Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wood was very weak last night.

Rudd was off her face and out of her depth

Farron needsto be chained to a radiator for several years with terry waites

Nuttall is clearly looking forward to the new Reich

Corbyn is obviously planning his retirement

The Scotch were full of Buckfast and spoiling for a fight at the carry oot afterwards

Greens: meh

George Osborne still trolling Theresa May tweeting (about a London poll)


"1st edition @EveningStandard has our shock @YouGov London poll with Corbyn now ahead of May as 'best PM'"


https://twitter.com/George_Osborne/status/870236254377562112/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fpolitics%2Flive%2F2017%2Fjun%2F01%2Fgeneral-election-2017-may-absence-leaders-debate-brexit-politics-live

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway one of my favorite comments of the BBC

> debate

>

> Paul Nuttall: I'm not paying the EU any divorce

> settlements - we've paid the EU enough as

> members.

> Leanne Wood: Would you treat your wife like that

> Paul.


Classic.


They should do a compilation of the best (worst) bits of the Campaign, just like they do best bits of the Olympics.

What music to set it to, though?

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would've thought 'no deal' was as bad as it

> gets, so I'd like to know what this 'bad deal' I

> keep hearing is likely to mean. In what way will

> it be worse than 'no deal', anyone know?...



About time someone addressed this meaningless Tory soundbite...


Jeremy Corbyn says there is "no such thing as no deal" when Britain leaves the EU.


"Theresa May says no deal is better than a bad deal - let's be clear, no deal is in fact a bad deal. It's the worst of all deals," he said, adding that it would leave Britain having World Trade Organisation tariffs and restrictions, instead of the access to European markets that it needs.


"Theresa May's approach risks a jobs meltdown across Britain," he says.


By contrast, he said, Labour would negotiate a tariff-free deal that benefits both sides

Re- brexit. I like the potential Labour negotiating team of Starmer, Thorberry and Gardiner. Gardiner particularly has been impressive in recent weeks.


But, has Corbyn made a big balls up today insisting that he won't do deals, coalitions, agreements with any other parties? Does he really think he's going to win a majority with 7 days left.


There's just the merest glimmer of hope for a hung parliament and surely his comments are ill-advised in that case?


Someone please correct me if i'm missing something.


Edit: I've been corrected. he was talking about now, not post-election.

With Labour chasing down the Tories lead, he was right to say that, it's now all about perceived momentum (no pun intended), win your own votes first and worry about the others later. He could always do a u-turn in the 'national interest', it's not like he could be called out by the Tories for doing so...

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re- brexit. I like the potential Labour

> negotiating team of Starmer, Thorberry and

> Gardiner. Gardiner particularly has been

> impressive in recent weeks.

>

> But, has Corbyn made a big balls up today

> insisting that he won't do deals, coalitions,

> agreements with any other parties? Does he really

> think he's going to win a majority with 7 days

> left.

>

> There's just the merest glimmer of hope for a hung

> parliament and surely his comments are ill-advised

> in that case?

>

> Someone please correct me if i'm missing

> something.

>

> Edit: I've been corrected. he was talking about

> now, not post-election.


Thornberry today said he'd make a queens speech and let the

other parties decide whether to support it. Corbyn seemed

to agree,



http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/labour-would-try-govern-britain-13124551


Edit: What if Tories are largest and vote of no confidence is passed

though - not mentioned :)

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re- brexit. I like the potential Labour

> negotiating team of Starmer, Thorberry and

> Gardiner. Gardiner particularly has been

> impressive in recent weeks.

>


That's his top team really.


Starmer has been intelligent in his roll against Davis

Gardiner has been excellent sniping this campaign

Theresa May has been awful... just awful. Meaningless soundbites. Nauseating nationalist jargon. No acknowledgement of where/how things are going wrong in this country.


I must admit I'm starting to admire Corbyn. He's ran a good campaign, and at least he's put together a bold manifesto that actually offers some kind of vision. He's got a lot better in front of the camera, he's gained confidence and authority, and when he talks he offers substance.


But I can't agree with the mass nationalisation programme, and the manifesto "costings" seem like finger-in-the-air stuff. Still leaning towards the homophobic god botherer.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Theresa May has been awful... just awful.

> Meaningless soundbites. Nauseating nationalist

> jargon. No acknowledgement of where/how things are

> going wrong in this country.

>

> I must admit I'm starting to admire Corbyn. He's

> ran a good campaign, and at least he's put

> together a bold manifesto that actually offers

> some kind of vision. He's got a lot better in

> front of the camera, he's gained confidence and

> authority, and when he talks he offers substance.

>

> But I can't agree with the mass nationalisation

> programme, and the manifesto "costings" seem like

> finger-in-the-air stuff. Still leaning towards the

> homophobic god botherer.


But computer technology has changed (the illusion that services ran better because of privatisation - Moore's Law was the confounding variable). So many nationalised railways now run to very good time and service. This argument extends to other natural monopolies (including water and Broadband provision).

Emma Thornberry was very effective on Newsnight last night. She is certainly in command of her brief and has a good rapport with the audience. Not seen her before. With Starmer and Gardiner she would make a strong team.


However, the main point is that if there is no overall majority then there will be tectonic plate movements in politics. Neither May nor Corbyn will be involved in the new continents.

jaywalker... I'm a bit on the fence about railway renationalisation... I'm sure many public railways work very well indeed. Several private ones do too. I wouldn't necessarily advocate privatisation in the first place (as you say, natural monopoly), but I think there are other ways of addressing the problems.


Similar with utilities... I've no ideological problem with private ownership but there are serious issues with the way the industry has been set up and regulated.


And it all seems like it's going to be very, very expensive. Especially with utilities, I think John McDonnell was suggesting they'd buy the shares up...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
    • Their comms has been diabolical. The "son of a toolmaker" and "working people" soundbites may have placated an electorate before an election but they will come back to haunt you after it and will bite you hard if things don't go well.  If they don't improve things soon it is going to be a long parliament for them and there are no signs things are getting better. Amazing as they had 14 years to prepare for this but being in opposition is far, far easier than running a country.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...