Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Haven't noticed them doing it - is this just recently? The lights are supposed to change in their favour as they approach, from a sensor in the bus lane, maybe it's malfunctioning. Assuage your annoyance by reflecting that if it was working the lights would be turning red against you so you'd have to stop anyway...
Walked by there three times today and it seemed to be working a treat - bus lane light only turning green when a bus was coming, switching to red as soon as the bus passed, didn't seem to be being triggered by bicycles (I regularly cycle down there and I've never noticed it switching for me!). Perhaps it needs some tweaking but from today's observations seemed to be working fine.
On a bike you can easily clock 40 mph with or without a green light at the bottom of the hill, and that's without even pedalling - depending on your bike of course. Buses can do what they want and cars are continually subject to queuing for no reason with engines running. All types of vehicles then brake like crazy (even some bikes) when the lights go red after the bridge. It's a stupid f!!ckin' system for everyone.

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a bike you can easily clock 40 mph with or

> without a green light at the bottom of the hill,

> and that's without even pedalling - depending on

> your bike of course. Buses can do what they want

> and cars are continually subject to queuing for no

> reason with engines running. All types of vehicles

> then brake like crazy (even some bikes) when the

> lights go red after the bridge. It's a stupid

> f!!ckin' system for everyone.


Sorry to be pedantic "cars are subject to queuing for no reason" erm... surely a red light is a red light and is a reason even if it's perhaps not a justified reason.

Keneagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why do buses coming down dog kennel hill in the

> bus lane towards the station and under the bridge

> pull out of the bus lane into the outside lane for

> general traffic if the bus lane traffic lights are

> Red thus reducing even more the flow for general

> traffic under the bridge?


Because they can and it's quicker for them. Not sure what else you're looking for here tbh.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SpringTime Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On a bike you can easily clock 40 mph with or

> > without a green light at the bottom of the

> hill,

> > and that's without even pedalling - depending

> on

> > your bike of course. Buses can do what they

> want

> > and cars are continually subject to queuing for

> no

> > reason with engines running. All types of

> vehicles

> > then brake like crazy (even some bikes) when

> the

> > lights go red after the bridge. It's a stupid

> > f!!ckin' system for everyone.

>

> Sorry to be pedantic "cars are subject to queuing

> for no reason" erm... surely a red light is a red

> light and is a reason even if it's perhaps not a

> justified reason.



That's ok - you're right, not being a pedant :-) Of course they should wait for the red light, it's just that the red light doesn't need to be red.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There's always a large flock(?) over the area of back gardens surrounded by Colyton / Dovedale / Marmora / Scutari, but no idea if / where there are any nesting boxes. We'd love to have one, and often have swifts zooming close by, checking out possible sites.
    • I would have thought the cost of erecting X meters of metal barriers would be the same irrespective of location, plus given the issues with access now due to the "bunds", it would also be easier given the ample direct access the common provides? The reason I've heard from the organisers is that their footprint has been tailor made for that part of the park, so it's not possible to fit it anywhere else. Which is a ridiculous argument given that  they've already altered / extended it due to the space they've 'lost' from the "bunds". The reason I've heard from FOPR and others is that as the common is public land (or similar) it requires permission from the Home Secretary (or similar) due to ancient grazing rights or something. Oddly it doesn't seem to have affected the circus, the steam fair, the dog show etc etc etc Yes, the wide path where Parkrun starts & finishes will become a controlled crossing during the build, and completely closed off during the festival. Also, when I asked about the reason for the extended footprint onto the sports pitch, they said it was to replace lost space where the bunds are, which they used to store equipment. However, they were unable to explain where this storage area now was on the new plan... And when asked about the loss of the sports pitch due to the extension & access road, they said the council had assured them there were no matches booked for that period. But what about the kids, families, who play on them? No answer...
    • I think one of the organiser's marketing lines for the event describes the festival as 'nestled' in the park- clearly having the trees and park as a backdrop is viewed as a major selling point.
    • It may be good to check the meter is not malfunctioning; this can happen. Equally there may be a slow leak. If TW were sure metering would reduce your bills- I think there is some kind of comparison transition period, where they get a sense of how much water you actually use- then I'd think it is worth checking.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...