

> a-digital-data-machine-facebook-election

>

> "Consciously or otherwise, the individual

> volunteer will be injecting all the information

> they store publicly on their Facebook page ? home

> location, date of birth, interests and, crucially,

> network of friends ? directly into the central

> Obama database."


There are some differences: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/mar/22/meghan-mccain/comparing-facebook-data-use-obama-cambridge-analyt/

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are some differences:

> http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/mar/22/meghan-mccain/comparing-facebook-data-use-obama-cambridge-analyt/


Indeed there are. As the article points out, The Obama campaign was upfront with the Facebook users who submitted their data, where CA were not, so the Obama campaign is very much in the clear there.


But, both campaigns were equally guilty of accessing the friends information without their permission, adding them to a database and contacting them. That is a pretty crucial parallel.

This still rolls on and on (it's like background noise now) - I don't know if it's real or dirty tricks anymore. I guess the probability is both sides cheated.


Vote Leave had some money but had spent their entire allowance so they gave it to Be Leave (the youth group), But the money was given straight to AIQ in Canada. Vote Leave supposedly controlled how the money was spent.


An activist has whistle blown to the Guardian (although he still believes in Leave) about the figures and a prominent member of Vote Leave hints it's because a relationship between them ended so outing him (the guy is now the PMs political secretary). The outed guy has relations in Pakistan who are now at risk it is claimed.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43527924

Its kinda irrelvant now, as much as it may irk some - we do seem to have a politcal class who are obstinate in their need to hold onto power. Its not just the present government either, it is acrosss the board -they are all thick skinned enough to refuse to *do the right thing* when their actions are highlighted. What would have got you the boot a decade ot two ago is now just a minor irritation that should not be publicly countered and will be invariably be forgotten about by next week.


And we wonder so many of the UK population voted for brexit, when it is plain to see that for many it was their one chance, their once in an lifetime opportunity to vent their utter frustration at a class,that do not seem to care about the electorate.I am still of the opinion that the the EU was a convenient fall guy ( rightly or wrongly ) for a disposessed population. Brexit isnt the end of this, its just the beginning

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure an article by hardcore brexiteer Fraser

> Nelson (Telegraph/Spectator), in a Murdoch paper

> constitutes "a view from across the pond"


Sorry, should have added ?across the pond? tongue in cheek quotation marks here

Wow - When Grant Shapps thinks you're arrogant :)


"Last year, Shapps gave his recollection of that encounter, writing in the Sun that he was ?shocked by their sheer arrogance?. He wrote: ?At the end of the stormiest meeting I held, they informed me: ?You will live to regret your decision, chairman?.?"



https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/26/fiery-self-important-the-no-10-adviser-at-centre-of-outing-claim

Chris Wylie (the pink haired guy) in front of the House of Commons select committee


Obviously knows a bit about Cambridge Analytica but comes across as a bit of a conspiracy nut mentioning how his predescessor died in mysterious circumstances. Links AIQ and Cambridge Analytica and adds in some other "shady" companies "Black Cube" and " ASI Data Science" Mentions a total disregard for the law. Wylie says the DUP, Vote Leave, BeLeave and Veterans for Britain all used AIQ.


Wow - think the committee will probably dismiss him as a nutcase to be honest due to the way he presents himself. If I met him in the pub I would too I'm afraid :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...