Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where's the cost of Brexit in that list? Labour

> aren't reversing it so the ?60bn that's been

> quoted by Hammond needs to be accounted for

> somehow...


The Conservatives figures were much more thorough. Except of course they didn't have any.

this Tories government have caused us to crash out of Europe and with a mother term will no doubt oversee the break up of the UK. History will judge how 'strong and stable' they've been for the country. Our kids are going to be poorer and have fewer opportunities than we did.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The Conservatives figures were much more thorough.

> Except of course they didn't have any.


They don't need any. Remember, there's the magic bullet of ?350m a week for the NHS when we leave the EU...loadsamoney!*


*I'm being ironic. Very ironic

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> this Tories government have caused us to crash out

> of Europe and with a mother term will no doubt

> oversee the break up of the UK. History will judge

> how 'strong and stable' they've been for the

> country. Our kids are going to be poorer and have

> fewer opportunities than we did.


If you are going to go totally tribal and blame the Tories for Brexit, then you should give the facts a bit more thought.


Brexit was a majority decision taken via a national referendum. Blame the referendum on UKIP. One major factor in the result was the "grey vote" ie older people who remember the UK signing up to the Common Market. This morphed into the European Union with the promise of " ever closer union".


It was the prospect of that "ever closer union" concept (driven by France and Germany) that frightened these voters -quite understandable, given the failure of monetary union.

Green Goose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Brexit was a majority decision taken via a

> national referendum. Blame the referendum on

> UKIP.


Yeah, I remember that UKIP government who decided to have a referendum on Europe...hang on, no I don't.

Struth. We are one of the three big players in Europe and can be seen to dampen down the power of the Germans. In my particular area we dressed up some good areas of EU policy as our own, almost as if we were embarassed to say good things about the Union.


"It was the prospect of that "ever closer union" concept (driven by France and Germany) that frightened these voters -quite understandable, given the failure of monetary union."


Maybe the view of some of the informed voters, and similarly that the EU was an evil institution that supported the mill owners and bankers that did not benefit the masses (I assume Corbyn's core beliefts).


But for many (if not the masses) - misinformation, immigration, loathing the metropolitan elite, lack of perceived benefits from gloablisation

One just hopes that the demographic concerned has read May's (not the Tories') manifesto. The rabid press was in full retreat today (apart from the Express that seemed to be covering some sort of social occasion presumably as a displacement). Even the Sunday Times (perhaps the most insidious of all the right wing papers as it makes an infantile claim to serious reporting) seemed riven. The first poll since the May stupidity has halved the projected lead (and reduced their expected majority by 100). And that was before that demographic got their Mail on Sunday this morning - quite a shock, I fear, and all credit to that paper.

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An

> uneducated public who mirror a 'she's just like

> me' misrecognition. Not really much different from

> what secures Erdogan, Putin, or other reactionary

> types.

Your judgment on British, Russia and Turkish politics is very poor.

That is just mooing. Do you have an argument or do you just want to moo?


For example, you might say: British voters are not captured by their imaginary mirror identifications with the 'strong and stable' leader at all. They are so well educated that they recognise this trap (to which we are, after all, all prey from time to time). They are not at all in need of containment strategies that limit their fear of economic and social flux. They are not at all insular or inclined to reactionary politics: just coolly rational and well-informed, aware of the centuries of European thought (and culture) that bring value to our lives. When they read the popular press they do so ironically. When they vote they do so with a grain of salt. Their command of detail of which party is standing for which policy is strong: and they do not vote for personalities, only for policies.

The battle is on for what pops up when you put 'dementia tax' into google :-). Think they are minting ad revenue from the two parties.


Nice one Red Devil. The Tories will ditch May as soon as they can I suspect: she is not up to it, not even close. The perils of announcing a manifesto the contents of which you have not consulted with even the most senior members of your cabinet. And another uncosted policy because the size of the new cap reinstatement climbdown is 'subject to consultation' - watch for headlines giving a figure after more pressure to come.


Perhaps she will abolish university tuition fees tomorrow?


Perhaps take students out of the immigration target the day after?


Certainly the reinstatement of free school meals by the weekend (how did she arrive at THAT one!?)

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> While we're at it, someone needs to tell her to

> quit with the jazz hands...

>

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/PortalPictu

> res/May-2017/mayspeech1-medium.jpg


Maybe she needs an Orb like Trump and his friends.


http://www.hail-hydra.com

Don't forget to add the Budget Self-employed NI U-turn. What's amazing with all this is how they went ahead with them in the first place. It's as if she doesn't understand her core support.

Theresa Maybe is also managing to do something unthinkable...making Corbybabes look statesmanlike and competent :)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Green Goose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > Brexit was a majority decision taken via a

> > national referendum. Blame the referendum on

> > UKIP.

>

> Yeah, I remember that UKIP government who decided

> to have a referendum on Europe...hang on, no I

> don't.


Well, both him and Villager voted for UKIP, so want I think he means is "blame me".

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> THERESA MAY:

> "Remain. No. Wait. Leave."

> "No election. No. Wait. Election."

> "Care costs. No. Wait. Costs cap."

> "Strong and stable. No. Wait."

>

> Credit -



Theresa May's 9 U-Turns https://www.ft.com/content/e021c208-3ede-11e7-9d56-25f963e998b2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But is it the Village councillors who are maintaining the board, or someone else? When the boards in East Dulwich were installed, it wasn't the councillors who kept the information up to date, it was Monica from Health Matters, who was greatly involved in various  community matters (eg the building of the community garden at what was then Dulwich Hospital). I can't remember if it was her who initiated the installation of the boards in the first place. She no longer lives in East Dulwich, and nobody else appears to be willing to liaise with the councillors and community related organisations  to take this on for the various East Dulwich boards.  It would hardly take much effort. Basic information doesn't frequently change (and no, I'm not volunteering. I am overstretched as it is). It's all very well to  get a physical  community notice board spruced up, but not much use if it then isn't being used for its intended purpose. And I can't see that it is part of a councillor's job to update notice boards which they didn't initiate in the first place. I'm sure they have more than enough to do.  The notice boards serve (or did do) a useful service, but all the information which could be put on them is surely available elsewhere. (Unless it is bringing to people's attention things which are of use/interest to them and they weren't aware they needed/would like, or didn't know how else to find the information). ETA: Oh. I've just read the beginning of this thread. I'd forgotten how it started. It's gone well off topic, hasn't it. Probably just as well, reading the OP.
    • The board in the Village (just near the pub) is in pristine condition, full of council-related information (though someone had stuck a flyer on the glass, now removed). Maybe the councillors there actually CBA to make use of a facility that took time, effort and taxpayers’ money to instal?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...