Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If, like me, the constant plane noise in East Dulwich affects you negatively, please respond to the consultation about the 3rd runway and airspace policy - links below. Deadline is 25 May.


In the 15 years I have lived in East Dulwich, the plane noise has gone from minimal to loud and constant, as planes fly lower and in tighter flight path routes. This means that East Dulwich is constantly flown over - when the winds are westerly, we get the Heathrow planes and, when the wind is easterly, we get the City Airport planes (which are set to increase following Sadiq Khan giving permission to City airport to expand significantly).


If the flight noise doesn't bother you, please don't respond to this thread - just be grateful they don't affect your health/ wellbeing 😀


For more information about which flights are overflying us, see www.flightradar24.com


For more information about the consultation, see Hacan's website: www.hacan.org.uk


Consultation document can be found at either of the links below:


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/589082/consultation-on-draft-airports-nps.pdf


www.gov.uk/dft/heathrow-airport-expansion


Responses can be made via the weblink below or to the email address below:


www.gov.uk/dft/heathrow-airport-expansion


Email: [email protected]


Thanks in advance

Thanks for this - deadline is 25th May.


Whilst I think most people would have enough information to respond, bear in mind that the DfT can't provide all the info. From the website:


"We are currently unable to publish this information due to restrictions in place during the pre-election period"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it is less easy/ more expensive to fence off the Common, as opposed to the nicer parts, which is why our nicer parts are hawked off to Gala. Why should we have access to nicer parts of our park in summer when we might most like to have access if it can be monetised. It's ironic really that this council is so Trumpy. 
    • Niko is my go to plumber - he's always friendly, reliable and very good at thinking outside the box for finding solutions. He did have his phone stolen recently and was on a brick phone, so if you tried Whatsapping him, he won't have received it yet but he should have a new smart phone by now. He always gets back to you promptly and is full of good advice and always up for a chat 🙂 Niko - 07818 607583 -  highly recommended!
    • Another recommendation for Niko. He arrived in 10 minutes of me calling him and successfully fixed my annoying dripping tap! He did mention a problem with his phone, think it was stolen, but he is now available on 07818 607583 
    • Well, what a huge surprise! So, while the council digs up local footpaths to plant trees and 'green' the roads, it simultaneously offers up our parkland to private hire for a further extended period of annual damage.  It is hard to see from the map, but it looks as though the footpath that was formerly available to walk along the length of the event site of old will now also be partially used up by the new footprint, it looks like it will be partly roped off? I love how the final council report advise that 'while locals will be unable to use this nicer part of the park for a month ( and actually much of summer as it all gets churned up and has to be reseeded) that this is fine as they can just use the Common instead.    It feels wrong that the nicer part of the park is given over for festival use. I do not buy that, as has been stated, the Common is just not big enough for the Gala event.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...