Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Conservative manifesto leaves little wiggle room when it comes to Brexit - it makes it clear that the UK will leave the customs union as well as the single market.


Again setting an arbitrary and repeatedly missed target to bring down immigration to under a hundred thousand is just stupid, with the commitment to make it more difficult for International students to come and study in the UK being particularly self defeating. International students bring billions into the UK economy and are a great source of future UK 'soft power' in the world.


The insistence on expanding selective schooling, despite evidence that it does nothing to promote social mobility is just an example of poor, dogmatic policy making.


All in all, it's rather depressing. I cannot see how any of this is going to promote an outward looking, meritocratic, 'Global Britain'.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I struggle to see how Theresa May is particularly

> "left wing" even by Tory standards, but happy to

> be educated. In some ways she seems to have taken

> the party to the right with her brand of

> neo-nationalism.

>

> A real shame that the Lib Dems aren't making more

> of an inroad.. the main two parties have both

> abandoned the centre ground, and along with Brexit

> (hugely unpopular with half of the country), this

> should be their best chance since the party's

> inception. Poor leader.


Her interventionism I'd say. She isn't a free marketeer or a neo liberal. As someone once said she could be a Statist.


The nationalistic stuff is repulsive and designed to appeal to UKIP supporters IMHO.

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looks like the May control-freakery is finally

> getting the better of her. The Tory manifesto is -

> how to put this delicately - a little off kilter.

>

>

> I fear her isolationism from her own supporters

> will destroy her. She cannot listen to good ideas

> or abandon her id?e fixe in the face of

> overwhelming argument to the contrary - for

> example the immigration target to continue to

> include overseas students (what?!! - the great

> majority of the Cabinet tried to get her to

> abandon this stupidity). She seems unconsciously

> to have assumed the divine right of her heroine

> (Elizabeth I) - I very much doubt she would get a

> majority of Tory MPs voting for much of this

> nonsense if they were exercising their conscience.

>

>

> Perhaps intending Tory voters could explain which

> parts of the manifesto they find attractive and

> why?


Even if she wins she won't last long - the Tories will

use her for Brexit then get rid

Agree. Like most politicians, May is an opportunist. In the recent One Show her husband let it slip that she had wanted to be PM for a long time. She saw her chance and took it. For the Hard Brexiteers like Gove and Fox she is the acceptable face of Brexit. As the Spectator article said yesterday, they will put up with the policies they don't agree with as long as it delivers Brexit. They can then change the poliices laters...

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I struggle to see how Theresa May is particularly

> "left wing" even by Tory standards, but happy to

> be educated. In some ways she seems to have taken

> the party to the right with her brand of

> neo-nationalism.


Agreed. Joke to say she's anywhere near left.



> A real shame that the Lib Dems aren't making more

> of an inroad.. the main two parties have both

> abandoned the centre ground, and along with Brexit

> (hugely unpopular with half of the country), this

> should be their best chance since the party's

> inception. Poor leader.


THIS


I really wanted the LD's to sweep me off of my feet. Hasn't happened at all.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agreed. Joke to say she's anywhere near left.


JohnL pointed out that she advocates greater intervention in businesses that her predecessors, which I accept is a step back from the recent neoliberal ethos. I guess it's one of the few facets of her leadership that I cautiously welcome. But I'm not sure it makes her categorically less right wing.


> I really wanted the LD's to sweep me off of my feet. Hasn't happened at all.


It's not so much that they're heading in the wrong direction, but they need a charismatic leader who can give the party some get-up-and-go, a stronger identity, get people talking about them, and convince us that they're a serious alternative.

You forgot the following additional revenue streams...


Collecting teeth from Tooth Fairy stockpiles and selling on market - ?6.3 bn


Lucky Heather - ?9.6 bn (or ?19.6 bn - Diane to confirm)


Attendance tax for admission to test matches (home supporters only) - ?4.1 bn


Free drinks (Mon-Weds) for Momentum members (-?86 m)


Compulsory flat charge for Unison non-members - ?5.1 bn


Sales of Peckham Spring Water - ?12 bn


Sorted.

