Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello


I currently have a very good nanny who is employed on the basis of a nanny share with another family. She looks after 2 children, both 15 months. She has recently sought to increase her salary. She currently gets ?10.50 p/h net. I do not want to increase the rate if I can help it, but I also do not want to have a row with our nanny. If you do a nanny share could you tell me what you pay your nanny and what level of salary you think is reasonable.


Many thanks


L

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15200-nanny-share-salary-query/
Share on other sites

ljs you've already said in a previous post that you worked as a nanny for two stockbrokers. I don't think your experience will always be in line with all families who use nannies. You could be in danger of making families feel guilty if they can't match your experience. I think the OP would prefer replies from families who hire nannies in this thread, not nannies themselves.

Hopefully others who actually have nanny share arrangements will chime in, but that does seem a bit low based on the research I did on nanny shares a couple of years ago. From my understanding at the time, a sole charge nanny would be expecting ?8-10 net and a nanny share would be up to 50% more. Things may have changed now, though, as the economic situation wasn't quite as bad when I was looking into it!


Although it seems odd to accept a post and then expect a big increase. I would think it would be reasonable to build in a small annual increase, but if you negotiated a contract based on ?10.50/hour net and nothing has changed in terms of responsibilities then I can see why you wouldn't want to pay much more.

Nannies in east Dulwich currently earn between ?8-10 per hour before tax (?9 average) for sole charge and ?2 more per hour (ie ?5.50 per hour per family average). That's what we pay our nanny and we have some full charge days and some shared days. Simplychildcare.com are really good for these sort of questions - you can phone them and get free advice on current rates. We increased our nannies salary from ?9 ph to ?9.50 after she had been with us for a year (and been brilliant) and from ?5.50 ph on shared days to ?6 ph. Hope this helps.
Billy - when I was in a nanny share (we each had one child) we paid the nanny ?11 net per hour (which worked out to about ?14 when tax and NI added) How long has she been with you? I think she hasn't been with you that long it's a bit off to be asking for a pay increase....also I, probably along with many others haven't had a pay rise for about three years!
ljs it wasn't an attack on you. I just really think it's a question that needs to be answered by other parents, given the many issues and feelings that parents already have to deal with when it comes to childcare- it's a question that I think requires understanding from the viewpoint of the parents. And I do think that by saying a yearly payrise was a given for you it might unfairly worry parents who cannot afford to do this. Many people don't get yearly pay rises.
i think the thing to be careful about are costs.whilst i and many others have had pay cuts in thepast few years, things like my ticket to work has gone up by over 10%, vat and petrol etc also gone up-and I think you need to keep up with these costs if you can.

we have just given our much-loved share nanny a small raise above the ?10 net ph she was making. It works out to about 5%, which is more than the measly pay rise I waited 2.5 years to get.


Our nanny claims nanny shares are going for ?14 ph in ED but I have never heard a figure that high. Maybe ?12 ph at the upper end.

Hi billy, our nanny also wanted a pay rise, unfortunatley we weren't in a position to give her one at her annual review- so decided on giving her a bonus instead. We paid this as cash to her, so i think it probably ended up being more to her than any payrise we could have given. She seemed very happy with that and the promise we would review her salary once we were in a better position.

Hope that helps?

From friends' experiences, this is a bit too much. Does she also expect lunch and coffees out to be paid for, classes that she takes the children to to be paid for etc? It all adds up and when they start expecting their entire day's expenses to be covered, I start to think they are taking the mickey.


(My particular bugbear is classes when you are already paying THEM to entertain the children!)

new mother, I think it's only fair to cover the cost of playgroups if the parents want them to attend. I do get peeved by our nanny running through a ?20 weekly kitty though, for only three days and when they only ever go to low-cost activities, like 1-pound playgroups. It's a sort of pay rise by stealth.

I think it's only fair that classes are paid for. Different opinions but I'm not paying our nanny to "entertain" them but to provide a loving caring environment. It's good for the little ones to do classes, etc and I always think Happy Nanny = Happy Baby (much like Happy Mummy = Happy Baby).


Chantelle, ?20 kitty per week for 3 days sounds very high though. We have a ?10/week kitty for two toddlers (14m + 15m) 4 days a week and even that doesn't get spent every week.

our fault for agreeing to always keep the kitty topped up to ?20. So every week one family puts in ?20, theoretically taking out the change from the week before, but there never is any! We asked for receipts at one point but it didn't happen. Petrol comes out of it but a few miles travel can't be that much!!

good childcare is gold though...

Chantelle, unbelievable. Did you agree at the start that she could have 20 pounds regardless of what she spent? If not, she is a straightforward thief and technically if the other family doesn't know, you are an accomplice. Technically as it would never come to court, of course. For me trust is paramount and if you can't trust them with money, what next? Your purse? Clothes? Jewellery? I am afraid it does happen.

Hi,


There is a really good website that may be of use to you called simplychildcare. It has guidelines on Nanny salary. It recommends that average Nanny salary is ?8-?10 per hour and for a Nanny share based on two families sharing one nanny ?11 per hour with both families paying ?5.50 per hour each. I hope this helps. The simplychildcare website is definitely worth looking at.

I run simplychildcare.com and have recently updated the information on the site about average salaries. The average rate for a nanny doing a nannyshare in Dulwich is ?11 net per hour with ?12 at the upper end. And a nanny just working for one family is in the ?9 to ?10 net per hour rate with ?9 being the minimum (you would not get a proper nanny for ?8 net per hour now) and ?9.50 being pretty average.

Most parents expect to have receipts for any petty cash expenditure of ?5 or over and many parents expect receipts for anything over ?2. Do not be weak willed. Insist on it. As for petrol money, normally a fixed weekly sum is agreed which should cover the cost of petrol during working hours but also is a gesture towards the wear and tear, insurance and convenience if a parent wants the nanny to use her own car during working hours. 40p a mile is common.

If a parent is going to increase their nanny's salary, then it is the ideal time to tighten up on any procedures that have become a bit sloppy or are maybe being ignored completely. It is less threatening being able to say that as well as sorting out the salary rise, it is a good opportunity to review how everything is running. And that you would like to tighten up on some of the general day to day procedures which have become a bit 'loose' (e.g. petty cash or laundry or tidying up of toys etc at the end of the day, or how much TV is watched, or sort of food cooked, or whatever it is that is becoming a niggle!). And parents should make sure that they let their nanny talk if she wants to about anything that is becoming a niggle for her - perhaps she is finding that the parents are doing - or not doing - something which they never did earlier and which is now in danger of becoming an issue between them if it isn't nipped in the bud (e.g. regularly coming home late or assumptions made about availability for babysitting or undermining the strategies agreed for sleep or eating problems or being paid late etc.)

If you consider that a nanny can make ?9-10phr with one family why would the nanny work for ?10.50phr for 2 families? I think payrise if you can, even as little as ?5 a week will be appreciated, maybe offensive to some???? Bonuses are a great way of showing your happy with your nanny!

LBO, because a 5% to 16% increase is quite a bit? all just for a bit of extra admin. And I imagine it makes it more fun to vary the routine of the week a bit.


In general, though, the pathetically servile attitude that people have towards their nannies astonishes me. Most people act like they are grateful to have their nanny, which is quite ridiculous when you consider these girls have few qualifications in many cases and have an extremely good package that they could never achieve in eg a nursery or in the sort of alternative job that they had as an option. Parents, rebel! Treat good nannies well and with respect, as you would any good employee, but not as part of the family. Get decent service from all staff, just as you give your employer and for god's sake, have some backbone and self-respect...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...