Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Boris & Fox are to join forces in a leadership

> > takeover

>

> Possible misuse of the word 'leadership'?


I use it loosely, bearing in mind Trump is 'leader of the free world'

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Despite all that, in a hypothetical second

> > referendum, would people still vote Brexit?

>

> Quite possibly. Many people, rightly or wrongly,

> still do actually believe Brexit will make their

> lives better.

>

> Which is why Brexiters are so very against the

> concept of a referendum on the final deal - once

> people actually see what the future really is,

> they may not be so keen.


I think the result would be pretty similar, based on personal experience and anecdote (and things like this thread). There was a poll 6 months ago that had numbers more or less the same.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > miga Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Despite all that, in a hypothetical second

> > > referendum, would people still vote Brexit?

> >

> > Quite possibly. Many people, rightly or

> wrongly,

> > still do actually believe Brexit will make

> their

> > lives better.

> >

> > Which is why Brexiters are so very against the

> > concept of a referendum on the final deal -

> once

> > people actually see what the future really is,

> > they may not be so keen.

>

> I think the result would be pretty similar, based

> on personal experience and anecdote (and things

> like this thread). There was a poll 6 months ago

> that had numbers more or less the same.


Not now - Brexit hasn't worked it's way through yet.


Another poll once we see the true result in 2019 or 2020.


ironically for the people to see what Brexit is like it has to be delivered.

As a Remainer it definitely feels like being stuck between a rock and a hard place. I sometimes feel like, ok, let's have the Hard Brexit and the shitstorm that follows, at least that way the Brexit idea can be put to bed once and for all. With a soft Brexit it'll be, ''well. it wasn't so bad after all, let's stick with it etc''. Even with a 2nd ref on the terms of a deal, we'll never get back in with the same benefits we currently have. We're going to be worse off whatever happens...

Of course they think it's ok to fuck up the country; they won't have to deal with it.


Wish I was surprised by that, but I'm not. They're totally happy to patronise and be condescending to younger people who will have to clean up the mess they've made, and have no idea of what they're doing.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And yet people had a go at Theresa May for

> suggesting the removal of the triple lock on

> pensions and the end of the universal winter fuel

> allowance. I thought both ideas were eminently

> sensible, so long as the very poorest pensioners

> would be no worse off.


Maybe sensible - but I don't really mind making sure average pensioners

are doing OK - as hopefully we'll all be pensioners eventually..


But I don't understand there adherence to us as being an empire - older

people when I was 12 used to think that but these people are only 20

years older than me.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course they think it's ok to @#$%& up the

> country; they won't have to deal with it.

>

> Wish I was surprised by that, but I'm not. They're

> totally happy to patronise and be condescending to

> younger people who will have to clean up the mess

> they've made, and have no idea of what they're

> doing.


But these are the Woodstock generation - how did it come to this.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's nothing compared to how the Kevin Myers'

> BBC article in the Times made it through to print.

> Staggering...


When I worked in media they made the sub editors redundant.


I mean does Donald Trump get somebody to check his tweets :)

Ireland looks more and more like it's had enough of Brexiteers threatening it's economy and is getting more forceful.


https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/ultrasoft-brexit-called-for-to-honour-dublin-north-agreements-1.3172831


If we start splitting NI off from the UK we're heading towards a United Ireland at some point in the future IMHO ?.

I posed that hypothetical question last week...What if no plan is the Hard Brexiteers' plan?

This article highlights how difficult it's going to be to get any form of Brexit through a Commons vote. Which could mean that No Deal or a 2nd Referendum are the only viable options left... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/03/second-brexit-referendum-case-getting-stronger-political-deadlock-life-raft

So an upfront cost of at least 36 billion in order to win the right to be poorer.


What a good thing many leave voters (61 per cent I think the last poll suggests) now say they don't mind taking an economic hit to leave the EU.


So, putting aside the long term ongoing costs they'll be happy to meet, a one off payment will be demanded shortly. 61 per cent of 17.4 million people gives us 10.6 million people willing to foot the bill. By my calculations that means a very reasonable initial payment of 3.3 million. Some may not have the cash to hand but low interest rates and their willingness (as shown in recent polls) that their families should also take an economic hit means some kind of cross-generational loan scheme should ensure that by the time their great great great grandchildren come along they'll only be paying the long term ongoing costs.

I can't read all of that pay-for article, so all I can gather from it is that the UK has to pay the 'divorce bill' before meaningful talks can commence, but hasn't that been the EU's position all along since the Ref? Why would that be the real reason there was a GE?...

The word around Whitehall for several weeks now has been that the UK govt is willing to pay ?10bn per year for three years on which we still have access to the Single Market during the 'translational phase', plus a final payment. Quite how this squares with the ending of free movement in 2019 I don't know, but perhaps the EU is willing to deal over that.


I think May hopes to win a solid majority in order to be able to override any Remain rebellion and force through a hard deal, but now has to face up to being willing to be flexible. Could be wrong though...

The general consensus at the time was that May was being opportunistic in calling the election due to the polls, and indeed it was a chance to give herself a clear majority/mandate to proceed with Brexit on her terms i.e. ''No deal is better than a bad deal''. There was also the bonus that with a clear majority they would likely serve the full 5 years unopposed, thus buying themselves an extra 2 years post-Brexit. I'm not sure why the 'divorce bill' would be the 'real reason' to call the GE. May said many times about there not being a need for a GE, and the 'divorce bill' was well known when she said this...

Marr was commenting on the headline and in his tweet said it was a major problem for the Tories. I think it's the fact that they knew a large brexit bill was coming that they thought getting a bigger majority as most expected they would, would help ease the breaking of this news.


So it's more to do with the amount of it. The foreign secretary did after all say the EU would have to whistle for their money. It's interesting that this news breaks when they're all on holiday.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> So it's more to do with the amount of it. The

> foreign secretary did after all say the EU would

> have to whistle for their money. It's interesting

> that this news breaks when they're all on holiday.


Yes. Isn't this the first time there's been an official acknowledgement of an actual figure? They've been happy to be vague before, which has allowed the 'we won't pay a penny' tone of Boris' 'Go whistle' comments. They must have known that once real figures started to be talked about they'd be in trouble and hence wanted to go to the polls early.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...