For the first time today I saw a glimmer of light. The Tory manifesto was so bad even the Daily Mail had to think up an obviously less than adulatory headline (still an amazingly stupid one), and the media are beginning to report that the plans for paying for old age and dementia care feature a hugely regressive kind of wealth tax. Then there is the extraordinary 'no timetable' nonsense for the immigration limit, and the failure to cost even the paltry few policies that are in the document (which is pretty sickening given what they said about the Labour manifesto). Further, it looks like UKIP and the Libdems are heading for oblivion - the latter is particularly sad, but there it is. The polls between Tories and Labour will close sharply this weekend.


On the arbitrary nature of the care-tax (and the distortions it is likely to cause) this is a very good account:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39977559

If this election is about Brexit then there isn't much difference between the Conservative and Labour approach to it. It appears some people think the UK can remain in the Single Market and curb immigration. That's not possible. After that it's about different ways of arranging the furniture that's left in the sitting room.


Only the LibDems have offered a 2nd referendum on the Brexit deal. Whoever the 48% are should really be voting for them. But as stated here,they don't seem to be making any impact in the campaign so far. I hope that changes.

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The truth of that is 'in a two-party system' which

> is also therefore its error.



I don't entirely understand your comment but would also point out that the Lib Dems don't have a strong identity in Wales or Scotland either, which are not two party systems. Neither are euro elections.

Wasn't there a poll recently that said half of Remain voters don't want a 2nd referendum and just want whoever's in Gov to just get on with the Brexit process? You also have to remember that the referendum was a binary vote, a straightforward yes or no. A GE is much more complicated, there are many issues, plus there will always be a hardcore of people who will vote along traditional party lines regardless. It's too simplistic to expect the Lib Dems to automatically pick up Remain voters...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there a poll recently that said half of

> Remain voters don't want a 2nd referendum and just

> want whoever's in Gov to just get on with the

> Brexit process? You also have to remember that the

> referendum was a binary vote, a straightforward

> yes or no. A GE is much more complicated, there

> are many issues, plus there will always be a

> hardcore of people who will vote along traditional

> party lines regardless. It's too simplistic to

> expect the Lib Dems to automatically pick up

> Remain voters...



Yes


They call them Re-Leavers and (even though I'm hard

remain) I understand their feelings.


There's no way out of this mess so just get it over with

then it either works or it doesn't. At least once we know

we can make further decisions.


May is bracing us for 5 years of hard times it seems.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If this election is about Brexit then there isn't

> much difference between the Conservative and

> Labour approach to it. It appears some people

> think the UK can remain in the Single Market and

> curb immigration. That's not possible. After that

> it's about different ways of arranging the

> furniture that's left in the sitting room.

>

> Only the LibDems have offered a 2nd referendum on

> the Brexit deal. Whoever the 48% are should really

> be voting for them. But as stated here,they don't

> seem to be making any impact in the campaign so

> far. I hope that changes.


"Mr Davis said: "We're aiming to bring it down to sustainable levels as soon as is economically viable. And the aim is to do it in a way that doesn't cause labour shortages, that allows us to train people up to do the jobs.""


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39975187


Some level at Some time in the future and there's a get out clause anyway :) :) :)


I could do that.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> There's no way out of this mess so just get it

> over with

> then it either works or it doesn't. At least once

> we know

> we can make further decisions.

>

> May is bracing us for 5 years of hard times it

> seems.


Definitely. Whereas there was no mention of ''No deal is better than a bad deal'' in the A50 letter, up it popped in the Tory manifesto, and her speech at the launch was decidedly gloomy on the subject, which usually means in politician speak, it's going to be really gloomy times ahead...

I expect that most posting here feel passionately about leaving Europe, many like me will be in denial for the next two years, others are being more pragmatic, and some welcoming it. I don't think that we we are representive of the nation as a whole where there are no doubt many 'weak' remainers and leavers who just want to get on with it all, and a fair number may not even be bothered to vote in the GE.


Don't take this as a sign that it was a good decision to leave.

I don't expect the remain voters to vote for the Lib Dems. In this constituency I expect I'll vote for Labour. This isn't just any old GE. What happens will affect the country for years to come. In my opinion, in a bad way. I'm clutching at straws that the country won't commit suicide.
The need for charismatic leaders (at least in the Daily Mail age) really tells you all you need to know about parliamentary representative government on a first-past-the-post electoral system. An uneducated public who mirror a 'she's just like me' misrecognition. Not really much different from what secures Erdogan, Putin, or other reactionary types.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...