Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. We don't live in London and have only been to ED a couple of times but enough to know we like it there and have read good things about the place from a lot of people. Since we don't know the area too well though how's East Dulwich Grove as a street for a family? We have 2 small kids and the property we have found is opposite the hospital. Any thoughts? We like that it's a short walk away from Lordship Lane and train station for hubby to go into the office a few times a week. TIA
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/156210-east-dulwich-grovethoughts/
Share on other sites

Generally, East Dulwich is great - a fantastic place to bring up a family

EDG - nothing wrong with it, but it is a busy main road. A new 2ndary school is being built on the hospital site, which would be great for you in a few years time, but may cause some disruption in the short-term

East Dulwich is a great place for kids. Also Peckham Rye is becoming much nicer, lots to do, better transport connections and slightly better prices. I would avoid living on a really busy road like EDG, plenty of houses on backstreets which will be better for families.
I love it too. I was initially cautious of main road, but quickly ceased to notice much and benefits: more space for your buck, handy for transport (and free on street parking), LLane, Dulwich Village and Park 10 mins walk away...Several families with young children on the Grove.

Lived there for 3 years (now moved away). Very convenient - both for ED station, but also 37 bus / proximity to Herne Hill station compared with rest of ED when Southern Rail failing. Also walkable via Greenway to King's / Denmark Hill for the more energetic.

Yes, noisy compared with other roads we'd lived on - the 37 runs all night, and there is more night-time foot traffic than some places, presumably due to proximity to Lordship Lane.

Parking - not always easy, though free and no permits. We lived in the section opposite the hospital and had repeated problems, often ending up in the side roads behind them.

Hospital is generally a very trouble free neighbour, with so much of the site being out of use, but as others mention there are school building plans in the medium term.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...