Jump to content

Tulse Hill girl missing : Serena Beakhurst - missing since last Wednesday


Recommended Posts

I think it's ridiculous to assume that the police and the press are ignoring this because they're racist (as the article states). It is far more likely that there is more to this than meets the eye.


An estimated 150,000 kids under the age of 18 go missing every year, a very large proportion of these in London. Before committing large amounts of resource police will look closely at the history, the circumstances, the events leading up to the disappearance and the reports of key witnesses.


Whilst this isn't failsafe, it's the only sensible way of dealing with this problem.


A woman in a happy relationship who leaves keys, wallet, mobile phone and coat at home in sub zero temperatures will attract more concern than a girl who takes a packed bag, a mobile, is unhappy at home, tells her mates she's off with a boyfriend or any one of a myriad other situations.


Please be aware that there are sometimes very good reasons why the police and the social services do not identify the location of missing children to their parents before appropriate investigations have taken place.

Herne Hill Guest, you don't mention your role in this situation? It causes me some concern.


Are you aware that the Police also sometimes decide not to inform the media, or even request a coverage blackout if they feel such coverage may hamper the enquiry or even endanger the child?


I'm sure your intent is well meaning, but I'm worried you may have misinterpreted the situation, you may not be fully aware of the relevant issues, and by accident you may do something inappropriate or possibly dangerous.


The Voice tells us that both TJMP and the local police are aware of this situation along side the relevant social services.


The police are in regular contact with the forum about local issues.


These are professional and capable people, and we should be allowing them to do their job as appropriate.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's ridiculous to assume that the police

> and the press are ignoring this because they're

> racist (as the article states). It is far more

> likely that there is more to this than meets the

> eye.


I don't think it's that ridiculous. Papers will hype news items that will sell more papers; and white middle class dead or missing children will sell more than anyone else.


Do you think papers and TV actually cover these things in the hope of finding the kids?

I think you're demonstrating a series of assumptions of your own there paragon, and I don't think tossing around accusations is going to help anyone.


The police and the social service have the best interests of the child at their heart, working with limited budgets.


There are detailed and well thought-through strategies and approaches for dealing with situations of this sort.


Knowing nothing about the situation, we should be be very reticent to start acting independently in a way that could be very damaging.


If you'd like to help, I suggest you contact the relevant authorities and offer your services.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's ridiculous to assume that the police

> and the press are ignoring this because they're

> racist (as the article states). It is far more

> likely that there is more to this than meets the

> reasons why the police and the social

> have taken place.


Sorry youre being naive.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but you're being a conspiracy theorist.



Why is it a conspiracy theory.....


I'd never heard of this case and I read a paper most days and look at online news for 30 mins. Compare that to the missing girl Jo Yeates who was on every front page for days.


The papers liked her case because they were white middle class, they don't go for stories that don't fit that demographic.

hibbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I heard this case mentioned on the news on Capital

> radio this afternoon.


The point is the coverage is much less than than other cases that involve middle class white women; not that there is no mention of it at all.

Perhaps part of the reason for that, is that woment in their 20s, with jobs, and live-in boyfriends, don't tend to go missing very often, unless something sinister has happened. As Huguenot has already pointed out, a teenager in London going missing is not really that rare. I just think that all this talk of race and class is very unhelpful. I am not naive, but I think people are barking up the wrong tree here. Anyway, fingers crossed she turns up safe!

paragon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hibbs Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I heard this case mentioned on the news on

> Capital

> > radio this afternoon.

>

> The point is the coverage is much less than than

> other cases that involve middle class white women;

> not that there is no mention of it at all.


--------


Iyo...sorry you are not going to involve me in a discussion about race with this one, I'm with Huguenot on this

It is not about race at all, but it sometimes seems about class I just wondering if this happen to a working class women same scenario but is living in Brixton or Peckham nor matter what race she was would the coverage be the same.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...