Jump to content

tv licence an iniquitous tax

acumenman

By acumenman
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

acumenman

acumenman

Posted
Posted

The other day the tv licence arrived and I deliberated about paying this iniquitous tax, as I rarely watch the BBC as it gets up my nose to watch the news they produce with all the spin.


Cricket gets more air time than serious matters.


There seems to be a surfeit of idiots at the BBC worrying about how a programme is delivered without considering the lack of content and the appalling bias.


Every childrens programme it seems is fronted by an alien to these shores, which is political correctness gone bizarrely wrong.


The money spent collected from us mugs who do pay the tax or licence, is wasted on unnecessary administrative and managerial staff, whilst the true creative talent is hopelessly underfunded.


It works out we pay around ?12 per month for this shower for two tv channels and a half dozen radio networks.


Sky for ?21 gives a hundred channels and more radio networks than one knows what to do with.


The difference is I can choose to pay Sky if I want their channels but with the BBC you have to have your licence whether you watch them or not.


It should be a matter of choice you either pay Sky or the BBC.


GRRRRR!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15513-tv-licence-an-iniquitous-tax/
Share on other sites
Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But with sky you get adverts interrupting your

> movies and programmes. The licence fee is what

> stops the BBC having advertising.


Sky don't show adverts during movies. Also if you have a Sky+ box you can record things and fast forward through the adverts. I still like the BBC though.

taper

taper

Posted
Posted

The religious bias sometimes gets up my nose. And the fawning treatment given to the Establishment. Aliens to these shores? I'm not a fan of Terry Wogan or Rolf Harris, but I can see their charms. Life without R4 though is unimaginable. As is a broadcasting landscape populated only by Sky and ITV.


So pay up I say. It's your patriotic duty.

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

> It works out we pay around ?12 per month for this

> shower for two tv channels and a half dozen radio

> networks.


I have one telly and one freeview box. With those I am able to watch dozens of all manner of channels etc. (including a Russian one and Al Jazeera) for the cost of the TV licence. Unfortunately I don't have the time as I'm always on here, but I think that, if I did, it would be fair value.


> Sky for ?21 gives a hundred channels and more

> radio networks than one knows what to do with.


At the end of the day, there are only so many channels you can watch. I guess it boils down to personal preference too. Some people, for example, have Sky purely for the live football matches.

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted

acumenman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> It works out we pay around ?12 per month for this

> shower for two tv channels and a half dozen radio

> networks.


Are you living in a 1990s time warp?


BBC4 is the only reason I still have a TV set. I barely look at the other hundred or so channels on Freeview.


Sky is only viable because Sky Sport pays for everything else.

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

> Op: You appear to have forgotten about BBC

> Websites: weather/ news/ Kids Cbbc/ Cbeebies

> amazing websites educationally.


Does the licence cover the websites too? I didn't realise this:-$


I suppose that makes sense though. If you don't own a TV but watch something on iplayer for example...

HAL9000

HAL9000

Posted
Posted

I think (so don't hold me to this) that the TV Licence only covers reception\recording\watching programs at the time that they are officially broadcast (on all channels).


It does not cover content available via iPlayer or catch-up services offered by cable service providers (or BBC websites) - therefore, no TV Licence is required to view such content.

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted

The licence fee pays for all BBC services and channels, offline and online (and now will include the World Service too, previously paid for by the FCO).


A licence is not required for catch-up services/narrowcasting, but only for when a programme is broadcast (transmitted live on TV and simultaneously via iplayer etc.).

indiepanda

indiepanda

Posted
Posted

So much of what is on the various Sky channels was made by the BBC in the first place, from old comedies on GOLD, QI and Top Gear, to lifestyle shows and various others.


If you don't watch the sports channels (which I don't) there isn't actually that much original programming on Sky.


The BBC web site may be free to access regardless of whether or not you have a TV licence, but if none of us had one, there would be no web site. I visit it on a more than daily basis and couldn't be without it.


If you travel overseas you will find the BBC the envy of countries worldwide, and in places like New Zealand, again many programs are sourced from the BBC.


Whilst not everything on it is to my taste, I wouldn't be without it. I am quite happy paying my licence fee.

