Jump to content

Recommended Posts

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A trap specifically mentioned to me was May

> plans

> > to negotiate a Customs Union/Regulatory

> standards

> > Brexit with Corbyn then next week state due to

> > ERG/Cabinet rebellion she needs a referendum

> > between that and a No Deal Brexit (so leaving

> the

> > deal as Corbyn's deal and Labour stranded).

>

> When would this rebellion take place, before or

> after a deal is approved by Parliament?...


Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe more sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap however much you hope it's honourable )...


https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe more

> sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap

> however much you hope it's honourable )...

>

> https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-

> statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap


EU very unlikely to accept short 22nd May extension, they will offer much longer and say if UK agrees deal earlier then that's great etc. Ian Dunt has since retweeted to this effect...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe

> more

> > sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap

> > however much you hope it's honourable )...

> >

> >

> https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-

>

> >

> statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap

>

> EU very unlikely to accept short 22nd May

> extension, they will offer much longer and say if

> UK agrees deal earlier then that's great etc. Ian

> Dunt has since retweeted to this effect...

> https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/111333208776609

> 3825


Well I'm glad about that. :)

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi cella rendalharris here thankyou for asking for

> me .but just in case we fallout I just like to say

> go fcukyour self. Thankyou ted.... I mean

> rendal.😉


Reported to Admin - mainly for being illiterate.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Lordy they've hit it off (Jez and Tez that

> is).

>

> https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-je

> remy-corbyn-says-crunch-14231757


I'm not bothered with what fudge they concoct, as long as this is true...

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently there's a video .showing soldiers using

> a Jeremy corbyn poster ,for target practice

> .brigadier nick perry said the army was taking the

> matter very seriously .and would fully

> investigate,why everyone missed


RH would have made mincemeat out of you which you clearly feel. You appear to be a hateful and hate filled sort.

Cells you couldn't be more wrong there are pictures in the papers today showing what I said.OK I added the last bit as a joke.fair enough your not amused .what with all that's going on in this country brexit shambles fatal stabbings crime in general .just a little bit of black humour .some people might find funny some not .

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know the 213th was just out of prison wearing a

> tag, but as we have a bye-election in Newport in a

> labour safe seat pending I'll take it.



Says it all that you are fine with a dishonest crook just out of prison exercising what was essentially the casting vote in Parliament to pass a bill you support. If you reflect on that and change your mind, do let us know, otherwise I don't think that position reflects at all well on you (or any arguments you might voice).


It's not like a dishonest football player obviously diving to get a penalty when if it's for your team you might sometimes tempted to say 'I'll take it'. This is not a game and it is rather more serious, surely?

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I know the 213th was just out of prison wearing

> a

> > tag, but as we have a bye-election in Newport in

> a

> > labour safe seat pending I'll take it.

>

>

> Says it all that you are fine with a dishonest

> crook just out of prison exercising what was

> essentially the casting vote in Parliament to pass

> a bill you support. If you reflect on that and

> change your mind, do let us know, otherwise I

> don't think that position reflects at all well on

> you (or any arguments you might voice).

>

> It's not like a dishonest football player

> obviously diving to get a penalty when if it's for

> your team you might sometimes tempted to say 'I'll

> take it'. This is not a game and it is rather more

> serious, surely?


As one broadcaster said yesterday this is what it's like to live through history and it's not nice.

That's hardly the point now, is it?


Although we disagree on a number of things re Brexit, I hadn't thought you were that way inclined. Appears I was wrong, which is disappointing.


So, in terms of unlawful/disgraceful conduct, is there nowhere you draw the line in terms of moral disapproval, provided you get the result you want?


Seems not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ask the surgeries.  Most dentists  I have been to were child friendly.  The only one was the school dentist who'd come in a caravan and do lots of unnecessary work, which I now suffer from. 
    • Round-robin letter received this week regarding this. Main points are that the number of new homes is being reduced from 877 to 867. OK, not much change there, but.... "A reduction in the number of affordable homes from 270 (35% by habitable room) to 77 (12% by habitable room)" That's a 72% reduction in the number of affordable homes. I don't know a lot about this kind of thing, but it seems that just 77 affordable homes in a development of 867 is a massive pee-take in an area where a 1-bed flat is £400K+ if it isn't "affordable." If you're interested, the application can be viewed at https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/ ref 24/AP/2074 and there's a lot of objections to the reduction in affordable homes. The drop-in sessions are Weds 26th Feb (Peckham Library) and Mon 3rd March (All Saints Church) at 3pm. Full details attached. 24_AP_2074-FILE_COPY_-_NEIGHBOUR_NOTIFICATION_LIST-4005193.pdf
    • I noticed 4 gone in a short stretch of Bellenden Road alone this weekend. I had no idea it was to do with the tech and thought that it was a retro Beastie Boys thing. Showing my age. Sorry I can only find a Facebook link if you are too young to remember this: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=578367166664170 Totally agree that it's a bad design flaw, and I bet the actual cost of the parts to VW is minimal so they could easily cough up some of the replacement costs. It's depressing that someone can go along a street popping these things off cars with very little worry about being prosecuted.
    • Hello all, we are looking for a local child friendly dentist after deciding our old dentist doesn’t have the nack for kids, Suggestions appreciated 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...