Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Ms Shambles,


No, this certainly does not sound like a boy name on reflection. My apologies again. I am afraid I am having an axious week, not getting lost of sleep. It is affecting my judgement.


I apologise again Mr Crystalclear, but Beauty Plus - the Salon on Forest Hill Road do a facial with your name that claims to enliven a tired complexion - apparently. I am sorry about that, I thought you were the lady who owns the salon - trying to give your establishment a plug. I went in there for a pedicure and I was lucky that I got out with my facial muscles in tact - she was talking about zapping this and injecting that. All manner of medical procedures are at their disposal without so much as a medical qualification!

Dear Miss Cosmopolitan,


I believe Mr Batdog is just a darling, although I would imagine he is in his very early forties. He leads me to believe he is single (and I would be crushed - I must admit, if he became affectionate with another girl). In my minds eye, he is six foot six, with a perfect physique and a small dog.


Mr Crystalclear is single, and is a throbing testosterone filled young whipper snapper (I believe under thirty) who has a sharp sense of humour, and is really quite artistic - although he is unsure as yet as to whether he is free to love another (he is recently single). He has the best taste though.


Mr Mockney Piers is spoken for, but is empathic and sensitive, and is dashing with terrific manners and gentlemanly ways. I love him like a brother (step). Huguenot is a passionate man, who can get rather fiery but I believe spoken for too!


Mr Beatnic too is spoken for and extremely dashing. Bob S - well obviously an attractive intellectual sensitive man, but is he single - and will he be there?


My husband has a lovely friend who is single and under forty - a veritable 'captain of industry', but I have come unstuck trying to matchmake for him in the past. He travels endlessly, and enjoys the finer things in life. If I knew your exact requirements, I could take a look in the shoe box under my bed, I once kept extensive records of eligable single men...

Hey cosmopoliton,


D-Mum is obviously misleading you.


I am nearly 80 years in "human terms" as I was born in the early 90's and I am about 60cm tall, even though I am a very fit and cute dog, so I do NOT match your requirements...Sorry... Also I do not have a dog, I have 2 of them for my own safety, to be precise 2 very ugly looking Rottweilers BUT very well trained and efficient. (tu)

However D-Mum's husband is a very handsome and "loaded" guy. So he could come out on that night for a bit of "diversion" and meet you all, beautiful people of ED, while I stay at home ( his ) and "look" after his wife and family with "devoted" care...

DEAL ? >:D<

Hi

The item about this seems to have got rather a long way down the list, so I quick note will bring it to the top :)


If you wish to tick the "No publicity" option, you may be glad to know that I will be a little late (around 9). So you can have a few drinks before I snap, name and shame on Flickr. Of course if anyone else would like to share the role of self appointed joint official photographer, please go ahead.


And I have just remembered my camera battery is a bit thirsty..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But they were going to cut down a tree that had no notice on it ? Either way thank goodness people intervened. My total lack of confidence in Southwark tree dept is justified it would seem… 
    • Hopefully the confusion won’t lead to injury. 
    • To clarify a few points- I didn't just happen to be passing, I saw the workmen setting up equipment worryingly close to the tree from my front window, so put my shoes on and headed over there as quickly as possible just in case. Unfortunately they had already lopped a few branches off in the two minutes it took me to get there. Although I didn't see them attach a notice, the wording on the notice pictured above has the same terminology that they used with me - fungal brackets - so presumably it was them. I have no idea who removed the sign, or why. Also worth mentioning that they were third party contractors, carrying out work orders from the council. I'm a bit confused by the 'mistaken tree' comments, as Councillor Renata Hamvas posted on a Facebook thread that she had raised the issue with the relevant council officers, and that the response she received is that the tree does have a fungal infection. So there seems to be conflicting info there, and I'm concerned that the tree is still in danger.
    • To be fair, do we know who put the notice on the wrong tree? The people wielding chainsaws almost certainly won't be the experts  who identify  the problems with the trees? They just go along and hack down what they're told to hack down? I might be wrong, but whilst actual tree surgery needs expertise, I wouldn't have thought hacking down a whole tree did? Apart from knowing how to use a chainsaw, obviously.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...