Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We've probably run out of things to say.


May's attempt to satisfy both camps, with a mixed cabinet and some alignment, to be stabbed in the back by ERG and BoJo.


BoJo dropping DUP without a second thought


Tories move to the right and exodus of the moderates


BoJo managing to make the country even more divided


A worse deal and a worse PM than under May yet much of the country swallows it


On the good side it's focused my view on what't to blame - an internecine conflict on the fields of Eton


Nothing new there but thanks for letting me get this off my chest Cat

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We've probably run out of things to say.

>

> May's attempt to satisfy both camps, with a mixed

> cabinet and some alignment, to be stabbed in the

> back by ERG and BoJo.

>

> BoJo dropping DUP without a second thought

>

> Tories move to the right and exodus of the

> moderates

>

> BoJo managing to make the country even more

> divided

>

> A worse deal and a worse PM than under May yet

> much of the country swallows it

>

> On the good side it's focused my view on what't to

> blame - an internecine conflict on the fields of

> Eton

>

> Nothing new there but thanks for letting me get

> this off my chest Cat


agreed.....there's nothing to say......

I?m mostly glad we didn?t actually win the Rugby World Cup


Not for the sporting prowess, it?s been a brilliant tournament. But only for the fact that Bojo and Farage might have taken it and denigrated it as some kind of ?Engeeeerland? look how mighty we can be guff.


But of course it was Corbyn?s fault too, why not.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dulwichbloke Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lindsay Hoyle is the bookies' odds on

> favourite,

> > so you might yet get to vote.

>

> He is - but I saw a Sky News interview with Harman

> and she gave me the impression it was done and

> dusted (maybe that's the impression she wanted to

> give).


John, I may be speaking too soon, but it looks like you should be fine. After 1st round of voting:


Harman - 72

Sir Lindsay Hoyle - 211

Dame Eleanor Laing - 113

Chris Bryant - 98

Rosie Winterton - 46

dulwichbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > dulwichbloke Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Lindsay Hoyle is the bookies' odds on

> > favourite,

> > > so you might yet get to vote.

> >

> > He is - but I saw a Sky News interview with

> Harman

> > and she gave me the impression it was done and

> > dusted (maybe that's the impression she wanted

> to

> > give).

>

> John, I may be speaking too soon, but it looks

> like you should be fine. After 1st round of

> voting:

>

> Harman - 72

> Sir Lindsay Hoyle - 211

> Dame Eleanor Laing - 113

> Chris Bryant - 98

> Rosie Winterton - 46


LOL - yes he won after 4 rounds with Chris Bryant in the run off and the reaction seems to be a range from 'Great' thorough 'He's a nice guy' to 'Tory stooge' (He's Labour by the way). I don't think he will be as theatrical (or as fun to watch) as Bercow.


Lots of comments I've heard on Harman I won't repeat here - she's definitely not popular with some people.

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HH putting herself forward for Speaker wasn't

> supported in the main by Momentum so guessing it

> was possibly LP MPs abstaining. It's a shame as

> she would have been effective in that role.


I got a load of abuse on twitter when I supported her candidature (based on the old NCCL/Liberty stuff).

This is not the drunk at a wedding reception that no one knows who he is but politely nods along to his incoherent ramblings, this is our Prime Minister. A Prime Minister who doesn't understand the deal he struck with the EU, states that NI will have a great deal because it will remain in a customs union with freedom of movement. Errrr, so if it's such a great deal why are you taking that all away from the rest of us?...https://twitter.com/ManufacturingNI/status/1192564837345353728
What you have to understand about Boris Johnson is that he doesn't really care about the detail of the deal. It's not that he is incapable, it's that he is indifferent. He's just interested in getting elected. None of it will effect his life in any discernible way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...