Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fuck Fortnum and Mason, their food hall's rubbish.


Give me Selfridges food hall, next door to Waitrose, next door to M&S Simply Food, and then maybe, finally, the too-lazy-to-cook and too-posh-to-eat-beans people will let this thread die.

  • 2 weeks later...

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All up for replacing Foxtons with something

> useful.


totally agree with you, why does Foxtons need such a big footprint on the high street is beyond me. i shop at both Waitrose and M&S, but i'll have to say allowing them into ED is a bad idea, once they come theres no turning back, and you can kiss all the independents goodbye and say hello to a more "generic" high street.


NO!

whitepolarsnow Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> i shop at both Waitrose and M&S, but i'll have to

> say allowing them into ED is a bad idea, once they

> come theres no turning back, and you can kiss all

> the independents goodbye and say hello to a more

> "generic" high street.

>

> NO!


Why does a Waitrose or an M&S = goodbye to independents? In an ideal world one of them would replace the Co-op, which is itself a more "generic" store.

Why on earth, when we already have co-op and Franklin's farm shop, would anybody want a new shop which is best described as a mixture of the two?


Call me cynical (you wouldn't be the first), but I don't really get the concept of the People's Supermarket. People donate money to it AND volunteer their time, and still they struggle to make enough money to cover their overheads. Is this really sustainable?

  • 1 month later...

East Dulwich is beautiful as it manages to cater for a variety of people from different demographics.


that said I wasn't too impressed with the Foxtons bold approach even though it was a well designed office.


The danger is if you allow one of these larger chains to open another store then it won't stop there and they will all come. Whilst it will be good business for M&S or waitrose, how will it affect those small shopkeepers who live in the area and provide a service that makes East Dulwich so versatile?


East Dulwich will then start to loose it's intimacy.


The resurgence of the shop keeper in the area is a joy and they need our local support. Sainsburys has done well where it is and I appreciate for what it gives interms of produce and the friendly staff. What will M&S bring to EAst Dulwich is my question. Looking forward it may be a good move but until I find the benefit of what M&S will bring to East Dulwich I'm not sure. I do think they should pay a heavy premium for the site, which may deter others from being too finincially orientated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...