Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have any advice (good or bad) on Residential Care Homes in or around Southwark?


It is looking like our 90 year old father will have to go into residential care very soon. We were hoping for any recommendations for individual care homes or ones to avoid.


Any advice on private homes verses council homes would also be very much appreciated.


Thanks.

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but they vary in the levels of crap . In my experience when old people enter residential care or hospital they will rapidly go downhill. Keep him at home and buy in outside support funded by Social Services would be my suggestion, if you cant do this, make sure someone who cares about him goes in to check on him frequently, check that he is actually eating and not losing weight, being cleaned adequately, wearing his own clothes not someone elses etc etc, dont settle for a crap service, ever .


The Mail ran an article on this a few days ago, sorry i cant remember how to post a link . If anyone does have any positive care home experiences anywhere i would be very interested to hear this too .

While I agree with the "care at home" concept there comes a time when it is impractical. We did this for nearly four years, with support of care workers and other support services but eventually my father in law needed 24/7 care and no amount of local effort could create a seamless service necessary.


My father in law spent the last 14 months of his life in a BUPA nursing home in Blackheath - Westcombe Park Nursing Home. The staff were very caring and supportive. It wasn't cheap, but seemed good value for money, We funded it through a combination of social service payment, father-in-law's pension and family contributions - it ran out at about ?2,400 a calendar month. He had an ensuite room, full nursing care, good - if somewhat institutional - food, regular entertainments, parties and outings - to which the family were always invited. As an always solitary man he often preferred to take his meals in his room and not join in the events - but this was OK, no forced jollity I'm glad to say.


Vacancies occur approximately once a month as residents pass away - literally dead mens shoes.

I'm in the same process myself. 97-yr-old grandmother, suffering for some years from vascular dementia, multiple strokes etc., and she has already been through the mill of part-time day-care, at-home care with nursing help etc., and now the family is just about unable to cope any more.


Unfortunately the placement will not be in the UK (but in her country, without much of a public social service). But I'd really welcome any advice on homes, what to be looking out for.

Have heard great reviews of tower bridge nursing home recently from ambulance staff, a while ago they were regularily called there by staff who knew nothing about the residents, now they say they are called infrequently and when they are the staff know all about the resident and can give a good history apparently had has improved immensly.

This website is good for searching all available care homes.


Care homes


From various elderly relatives & friends' elderly relatives:


The Hill House, Sydenham Hill. In the home for over a year & seems to be receiving very good care.


Peartree Nursing Home Sydenham Road I've only visited it once from what I could see the care was good, very clean and lots of activities.


Castlebar Sydenham Hill - did have a bad reputation but I have heard it has improved


The Elms Barry Road. This is a church (Baptist) home so they take residents from a christian background only. Very good care.

My mother is in Castlebar. All round good performance except she recently had to be taken to Kings with dehydration and a kidney infection. Coincidentally the Mail has a story about care homes and old people dying of thirst earlier this week.


Castlebar could be accused of being negligent but keeping old people hydrated is a nightmare so I don't blame them


We looked at The Elms in Barry Road. It's not as flash (or expensive) as Castlebar but it seemed quite cheery. It's co run with the Baptist church


Earlier she had been in Oatlands in Anerley and Homelands in Penge, both run by the same family. Me no likey. PM me if you want more details

No experince of London care homes but my father until he died in December had been in 2 care homes depending on his needs for 5 years, so we know what to look for!. We looked at every home there was possible in N Devon, and the first bit of advice is go unannounced. That way you really see exactly what is going on. Also, as you go in, have a good smell. In the majority of homes we saw, all we could smell was wee, not pleasant for anyone. Look at the residents clothes - have they got the remnants of their weetabix down their fronts? If your relative does go into a home, make sure all their clothes are very clearly labelled, and can be boiled - we lost count of the clothes that were boiled to death, or actually went 'missing', especially good quality clothes. Small items of personal belongings went 'missing' as well, including his watch, that he'd had for 50 years, all very upsetting. And this was in the best home we could find that was accessible. For health care, dependant on his needs, there is the 'Nursing care allowance' that comes from the NHS not DSS, and is means tested - as Daddy had dementia, had had 4 strokes and 5 heart attacks he was eligable, but you do have to fight for it! None of this is easy, and is very upsetting for all the family, as you know its the best thing, but you will feel dreadfully guilty, especially when all they ask is to be allowed to go home. HP

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



> Castlebar could be accused of being negligent but

> keeping old people hydrated is a nightmare so I

> don't blame them



Blimey steveo that is very gracious of you , id have had their guts for garters .