LadyDeliah

LadyDeliah

Posted
Posted

Their educational content on the website is really useful. My friend's daughter was in a failing secondary school and managed to pass all if her GCSE's using the bitesize revision stuff on the BNC website.


The BBC is brilliant in so many ways. Can't see Sky doing any if these things for free.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

I'm not averse to a bit of BBC-bashing myself, but a world without the BBC would be freaky and frightening.


Seeing that most people - given the choice - would lazily accept a crap free alternative in place of a superior product which they had to motivate themselves to pay for (see 'The Metro' etc); the BBC forces a huge swathe of the population to absorb comparatively quality information (eg current affairs) instead of Goldenballs. That alone is worth a puny hundred and fifty quid a year - especially when you consider how a substantial proportion of the rest of your substantial taxes get flushed.


The people who beat their chest about having to pay the TV licence are usually the ones we need to have it there for.



And QI isn't made by the BBC.

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

I don't think so.


Where does it say you need a licence to watch iplayer DJ? I think you owe HAL an apology and Ladymuck too! It doesn't even say it on the back of the licence either.



DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAL you are incorrect I'm afraid. You DO need a TV

> licence if you watch content on iplayer/ internet

> or a mobile phone. It states it on the back of the

> licence.

jumpinjackflash

jumpinjackflash

Posted
Posted

acumenman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> It should be a matter of choice you either pay Sky

> or the BBC.

>

>


totally agree with you on this. I have SKY and would happily allow all my BBC channels be blocked than pay ?145 (or whatever it is) per year to watch the crap on BBC. Cannot remember the last time I actually watched anything on the BBC channels. Don't mind the adverts - gives me time to make a cup of tea or go for a piddle!

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where does it say you need a licence to watch

> iplayer DJ? I think you owe HAL an apology and

> Ladymuck too! It doesn't even say it on the back

> of the licence either.


Thanks Narnia. I should say that I didn't check (more fool me)...


But, of course, sincerest apologies dear HAL. x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Bin lorry overturned, Townley Road

      By Sue · Posted

      At least it can't/shouldn't have been going very fast, if it was turning a corner?
    • Sue
      Gowlett Road

      By Sue · Posted

      It always amazes me how people choose to live near a pub which is already there, and then make life difficult for the pub because of noise! So it's great that Lulark is checking it out beforehand! Hoopers (R.I.P.) had the same problem. People moved in next to the pub and then complained about noise .... People have different thresholds for noise, so probably the best thing would be to go to the house  at different times of the week/day/evening and see whether the noise level is acceptable to you inside (if possible) and outside the  house (in the garden, if it has one?)? You could also ask the pub what events (if any) they hold during the week, and check out the size of their garden? Noise from the garden will obviously be more in the Summer and when the weather is fine. You could also ask them if they have had any complaints about noise from nearby residents? I imagine they would be happy to tell you, because they won't want anyone else moving in who is likely to cause them grief 😅 Also, they may have a time after which people have to be inside the pub rather than in the garden, so you could ask them about that. Gowlett Road is a nice area to live (and the pub is also a nice friendly pub!) . Good luck!
    • ed_pete
      Bin lorry overturned, Townley Road

      By ed_pete · Posted

      I'm guessing it must have been early. I passed about 7:30 and there was no signs of police or ambulance only the recovery truck.  My guess is that the bin lorry was approaching from the JAGS direction, heading down the hill, turned right, overcooked it and tipped.  Hopefully no one was seriously injured though I imagine those in the lorry must been hurt.
    • alex_b
      Gowlett Road

      By alex_b · Posted

      We live on Adys (just round the corner). The area is safe and we’re happy for our child to walk around by themselves. There are occasional phone snatchings outside East Dulwich Station but I don’t think it’s massively different from most of London.    The Gowlett is pretty tame, there are tables outside so there will be some noise of course. We have friends on Gowlett and they’ve never complained about the noise. I seem to recall that a couple moved in to the road and made life pretty difficult for The Gowlett for a while over noise, if you hunt around you should find the thread.  I guess it’s whether you’re looking at a house straight across the road from the pub or further down the street but overall it’s a nice area, convenient for transport and the schools are decent.  Good luck. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...