Jump to content

Recommended Posts

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode in,

> unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters, and

> came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> his stuff.


How many people are permitted to accompany a recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

Milan05 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> womanofdulwich Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode

> in,

> > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> and

> > came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> > his stuff.

>

> How many people are permitted to accompany a

> recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?


Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.


"We invite as many Award recipients as possible to attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As space in the State Apartments is limited you are only able to bring one personal guest, who must be over the age of 16."


http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitation

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Borky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think I will depart now.

> >

> > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> responses

> > are these days.

>

> "These days"? You've only been on here since last September!



Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...

Thanks John.



ohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Milan05 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----Thanks John.

> > > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he

> strode

> > in,

> > > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> > and

> > > came to talk to guests. He was impressive.

> Knew

> > > his stuff.

> >

> > How many people are permitted to accompany a

> > recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

>

> Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.

>

> "We invite as many Award recipients as possible to

> attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As

> space in the State Apartments is limited you are

> only able to bring one personal guest, who must be

> over the age of 16."

>

> http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitat

> ion

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


And one that rhymes with the current name, I'd guess.

I rather like his sense of humour and that he uses it to deal with what must be pretty tedious activities (not Sn, sorry, Borky: Prince Philip). He's spent his whole life getting on with what has to be done, apparently not worrying too much how sections of the media may spin it, and accepting the limitations his role has imposed on him, such as not being able to give his own children his surname, his family's exile from Greece and his mother's mental illness.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yes. Reminds me of a former poster, with a username that sounded very similar to this one. Although this latest one is more like a crude parody of the original.

I was lucky enough to attend Buckingham Palace presentation last may, and it was only one guest on the invitation. However, and I'm not sure if this was because it was the Diamond jubilee year, my husband was also allowed to attend, as he signed up to complete a Diamond Challenge.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yeahhhhh, borky's back!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A beer in the garden would have been nice, I'm sure! Mine was a meal inside. I don't remember much about it except that it was horrible.
    • Went to the Harvester a couple of times to have a beer in the garden, it was quite popular and had a 'certain' charm. 
    • I never went in The Grove when it was a pub, but I had a meal there once when it was a Harvester (I used to occasionally be a Mystery Shopper, and I was persuaded to go and have this meal because it was a bank holiday and they couldn't find anyone else to do it.) It was truly horrible. At least I got paid for eating it, albeit not very much, but I think I would have paid not to have to eat it. If it becomes an "affordable" restaurant again, I hope at least it has decent food. Why do "these youngsters" need "adult help" to be enterprising? They aren't six year olds! 
    • At the end of the day, whilst these youngsters have been enterprising presumably with adult help & I also assume no local youth group - the fact remains that it is a prime site fir redevelopment be it a supermarket - Aldi, Lidel whatever or social housing which, let’s be honest here lots  of people need.   Know Idea why has been derelict gor do long anyhow, but somewhere on this site I think there is a problem with who owns it. And let’s not forget the homeless man who slept there - Front on Lordship Lane who had his home destroyed by I assume vandals a couple of years ago.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...