Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Keef,

Mortified for the impression I obviously gave.

I have absolutely nothing to feel snobbish about. I have a lot to feel grateful for in so many ways.


Generally, one email I received suggested looking at The People's Supermarket concept.

you have to be bonkers not to want waitrose in east dulwich.


memo to james barber: asking the forum is NOT taking a representative sample. try asking outside this tiny little deeply argumentative enclave, some of whom clearly do not take their medication regeulary.

What Waitrose does really well is veg, meat, fish and cheese. Beats Sains and Co-op hands down. Would also be open in evenings which is convenient when all the local shops are closed.


Whilst the views of those on this forum (medicated or otherwise) may not be representative, the argument that a Waitrose would have a negative effect on local independent shops seems hard to dispute and this is the reason I voted "no".


I haven't seen many people claiming that it would not have such an impact. The Co-op and Iceland can not compete with the local independent shops whereas Waitrose could.


So the more interesting vote would be for those in favour of a Waitrose to vote for their reasons.


A. I believe it would not have an effect on local independent stores

B. I believe it would have an effect on local independent stores but I just don't care


Are you an A or a B? (or just puzzled)?

puzzled Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you have to be bonkers not to want waitrose in

> east dulwich.

>

> memo to james barber: asking the forum is NOT

> taking a representative sample. try asking outside

> this tiny little deeply argumentative enclave,

> some of whom clearly do not take their medication

> regeulary.



So if people dont agree with you, they're deeply argumentative, and mentally ill? Sorry, but haven't you just posted the most argumentative post on this thread?

No thanks James. You only need those places if you don't have choice or quality in the area. We already have both. Having one just for the sake of it merely renders us identical to fulham chiswick etc. Let's keep ourselves special

Well you might like to pop in to Val's store, and ask Nisha how it's going since Sainsbury's local arrived. Not sure she finds it that funny. The argument that these stores bring more shoppers in certainly hasn't worked for her, it hasn't worked for other parts of the country and it won't work for Lordship Lane.


James - have M&S or Waitrose actually asked the council for a site on the Lane? And if they have, have they offered to build other projects for the community at the same time? I know it can be tempting for cash strapped councils to allow a big supermarket in if they are also going to build a school/police station/leisure facilities?


Oh and "jokes" about mental illness are actually quite offensive. Better to have a grown up debate and list your reasons for disagreeing rather than chuck insults at those who hold a different view.

To an extent, I agree with Puzzled... this forum is not necessarily representative of the entire community, and a handful of people on here will probably say that they don't want an M&S or Waitrose, to win their indie brownie points.


I would be firmly in favour of it, if - for instance - there was only one other large-ish supermarket along LL. I don't think Supermarkets are the devil, and those of us who don't usually shop between 9-5 find them very convenient. But on the other hand, we do need to be respectful of existing established businesses, and people's livelihoods.


And surely nobody is offended by the word bonkers! Come on, let's not start petty arguments for the sake of it.

To an extent, I agree with Puzzled... this forum is not necessarily representative of the entire community, and a handful of people on here will probably say that they don't want an M&S or Waitrose, to win their indie brownie points.


I agree with that too, but I thought puzzled was pretty rude. And it wasn't the word bonkers that is out of order, it was the bit about people not taking their medicaiton, which is suggesting they're mentally ill (because they have a different point of view).

I think James needs to make more information available. On a previous post he said the reason for asking what people thought was purely based on the fact that a number of people had said they wanted either an M&S or Waitrose in a previous thread. ???

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it wasn't the word bonkers that is out of order, it was the bit about people not

> taking their medicaiton, which is suggesting they're mentally ill


OK... I just saw that bit...

As much as I would like a Waitrose I am afraid I am voting against... and certainly against M&S Food (instant, tasteless food full of salt). I would love a Carluccio's - would not detract from local supermarkets and offer Italian food to the Lane.

Agree with DagmarJ and Gussy. You can't buy knickers and socks on Lordship Lane, I would have loved a children's clothes section when my children were younger. Especially the school clothes. A men's selection of quality shirts and ties might do well also.


Food wise I agree with the majority here, would love a Waitrose but not to the detriment of small retailers. I'm gutted that Val's might close; an original friendly corner shop.

Could the person who originally posted the 'Val's may close' comment please step forward and say where they heard this? (If this is just the old rumour from the pre-Sainbury's days then probably best if it's hit on the head now.)
A friend of mine who lives on dunstans rd mentioned to me on 18 dec, so i'm fairly sure it's not related to the rumours when sains opened. However, I didn't get a chance to talk to her for long and find out her source, hence said I had heard rather than I knew. Legalbeagle - do you know any more?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...