Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Trivial amount compared to government and industry money spent for preparing for a no deal, and the further costs if we went for this. Or to put into further context a small percentage on what we will spend restoring the houses of Westminster. And lower than Ress Mogg's net worth.


Although if someone had to stump up for it it should be Dave. Although unlike RM that would bankrupt our ex-PM, Can't find info on TM, but much much smaller riches.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bank of England stated that Brexit had cost ?40bn

> up to May last year, so double that at least.

> That's ?80,000,000,000,000.

> What a waste of money, Revoke A50 NOW!!...



You?ve confused your billions with trillions there Red Devil.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sigh...such a golden age. Britain booming, 240

> pence to the pound, yards, feet, inches,

> fractions, pounds, ounces, gallons, pints, fluid

> ounces etc etc

>

> None of this EU Monopoly money and metric nonsense


Jumpers for goalposts.


Spam fritters.


3 channels on the telly.


Oh yes, let?s be having you!

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We had none of this S**te when we joined in the

> 70's Welcomed with open arms.

>

> Hotel California .

>

> 'Relax,' said the night man,

> We are programmed to receive.

> You can checkout any time you like,

> But you can never leave!

>

> Foxy


Who is stopping us from leaving Foxy? Have the news got it wrong and it?s the EU who has been coming to London asking for extensions? The uk could have left in March if it had really really really really wanted to - it?s got nothing to do with the EU that parliament has decided that it doesn?t want to leave without a deal.


It?s such a simple concept, yet I?ve come across well educated people who don?t get it: The EU has no say over whether, as current EU members, we stay or leave. We can leave without a deal whenever we want, and if The UK changes its mind it can choose to stay unilaterally. What?s so difficult to understand about that? Is it the word ?unilaterally?? Maybe people don?t understand what the unilateral concept means in this context.


(Please don?t say ?it?s the backstop?, because the backstop has nothing to do with the uk ability to unilaterally leave without a deal, or revoke and stay)

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sigh...such a golden age. Britain booming, 240

> pence to the pound, yards, feet, inches,

> fractions, pounds, ounces, gallons, pints, fluid

> ounces etc etc

>

> None of this EU Monopoly money and metric nonsense


I swing both ways, can't beat a good old fashioned foot and inch, and have even been known to go the extra mile and exchange fluid ounces. But when I'm feeling really adventurous I like to dabble in grams and candelas.

Does that mean I'm bimetric, or should that be biimperial, or perhaps it's bimetricimperial, although a bit of a mouthful that last one, so to speak...

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sigh...such a golden age. Britain booming, 240

> pence to the pound, yards, feet, inches,

> fractions, pounds, ounces, gallons, pints, fluid

> ounces etc etc

>

> None of this EU Monopoly money and metric nonsense


When I studied Physics we learnt it all in metric (SI units) even though it was 1987.


One day I picked up a book in the university library describing physics in Imperial units - just WOW - and I thought what I studied was complicated.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Faisal Islam is off (Sky News) ... but then he's

> back (BBC News)

>

> One of the best Polictical hacks IMHO.

>

> https://news.sky.com/story/faisal-islam-a-front-ro

> w-seat-in-a-roller-coaster-of-mutating-political-c

> rises-11691196


Sky's news is mileskilometers better than the BBC's, far more factual than the Beeb's perceived 'balance'. Will be interesting to see whether FI changes how he reports and tweets...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...