Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Birth is brutal. But it IS possible to have a lovely cup of tea afterwards with your newborn surrounded by your family and lovely midwives. Don't give up the dream!!


And second Belle in saying that a transfer in an emergency if you live very close to hospital can be as quick from home as in the hospital.


And finally, as regards the 'safety' of hospital - my mother who delivered me by c-section in a private hospital nearly died of septicaemia after she developed in infection. Hospitals create their own unique risks.


PS for someone with sod all knowledge of vbacs I've had rather a lot to say on this thread...sorry...

very well put Belle & lEDF, may I suggest that new mother and Forgetful consider starting a 'reasons why you should never consider VBAC or homebirth' thread so that those who want to scare themselves witless with other people's anecdotal horror stories can do so in the appropriate place.


"It is crazy to consider increasing the risks associated with giving birth" - I agree wholeheartedly with this comment (was it NM or Forgetful?) and that's why I strongly support well, healthy women with straightforward pregnancies and no adverse indications to consider homebirth. The statistics speak for themselves.


VBAC is slightly different. I'm inclined to agree with NM that if your last birth was CS & you're wanting to try for a VBAC then a hospital consultant led unit is the safest place to do it. If however you've already had a successful VBAC and are hoping for another then with the right support you might be able to consider a midwife led unit or even doing it at home. It completely depends on your individual circumstances.


Finally, "Birth is not coughing and having a newborn next to you for most women" - Why on earth would you say this new mother - do you really think that anyone, anyone at all is stupid enough to think this? What an insult to the intelligence of the people reading this. That comment along with your ill informed & alarmist reflections really did make my blood boil.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
    • Was the driver still with it when the police arrived?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...