Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Borky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well its bollocks isn't it. we are a pitiful

> shithole of a country , seemingly entirely

> populated by miserable keyboard warriors with

> hypertension and erectile problems and utterly

> furious about everything. I am looking forward to

> the breakup of this construct of artifice so

> called UK and the resultant civil war that will

> likely lead to the easing of pressure on the NHS

> as a massive swathe of red faced over 50s are

> removed from the demographic.London will daclare

> itself a Britcity1, build a wall along the M25 and

> the rest of so called ingerland will resemble the

> cursed earth.

>

> good morning



Haha!

Some tiny encouraging signs this morning at work. Means nothing in the bigger picture but made me smile.


Our Director of Economic Research (worth noting that I work for a $280bn asset manager) is voting Labour as he can't stand the thought of a one party nation and a girl who is the under 30s Conservative representative for her constituency, is voting against the party and voting Labour (reasons: sick of not being listened to in the party, tuition fees, national security).

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jaywalker Wrote:

> ----------------------------

>

> Helen Hayes is a bloody good MP.

>

>

> Agreed.



Do not know much about her. Never heard of her until the Silvester Road issue.

Seems an approachable pleasant person.


I would vote for her on a Local basis but despite being a Labour supporter all my life

and a former paid up member of the Dulwich branch of the Labour Party, I cannot bring

myself to vote for Labour with Jeromy Corbyn at the helm.


Corbyn is a conceited , self opinionated arse who refuses to listen to the views of others.

I would think he must be a very difficult person to work with.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > jaywalker Wrote:

> > ----------------------------

> >

> > Helen Hayes is a bloody good MP.

> >

> >

> > Agreed.

>

>

> Do not know much about her. Never heard of her

> until the Silvester Road issue.

> Seems an approachable pleasant person.

>

> I would vote for her on a Local basis but despite

> being a Labour supporter all my life

> and a former paid up member of the Dulwich branch

> of the Labour Party, I cannot bring

> myself to vote for Labour with Jeromy Corbyn at

> the helm.

>

> Corbyn is a conceited , self opinionated arse who

> refuses to listen to the views of others.

> I would think he must be a very difficult person

> to work with.

>

> DulwichFox


I have similar views about Corbyn Foxy. However; my view is that there's no way Labour will get a majority and the best we can hope for is a hung parliament, which may well mean a coalition involving some very competent MPs that may be able to exert influence.

lets nuke ourselves and do the world a favour.


You utter coward Corbyn, give us a straight answer on this - would you nuke the country and ease our suffering ? its what the people want. They have spoken.


Nuclear winter means nuclear winter, A red white and blue self inflicted Armageddon. let us be clear on this.

Right let's get some outcome predictions in.


Being long in the tooth, seen all this before, I'm going for a Tory majority of somewhere between 40 and 60, despite all the usual bluster and talk of some massive Labour revival. Youngsters won't turn out in large enough numbers, the blue rinse brigade will turn out and revert to form, forgetting about the 'dementia tax' stuff.


Anyone who wants to find out what's really going on, take a look at any of the major betting sites.


Louisa.

Borky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Obviously you do not.



Obviously I do, people who place bets are prepared to put their money where their mouth is, it's not about a bunch of pollsters making predictions from tiny samples with great margins of error.


Louisa.

Each of you middle class lefties and keyboard warriors should put your money where your mouth is. I'm particularly talking about those of you who over the last few days have been whipping yourselves into something resembling teenage schoolboy arousal about the 'closing' of the gap in the polls.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Each of you middle class lefties and keyboard

> warriors should put your money where your mouth

> is. I'm particularly talking about those of you

> who over the last few days have been whipping

> yourselves into something resembling teenage

> schoolboy arousal about the 'closing' of the gap

> in the polls.



It's more getting rid of May I think - The NYT says what fits with many peoples view - that May is quite horrible.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/05/opinion/jeremy-corbyn-theresa-may-britain-election-brexit.html?mcubz=2

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladbrokes were offering 3/1 on Trump and 1/5 on

> Clinton the day of the US election, and 3/1 on

> Brexit with Remain odds-on, so they're not always

> the best indicators.


Indeed. Odds follow the money, not the chances of something happening. When punters piled money into a Clinton victory, the odds shortened. I remember the Tyson-Bruno fight in Vegas back in the pre-internet days. Bruno's odds in the UK were ridiculously short, while all the Bruno fans going to Vegas for the fight waited till they got there to put their money on him at ? justifiably ? much longer odds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...