Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lou. You can?t speak for most leave voters but if

> you were representative and most voters thought

> like you themnit goes some way to explaining why

> remainers say you didn?t know what you?re were

> voting for - because that?s literally what you are

> saying

>

> You can?t just cry liberal London elite at

> everything you don?t like. The governments own

> internal papers paint a very very very bad picture

> (of a country that lest we forget, lost it?s shit

> when kfc ran out of chicken)

>

> You continue to wave everything away just so you

> can say in the future ?but no one was talking

> about that then?. You will back up any half arsed

> Hitler/eu garbage but faced with actual reality

> and probability of. I deal, you don?t examine your

> record in this and think ?maybe I, Louisa, don?t

> know what I?m talking about sometimes?


John I have never once claimed to know everything. But on this, my record is exemplary. I know what I?m talking about. I want us to remain, for all the reasons you and others have stated. But I do feel you and other remainers are perpetuating this idea that the world as we know it will come crashing down around us post October 31 without a deal. The evidence just isn?t there to back up your claims. We will end up on WTO terms and probably sink into a small recession until the economy readjusted to new conditions. It wouldn?t be ideal, but equally it wouldn?t be total chaos either.


I appreciate your concerns for Ireland, Scotland and the continuity of the status quo, but much of that comes from your own entrenched belief system and is simply NOT based in reality. Sorry to say.


Louisa.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> prepared to put people through this for decades?

>

> People will die. Be it because of resumption of

> the troubles. Or food/medicine shortages

>

> And you won?t even be embarrassed? You should be

> prosecuted


Hahaha. You really make me laugh. No, people dieing doesn't make me laugh. Statements like the above really do though.


I don't know how you can even attempt to claim balanced judgement with comments like this one. Best of luck to you though.

Loutwo Wrote:

-----------------------------------

We will end up on WTO terms and

> probably sink into a small recession until the

> economy readjusted to new conditions. It wouldn?t

> be ideal, but equally it wouldn?t be total chaos

> either.

>


Please tell me what you think 'WTO terms' are Louisa, and who operates on them?

Thanks. Asking for the UK.

I can make statements like that because I pointed you to available evidence, which does forecast these things, and said if they come true it would be bad


And you basically said yeah but it?s worth it


I?m not misrepresenting you. I said if it was wrong I would be embarrassed. You said if you were wrong about these forecasts you wouldn?t even be embarrassed.

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > prepared to put people through this for

> decades?

> >

> > People will die. Be it because of resumption

> of

> > the troubles. Or food/medicine shortages

> >

> > And you won?t

>

> Hahaha. You really make me laugh. No, people

> dieing doesn't make me laugh. Statements like the

> above really do though.

>

> I don't know how you can even attempt to claim

> balanced judgement with comments like this one.

> Best of luck to you though.


Do you have any friends or relatives on long term medication at all TheCat? If so, what are their views on this?

government reports, a wide array of economic forecasts, views of other countries - not conjecture Lou


It might comfort you to chuckle into your wine and pretend you know better. But as you learned yourself - you know jack on this and you got it wrong before. If I were you I would think maybe you are wrong again


Government reports. Supposedly ?worst case scenario?. But shouldn?t even be possible


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.thejournal.ie/uk-leaked-no-deal-brexit-plan-operation-yellowhammer-4771216-Aug2019/%3famp=1

Or is the body responsible for delivering foods just ?conjecture? as well?


Are they likely to know more about how food gets to our table? Or do you know more?


https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/goves-claim-fresh-food-supplies-unaffected-by-no-deal-brexit-categorically-untrue_uk_5d6bb55ce4b0cdfe05719d77

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There really are some genuinely well respected

> posters on here, people who often make good

> balanced arguments, turning into complete doom

> mongers over this issue. Not even based in fact,

> pure conjecture. Very odd indeed.

>

> Louisa.


Ah. What things 'not based in fact' have been said recently that you object to Louisa?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> prepared to put people through this for decades?

>

> People will die. Be it because of resumption of

> the troubles. Or food/medicine shortages

>

> And you won?t even be embarrassed? You should be

> prosecuted


This remainer hysteria is getting out of hand. You?ll make yourselves poorly with these made up scare stories. I suggest a nice cup of cocoa and an early night. A good night?s sleep works wonders.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or is the body responsible for delivering foods

> just ?conjecture? as well?

