Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Awaiting further details of her call with Boris Johnson this morning.


Early reports are Merkel said if Germany wanted to leave the EU they could but Britain would need to leave Northern Ireland behind undern EU rules and the Republic of Ireland would have a say if NI could leave.


I emphasise early reports which need clarification.

She?s put her foot in it because she has said, intentionally or otherwise


We Germany could leave the EU because nobody could stop us. We can put up borders because nobody can stop us.


You U.K. can?t leave the EU because we can stop you. Further, one of our smallest members with barely 5 million people can hold you U.K. with nearly 70 million people hostage.


So much for your recent Supreme Court nonsense of Parliamentary Supremacy. We, the EU, will tell you what to do.


(More details of the Johnson/Merkel phone call here https://news.sky.com/story/angela-merkel-tells-pm-brexit-deal-overwhelmingly-unlikely-11830601

She might have just given Boris the loophole he?s been looking for.


He should go go to the Supreme Court now and argue there?s no point asking for an extension because the U.K. can never leave the EU unless it constitutionally tears itself apart.


That?ll get the white flag wavers frothing at the mouth

Brexit is problematic because of what it is and what it means logistically - not because of remainers, the EU or anyone else


Too many people who voted to leave have changed their minds for the 17m number to have any validity especially given the turmoil leaving with no deal with cause


It has zero legitimacy. It doesn't need proceeding with - it needs to be stopped

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He should go go to the Supreme Court now and argue

> there?s no point asking for an extension because

> the U.K. can never leave the EU unless it

> constitutionally tears itself apart.


Wait... you think the Supreme Court can overturn an Act of Parliament?

stepdown Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He should go go to the Supreme Court now and

> argue

> > there?s no point asking for an extension

> because

> > the U.K. can never leave the EU unless it

> > constitutionally tears itself apart.

>

> Wait... you think the Supreme Court can overturn

> an Act of Parliament?


No stepdown. However if certain stipulations within an Act are ?void due to impossibility? then the SC could agree that is the case.


My point is although the concept is mainly to do with Contract Law, the purpose of ?forcing? the PM to write a letter requesting an extension under the Surrender/Capitulation/Humiliation Act is to prevent the U.K. leaving without a deal.


However, if Merkel?s words are as reported (and that is being questioned) then the U.K. (as an indivisible entity) can never leave.


Thus, there is no point in requesting an extension. An extension to what. The U.K. is trapped in the EU and can never leave. It can only leave if it jettisons NI and if it did that it would no longer be the U.K.


In short, Boris would not be breaking the law because it would be impossible for a PM of the U.K. to obey it.


(Can I get away with that argument M?Lud?)

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keano - that's absolute bobbins

>

> What she is saying is that "if we, Germany decide

> to leave the eu, we could without the problems the

> UK has"

>

> Not because the EU is forbidding them - but

> because of UK claim to Ireland. Germany doesn't

> have that. Thats' the comparison


I'm surprised you even believe what a source from No.10 said. It's probably Cummings. I really don't buy the shit coming out of Downing Street.

there will never be any agreement between the EU and the UK's Brexit because everything the UK wants from Brexit is NOT

allowed under the rules of the EU. Now Merkel is trying to stir up trouble by saying that NI should stay in the EU customs union....sneaky or what?

Brexit is making the EU machine face up to the fact that it is rubbish and does the poor people of the richer countries no good at all..the EU is a massive social and wealth distribution experiment but unfortunately it is the poorer people of the UK who have suffered most - but the majority of people of ED, and other well-off suburbs would not understand that as they have benefited greatly from the whole deal and expressed themselves with their over-privileged verbosity at every opportunity.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm surprised you even believe what a source from

> No.10 said. It's probably Cummings. I really don't

> buy the shit coming out of Downing Street.


The problem is overly keen 'journalists' report this nonsense in order to get a scoop, without checking accuracy, legitimacy and applying any semblance of critical thought. They are useful idiots, being played, nothing more than propaganda conduits. Expect more of the same tactic until journalists start naming these 'sources'...

there will never be any agreement between the EU and the UK's Brexit because everything the UK wants from Brexit is NOT

allowed under the rules of the EU.


Everything? really?


Now Merkel is trying to stir up trouble by saying that NI should stay in the EU customs union....sneaky or what?


Not sneaky and not new - just the same fact that has always been true that England doesn't want to address



Brexit is making the EU machine face up to the fact that it is rubbish


you have lost your mind - poor people exist in NI and Scotland as well you know - they haven't voted for this shitshow

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brexit is making the EU machine face up to the

> fact that it is rubbish and does the poor people

> of the richer countries no good at all..the EU is

> a massive social and wealth distribution

> experiment but unfortunately it is the poorer


No that's Austerity

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

it is the poorer

> people of the UK who have suffered most - but the

> majority of people of ED, and other well-off

> suburbs would not understand that as they have

> benefited greatly from the whole deal and

> expressed themselves with their over-privileged

> verbosity at every opportunity.


48% is not a metropolitan elite, just another cliched piece of bullshit from Brexiters. There's no substance just crap unconvincing cliches, deep in their hearts I think they know it too.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In short, Boris would not be breaking the law

> because it would be impossible for a PM of the

> U.K. to obey it.


Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose" of the act is as you say, nothing you raised impacts his ability to comply with the law.



uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> expressed themselves with their over-privileged

> verbosity at every opportunity.


The irony of this as a closing statement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...