Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL...yes but I do compensate by wearing very

> expensive perfume.....(my footy gals can vouch for

> that)....;-)



Are you spraying that very expensive perfume under your arm pits?:-S Oh well, whatever cranks your engine I guess...or in your case, whatever tickles your fanny!


Dickensman, sorry can't help you other than to say that a daily bath or shower helps enormously:)).


And Narnia, fly spray? That explains a great deal...in fact, it's all starting to make sense now...

Dickensman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for that LadyMeadow, trust me I bathe every

> day, but I decided to change my deodorant because

> the one I have been using is now starting to react

> and make me itch, so I thought it time to change

> the brand.


Hey Cheeky Monkey, you know I was teasing - right? Anyway, just thought I'd mention that you might have become sensitive or even allergic to the "chemicals" in "regular" deodorants. You could try using those sold in Health Shops (your nearest one would be Health Matters on Lordship Lane). They can cost an arm, a leg and a backbone though, but tend to do the job without any unwanted side effects (in conjunction with my yearly shower - of course;-)). Alternatively, there is a relatively chemical free one made by Maine (Sainsburys DKH sell it) which is very good (it is performing extremely well in 26 degree temperatures as I type). Sorry I was flippant earlier - I should have responded seriously.


LadyMeadow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it is less easy/ more expensive to fence off the Common, as opposed to the nicer parts, which is why our nicer parts are hawked off to Gala. Why should we have access to nicer parts of our park in summer when we might most like to have access if it can be monetised. It's ironic really that this council is so Trumpy. 
    • Niko is my go to plumber - he's always friendly, reliable and very good at thinking outside the box for finding solutions. He did have his phone stolen recently and was on a brick phone, so if you tried Whatsapping him, he won't have received it yet but he should have a new smart phone by now. He always gets back to you promptly and is full of good advice and always up for a chat 🙂 Niko - 07818 607583 -  highly recommended!
    • Another recommendation for Niko. He arrived in 10 minutes of me calling him and successfully fixed my annoying dripping tap! He did mention a problem with his phone, think it was stolen, but he is now available on 07818 607583 
    • Well, what a huge surprise! So, while the council digs up local footpaths to plant trees and 'green' the roads, it simultaneously offers up our parkland to private hire for a further extended period of annual damage.  It is hard to see from the map, but it looks as though the footpath that was formerly available to walk along the length of the event site of old will now also be partially used up by the new footprint, it looks like it will be partly roped off? I love how the final council report advise that 'while locals will be unable to use this nicer part of the park for a month ( and actually much of summer as it all gets churned up and has to be reseeded) that this is fine as they can just use the Common instead.    It feels wrong that the nicer part of the park is given over for festival use. I do not buy that, as has been stated, the Common is just not big enough for the Gala event.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...