Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> During the snow, a neighbour who I'd never spoken

> to, offered me use of his shovel, when he saw me

> struggling to clear the front of the house. I then

> did the 2 houses next door, both having older

> people living in them. Unfortunately, the woman

> one side took this as permission to start knocking

> on my door asking me to do things. You give an

> inch...





young maaan.....

@ CitizenEd, I agree with you. Some people think it is better to do shitty things to others before they do it to you. A sort of reversal of the universal moral code. One of my fav books is by an author called Todorov called 'Facing the extreme : moral life in the concentration camps'. He basically takes testimony from people and uncovers ordinary gestures of compassion and solidarity. This is in a context where there is zero value to human life. Some people will try to remain decent and others will not. Who's example would you follow? The Anne Frank case is another example protected by one person and betrayed by another. It shows that moral choices are personal but people like to abdicate their responsibility by joining in collective amnesia. These are sort of lies which enable us to do shitty things to others and then justify it through the rarefication of social processes.

Fabricio the Guido Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> PS: is it always necessary to quotes one's sources when posting on here? In theory, can I make up

> any old farrago of nonsense and pass it off as "commonsense" "opinion" "fact"? it does make for

> a very laborious conversation if I have to have a reference for every comment I make. Just saying.


Adding http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061107145607AAuN9u5 or http://www.roebuckclasses.com/people/thinkers/hobbes.htm or even http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Human+beings+are+physical+objects%2C+according+to+Hobbes is scarcely laborious.

Precious nano seconds which could have been spent on some other social media? Seems like a waste to me. Where pedants fear to tread fools rush in... Actually, is that a call for more careful references or denigrating the web as a resource?
Ok a leap of faith here. I'm going to look at the world through RosieH coloured glasses and say that most people are fundamentally decent, and I'll include paedophiles, murderers, muggers, drug dealers, people trafficers, pimps, racists, terrorists, muggers, bullys, rapists, homophobes, bankers, traffic wardens and Jordan in that list.

Fabricio the Guido Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ CitizenEd, I agree with you. Some people think

> it is better to do shitty things to others before

> they do it to you. A sort of reversal of the

> universal moral code. One of my fav books is by an

> author called Todorov called 'Facing the extreme :

> moral life in the concentration camps'. He

> basically takes testimony from people and uncovers

> ordinary gestures of compassion and solidarity.

> This is in a context where there is zero value to

> human life. Some people will try to remain decent

> and others will not. Who's example would you

> follow? The Anne Frank case is another example

> protected by one person and betrayed by another.

> It shows that moral choices are personal but

> people like to abdicate their responsibility by

> joining in collective amnesia. These are sort of

> lies which enable us to do shitty things to others

> and then justify it through the rarefication of

> social processes.



Thanks for that, i will read it , seeing as everyone i come across is a hypocrite .

The Stanford prison experiment, carried out in the sixties by Philip Zimbardo, demonstrates perfectly how cruel and sadistic apparently normal people can behave in certain circumstances.

In a nutshell, this was an experiment where ordinary volunteer students were divided into two groups, jailers and captives. Within two days the students who were the jailers were maltreating and even torturing the captives. The experiment had to be abandoned because the behaviour of the jailors had become so violent and dangerous.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Indeed ianr, I didn't have time to include all Royal Mail options, thanks for that extra bit, they have been spot on for me, I use them a lot and have never had any issues with delivery, touch wood!
    • People are switching to electric cars irrespective of fuel prices.  100s of millions that could be spent on hospitals and schools for example have been lost due to fuel duty freezes and a supposedly temporary reduction.  Fuel is relatively cheap at the moment.  With a stonking majority when is it time to rightly take on motorists? Farming, I simply referred to Paul Johnson of the IFS who knows more about the economy that you, I and Truss will ever know. Food?  Au contraire.  It's too cheap, too poor quality and our farmers are squeezed by the supermarkets and unnatural desire to keep it cheap.  A lot less takeaways and more home cooking with decent often home produced, food should benefit most in our society. Be honest you do t like Labour. 
    • In fact there was a promotional leaflet came through the letter box today, for sending by RM's parcel post by buying online.  There are also options mentioned for having the labels printed  at a Collect+ store or at a Parcel Locker.  More info at https://www.royalmail.com/.
    • Is it? Let's see  Farming is a tough gig with increasingly lower returns, if farms have to sell off land to pay inheritance tax it will reduce their ability to survive. Which in real terms could mean more farm land lost and more reliance on imported food which sees money flowing out, not in to the country.  But I guess as long as you get cheap food that doesn't concern you 😉  Lol "what about the cars"  again Mal... like a broken record....  Governments know that squeezing car drivers for more fuel duty will drive down income from taxes as people switch to electric, which would leave them with a black hole in income. Guess the fuel duty is a fine balancing act tiĺl enough electric cars have been sold to raise tax revenue from their use. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...