Jump to content

Recommended Posts

EE has just put my bill up by 3.1% quoting this as the rate of inflation. I've told them as a business their prices depend on competitive factors (which should bring prices down), profitability, USPs etc. It's probably down in my t&C that they can use the RPI on a certain month. Interesting that they have picked the highest rate of inflation for about two decades,


So RPI has long been ditched by government as a measure of inflation. Many were up in arms as pensions etc are based on the lower CPI, and there were no doubt accusations that the government were no longer using the true inflation rate!


I wont win any battle with EE and of course can add to the competitive pressures on them by moving contract.


Good to hear from those on the know, rather than "I am a sad person with no friends". I don;t need the forum to tell me this, I know already!

This is a double swindle if it includes the cost of a phone in your monthly charge too as they'd pay for the phone at the beginning of the contract so why should that part be subject to RPI - i moaned to them too. I have noticed this charge is now more prominent if you look at a quote nowadays rather than hidden in their T&Cs so others must have complained too.

RPI is 3.1% for Mar 2017


About halfway down this link https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices#timeseries


Sept 2.0

Oct 2.0

Nov 2.2

Dec 2.3

Jan 2.6

Feb 3.2

Mar 3.1


My rent component of my shared ownership goes up by RPI in Sept - so I can expect 2.0% increase very soon.


and heres RPI forever (or back to the war) https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/timeseries/czbh/mm23

I think it's standard practice amongst phone operators these days; Vodafone did it to me a few months back.


You should get the best deal by switching every year using a comparison site e.g. https://www.mobilephonechecker.co.uk/sim-only


I've been with each operator about four times each since 2000. Easy to find unlimited minutes, texts and at least 4GB of data for less than ?10 a month.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's standard practice amongst phone

> operators these days; Vodafone did it to me a few

> months back.

>

> You should get the best deal by switching every

> year using a comparison site e.g.

> https://www.mobilephonechecker.co.uk/sim-only

>

> I've been with each operator about four times each

> since 2000. Easy to find unlimited minutes, texts

> and at least 4GB of data for less than ?10 a

> month.


SIM only is reasonable but obviously you either keep your

old phone or buy from the manufacturer (?500 - ?700 for the

top phones).


Edit: and most of us seem to be on 2 year contracts - mine

ends April 30th.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A beer in the garden would have been nice, I'm sure! Mine was a meal inside. I don't remember much about it except that it was horrible.
    • Went to the Harvester a couple of times to have a beer in the garden, it was quite popular and had a 'certain' charm. 
    • I never went in The Grove when it was a pub, but I had a meal there once when it was a Harvester (I used to occasionally be a Mystery Shopper, and I was persuaded to go and have this meal because it was a bank holiday and they couldn't find anyone else to do it.) It was truly horrible. At least I got paid for eating it, albeit not very much, but I think I would have paid not to have to eat it. If it becomes an "affordable" restaurant again, I hope at least it has decent food. Why do "these youngsters" need "adult help" to be enterprising? They aren't six year olds! 
    • At the end of the day, whilst these youngsters have been enterprising presumably with adult help & I also assume no local youth group - the fact remains that it is a prime site fir redevelopment be it a supermarket - Aldi, Lidel whatever or social housing which, let’s be honest here lots  of people need.   Know Idea why has been derelict gor do long anyhow, but somewhere on this site I think there is a problem with who owns it. And let’s not forget the homeless man who slept there - Front on Lordship Lane who had his home destroyed by I assume vandals a couple of years ago.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...