>

> Are they likely to know more about how food gets

> to our table? Or do you know more?

>

> https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/goves-claim

> -fresh-food-supplies-unaffected-by-no-deal-brexit-

> categorically-untrue_uk_5d6bb55ce4b0cdfe05719d77


I think there must be people who have all their lives longed to say 'The British Retail Association?! Don't talk to me about the British Retail Association! What do they know about British Retail?!'. That's the only explanation I can come up with.


This made me chuckle.


Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loutwo Wrote:

> -----------------------------------

> We will end up on WTO terms and

> > probably sink into a small recession until the

> > economy readjusted to new conditions. It

> wouldn?t

> > be ideal, but equally it wouldn?t be total

> chaos

> > either.

> >

>

> Please tell me what you think 'WTO terms' are

> Louisa, and who operates on them?

> Thanks. Asking for the UK.



Well for a start, if we fall back on our existing membership of the WTO the Irish border issue disappears overnight. We will pursue a independent trade policy and ?go rogue? by keeping the border open to free trade whether the WTO/EU likes it or not. Current forecasts suggest they would have little room to complain or impose further tariffs until at least 2022, by which time new trade agreements would already be finalised with other countries. I think some food will entail 0% tariffs initially, and some goods such as cars will be closer to 10%.


Louisa.

Keano. You can join thecat


Read what I said at 9:46


I had only pointed out what would happen if predictions came true. I said if they didn?t come true I would be embarrassed. But if they do some true then I won?t be making anything up


If those predictions (including governments own) come true. People. Will. Die


And if you response to that is ?I won?t even be embarrassed? then yes you are a sociopath

Louisa. I see a couple of issues there.


Firstly. No country in the world currently trades on WTO terms alone. There's a reason for that.


Secondly, that wouldn't work on the Irish border. See attached. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/17/checks-on-both-sides-of-irish-border-mandatory-under-no-deal-brexit

The WTO has no mechanism for expelling members based on them making an exception for a open border into a existing single market, none whatsoever. And do you really think the EU will force us to have a border on the island of Ireland going against the Good Friday Agreement, therefore threatening peace and stability in Northern Ireland? It just won?t happen. They will tolerate a open border for a number of years whilst we sort trade arrangements out. We all know this. And it?s not sticking two fingers up to anyone, it?s making the best of a not so ideal situation.


Louisa.

Even if the eu was to tolerate an open border it?s the uk that?s having the hissy fit about control of its borders


Eu citizens can freely flow into the uk across this non existent border and what? The media and leavers won?t mind?


Seems like a ridiculous risk and price to pay for zero gain and a lot of loss

But Louisa, you were saying that the UK, under WTO terms, would decide to unilaterally drop all tariffs on the Irish Border. No it wouldn't. That would kill our own farming industry. Even if we didn't care about breaking the rules of an organisation (the WTO) in which Brexiters claim they wish to play a leading role in future.

Jenny, on Ireland, there is no mechanism to prevent or fine the United Kingdom from not imposing tariffs on goods between us and the single market. None which would take affect before 2022, as I previously explained. It?s a fantasy.


We would not be exclusively trading on WTO rules, we already have existing trade agreements and others in the pipeline about to be signed separately from the EU. And again, we will continue to keep a free and open border with the single market with 0% tariffs.. whether the EU/WTO like it or not. Simple as that really.


Louisa.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As for lou?s WTO fantasies, what can you even say?

> She has the f@@@ing GALL to say we are making

> stuff up and she comes out with this nonsense.

> Where does she get such ideas? Where?



Your rage is really becoming comical/farcical. Please carry on.


I'll just say this. Louisa said that many statements being made were not 'based in fact'.


A forecast or prediction is NOT, repeat NOT, fact.

A) Louisa and her posts have very little to do with facts


B) no one is say predictions are the same as facts. What I am saying is that the serious predictions about the consequences of a damaging Brexit are not random plucks out of the air but based upon people whose job it is to know. This doesn?t mean they will happen. They could very well be wrong. But as already discussed the consequences of them being right v wrong are very different

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...