Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On the proviso that no screens go into the bedroom....


What are people's thoughts or anyone know what the research says?


We are having big screen time battles and it has been suggested we hand responsibility over to our son to manage his own time on the understanding that he must also get his homework done and turn the computer off at a certain time.


If so what is appropriate time to have it turned off by and what parental control apps have people used that restrict use to between certain hours....


Can children manage this or will it just result in addiction?


(At present we are very strict to 1-1.5hr day on games)


Any advice welcome :)

Conversely, I believe restriction leads to addition - and there have been several studies which show how depriving a child of something makes it more desirable. So I am not surprised you are having battles.


We may be very liberal, but our 12 year old uses both a laptop and her phone in her room and we are not concerned. She understands IT safety, mainly spends her time snap-chatting and face-timing friends or learning teen stuff from youtubers (as I did with Jackie magazine). She has also paid for her own Netflix account - because we would not pay for it. She signed up with her own money so that she could follow the same TV series that all her friends talk about. At this age, more than anything, they want to fit in.


I think you need to listen to your son and re-evaluate your fears. After all, at what age would you consider giving your child the responsibility/freedom to manage his own free-time? You have to start somewhere!

Not all 12 YO are alike so you have to apply sense, rather than expecting self-management - you'll each have different expectations so would clash if you don't discuss it.


We're quite flexible. We all need downtime, but when phones/ tablets become the only activity of choice then there's a misbalance. Same with TV. It's nice to 'Netflix', but when it becomes an addictive box set it becomes a problem.


I insist we go out everyday, even to the shops. Can be quite hard to get them detached from devices but it's always good. We were climbing trees last week after school and at the adventure playground in Peckham Rye.


Sometimes we're just too tired so we just do what we want.... I don't mind mine up in the rooms but not all the time.


I've taught the kids backgammon and chess, so we also play that and other board games.


Try new things.


We also do exercise at home - wii fit - things I've found online (if I get excited about something, they're more inclined to get involved), hoola hooping, making cakes.... all sorts they huff and puff about initially, but then enjoy. I also put kids films, like The Lion King or Scooby Doo on in the background, which we've watched millions of times - and it always brings them back out of the device-obsession ;-)


If screen time is stopping you talking and doing things together, then it's too much.

But when they do go on the devices, I leave them to it and let them chill. Catching up with their friends is important.


Exercise is of course good for children's resilience and mental health - as is trying new things. So don't let it become the only thing they do to relax.

It's a hard one isn't it? We've had similar battles with our 13 yr old DS since he was nearly 12 (past couple years). He is much better this year (y8) than last year.


He is much more screen obsessed than his younger sisters, who are much better at self-regulating. If we let him, he would be on the xbox for 3-4 hours, before coming off to watch something on you tube on the computer, before possibly watching something on the telly. We've talked about how addictive gaming is, the effect of gaming (and screen time) on brain development/ good sleep patterns, and about how we have tried to let him self regulate and as he does not, we have to step in. So we have a rule of no more than 2 hours a day, and vaguely unlimited at the weekend, and then spend much of our weekend trying to think of wizard wheezes to keep him off the screens. (He does play rugby/ cricket in corresponding seasons.)


Having a set time means we don't argue about the time. He is not very good at remembering the 2 hours, so I did buy a timer, and that has helped too - the timer reminds him, rather than me 'nagging'.


I take Flocker Spotter's point about giving them the responsibility to manage their time. But we tried that with DS and he'd spend 12 hours if he could. I am trying not to be controlling, but trying to 'scaffold' my 13 year old learning self-discipline/ time management, and we do try and talk about it with him in those terms. A friend with 3 boys says age 12-14 were the worst for the screen obsession, so I am slightly holding on to that, and murmuring "this too shall pass" to myself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...