Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No I would show them a different way ,of how they could be better than Vicky Pollard type girls,and rise to

a more intellectual level.

The programme is a good measure for young girls, who with a bit of nous would think,Good God I.d hate to be like them.

Maybe if you had gone to a Appleby fair,you would be enlightened.

@Tarot, whilst I totally recognise why you suggest other options, this whole work will set you free is not always for everyone. I have this graeco Roman perception about the ephimeral innocence of youth and the possibilities that this time present. There's a reason why advertising and the media in general seem to be youth obsessed. I guess I'm slightly hesitant because of your eagerness to find nothing valuable in something that they find valuable. Young and old people make mistakes, some of these girls may end up in unsatisfactory relationships and just maybe some of them will feel like they are living fulfilled and meaningful lives.

Was your early reading Mills and Boon.you have a very romantic view about young people,its not the real world though is it.

When those gypsy girls get married, they will probably be threatened not to flaunt themselves in front of men and never

dress that way again.

The end of the fairytale for them.

Your view of this little shangrila impedes progress.

Your idea is they are happy with their lot and no one should interfere.

Sounds like pond life and you are the sympathetic superior.

They allowed cameras to film them, therfore putting their lifes up for comparisans.

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No I would show them a different way ,of how they

> could be better than Vicky Pollard type girls,and

> rise to

> a more intellectual level.

> The programme is a good measure for young girls,

> who with a bit of nous would think,Good God I.d

> hate to be like them.

> Maybe if you had gone to a Appleby fair,you would

> be enlightened.


Yer, you still watched it though, yeah?


2/10 this time I'm afraid. See me after class. Etc.

I'm no expert but I believe the term gypsy refers to a distinct racial group found throughout Europe who have their roots in India but travelled to Europe many centuries ago. Traveller refers to any group of any racial origin with no fixed abode who travel around the country - e.g. scots and irish tinkers and laterly the so called "new age travellers" (where have they gone??)
Actualy it was not only at weddings that the young girls wore such skimpy clothing ( 4 yrs upwords ) the teenage girls wore shorts and bra tops whilst parading around the streets. Call me old fashioned, but it does not make sense and its rather a large controdiction from implemanting strict rules to the girls but then allowing them to exibit the half naked bodies.

The Romanies I have met while painting at a fairground on a carousel often talked to me about"their roots" they

were told by word of mouth by their families, that they had been here from before the middle ages.

There roots were Rome,having gone their as early Christians as slaves.

They managed to escape to Europe,And coloured their skins with wild berries to disquise themselves as a nomadic tribe,

they called themselves Gypsies,and reaching Britain they travelled with the actors and fairs and sold things and

told fortunes.

I found this very informative for my studies.

The young boy in BGW knew who he was, a traveller. They used to be called Pikeies, before P.C.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

I read his thread with interest and so felt I should add my comment / observation. I actually live opppostie a gypsy site (they prefer to be called gypsies rather than travellers) and quite recently there was a 'big fat gypsy' wedding which went on for 2 and a half days. The dresses were pretty much as they are in the documentary and the bride is 16 yrs old.


so far that much of the documentary seems to be true however, having lived oppostie the site for many years, i don't think the women are disrespected by the men, as portrayed in the prog. form where I sit, and i think i have a pretty good view point, from my living room window, it seems to be a matriarchal culture. The women seem to give as good as they get.


As a documentary maker, I know that showing them as people who just happen to live in caravans is pretty dull, it just wouldn't make a programme. I do however think there is a socio-anthropological prog there to be made.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...