Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Ms Shambles,


No, this certainly does not sound like a boy name on reflection. My apologies again. I am afraid I am having an axious week, not getting lost of sleep. It is affecting my judgement.


I apologise again Mr Crystalclear, but Beauty Plus - the Salon on Forest Hill Road do a facial with your name that claims to enliven a tired complexion - apparently. I am sorry about that, I thought you were the lady who owns the salon - trying to give your establishment a plug. I went in there for a pedicure and I was lucky that I got out with my facial muscles in tact - she was talking about zapping this and injecting that. All manner of medical procedures are at their disposal without so much as a medical qualification!

Dear Miss Cosmopolitan,


I believe Mr Batdog is just a darling, although I would imagine he is in his very early forties. He leads me to believe he is single (and I would be crushed - I must admit, if he became affectionate with another girl). In my minds eye, he is six foot six, with a perfect physique and a small dog.


Mr Crystalclear is single, and is a throbing testosterone filled young whipper snapper (I believe under thirty) who has a sharp sense of humour, and is really quite artistic - although he is unsure as yet as to whether he is free to love another (he is recently single). He has the best taste though.


Mr Mockney Piers is spoken for, but is empathic and sensitive, and is dashing with terrific manners and gentlemanly ways. I love him like a brother (step). Huguenot is a passionate man, who can get rather fiery but I believe spoken for too!


Mr Beatnic too is spoken for and extremely dashing. Bob S - well obviously an attractive intellectual sensitive man, but is he single - and will he be there?


My husband has a lovely friend who is single and under forty - a veritable 'captain of industry', but I have come unstuck trying to matchmake for him in the past. He travels endlessly, and enjoys the finer things in life. If I knew your exact requirements, I could take a look in the shoe box under my bed, I once kept extensive records of eligable single men...

Hey cosmopoliton,


D-Mum is obviously misleading you.


I am nearly 80 years in "human terms" as I was born in the early 90's and I am about 60cm tall, even though I am a very fit and cute dog, so I do NOT match your requirements...Sorry... Also I do not have a dog, I have 2 of them for my own safety, to be precise 2 very ugly looking Rottweilers BUT very well trained and efficient. (tu)

However D-Mum's husband is a very handsome and "loaded" guy. So he could come out on that night for a bit of "diversion" and meet you all, beautiful people of ED, while I stay at home ( his ) and "look" after his wife and family with "devoted" care...

DEAL ? >:D<

Hi

The item about this seems to have got rather a long way down the list, so I quick note will bring it to the top :)


If you wish to tick the "No publicity" option, you may be glad to know that I will be a little late (around 9). So you can have a few drinks before I snap, name and shame on Flickr. Of course if anyone else would like to share the role of self appointed joint official photographer, please go ahead.


And I have just remembered my camera battery is a bit thirsty..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...