Really the staff should have a hydration program in place, including helping residents with drinking,( assisting and encouraging drinking warmed drinks even through a straw) offering a variety of beverages and providing drinks not only at mealtimes but in between meals.Also make sure that they monitor residents weight and assess them if their physical condition or mental state changes. Absolutely everything should be monitored and recorded.

Daizie - Steveo was just being realistic. We had major problems with my father-in-law over hydration. My wife is a nurse and fully understood the need but unless we force fed him liquid he would just not drink. Even when it was patently obvious that he needed to - dry chapped lips, urinary infections, dark urine, difficulty in swallowing and so on. He would acknowledge the need but short term memory loss and mild dementia simply meant he forgot. Even the best 24/7 care will experience problems with this particular aspect. That said - it is a problem that shouldn't escalate to the point where hospital care is required.

All care homes have their good and bad points.it also depends on the resident and also their families, expectations.

Most staff in care homes, including nurses, are poorly paid,some are happy in their work despite this, the owners of the homes need to make a profit otherwise they cannot survive themselves. Never make an appointment to visit a care home, just turn up. Ideally after 9.30/10 am is a good time, all residents having been washed, dressed and breakfasted by this time. Avoid going after 7 pm when many residents starting going to bed. If you visit a home on Tuesday afternoon and like it, go back at the weekend as frequently different staff. Whilst the building appearance is important - it is the staff that make the home- how long have they been there, their manner with residents, do they treat each resident with respect and individually. Is the TV in the lounge on continiously , what activities take place and how frequently, will staff take residents to local shops or churches. How do staff treat visitors. As a professional person, I have visited several hundred home over the past 15 years throughout the country, and judge how staff treat me as a visitor as an indication of their care.


One home I visited in Essex - I had travelled from ED via train to the place and found that no buses ran so had to get a taxi for about 8 miles. Dying to go to the loo when arrived ( the train did not have a loo nor did the station) I introduced myself to staff, showed my ID and who I was visiting, and asked for the visitor's loo. I very begrudgingly shown the loo, saw my gentleman and I had some concerns that his wheelchair was a liitle wide for the doorway (massive indents in doorframe, dents in wheelchair. Staff showed me how they got him and and out room by 'bumping the chair' up and down (scratching it even more)poor old boy petrified at being bumped. met with staff who were concerned more about him dying and how long the local authority would pay for his room after death. Was there at the home for a good 3 hours, not offered a cup of tea or glass of water, I asked them to call a taxi to collect me, they refused. eventually they gave me a phone book and told me to do it myself. In the days before mobiles, they eventually allowed me to use a phone. Having left ED at 8 am and getting back to office around 3.30 pm without having a drink all day (no shops or cafes near either station) I was not a happy bunny.


I called the old boy's daughter and asked her what she felt about the home and discovered that they way they treated me, was similiar to how they treated some resident's families. I advised her to remove her father and find an alternative home. Wrote a pretty damming report which I sent to the managers and Essex Social Services.


This was the only time I have had a very bad experience at a care home, and often relate this tale to new staff - how they as professionals are treated, can often be a reflection on how relatives and residents are treated. Obviously if they go the other extreme and fawn over the professional,one also queries how residents/relatives are treated.


My aunt spent 2- 3 happy years in The Elms before she died, very good management and staff, very caring.


I am now in the position of having to decide whether to have my frail 87 year old mother live with us and have a care package or let her go to a nursing home. My mother does not want to do either, but needs someone to be with her the majority of the day as she cannot transfer independently or care for herself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
    • Another recommendation for Lorraine  - if you need help over the holidays, she still has a small amount of availability. Couldn’t recommend her more highly, she’s brilliant with our cat. Message her on 07718 752208 for more details re pricing etc.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...