Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeromy Corbyn refuses to comment on Labour's policy on Trident..


..but on a much more important subject plans to introduce 4 more Bank Holidays

to unite the countries of the UK.


Let's all dust down our old Duffle Coats and Donkey Jackets and Unite to sing the Red Flag.


#Dinosaur


DulwichFox

The idea of more bank holidays is great for those who will get paid on these extra holidays but will it benefit those on zero hours contract and those paid low rates on an hourly basis? I'm not sure of the current legislation.


On another topic, if Marine Le Pen wins the second round of the French election, and everything seems possible these days, I do not want to remain in the EU.

In France the young are more likely to be anti-EU and the baby boomers more pro-EU, completely the opposite of the Brexit vote. A lot was said about the domino effect of Brexit, Trump and then Le Pen, but the French were always more likely to go against what the 'Anglo-Saxon world' had done...

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeromy Corbyn refuses to comment on Labour's

> policy on Trident..

>

> ..but on a much more important subject plans to

> introduce 4 more Bank Holidays

> to unite the countries of the UK.

>

> Let's all dust down our old Duffle Coats and

> Donkey Jackets and Unite to sing the Red Flag.

>

> #Dinosaur

>

> DulwichFox


But May is just itching to fire those Nukes as a first strike in an extreme situation (like someone criticises her leather trousers at G20) - Kaaapppoowww.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-nuclear-weapons-first-strike-michael-fallon-general-election-jeremy-corbyn-trident-a7698621.html

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree, it's another form of 'populism', just not

> the far right-wing/nationalistic type that was

> forecast.



In some ways agreed. But I think the differences between Trump/Brexit and Macron are more striking than the similarities. Both have an 'expect the unexpected' quality for sure - but Trump/Brexit is almost defined by being 'anti-expert', whereas Macron is the archetypal intellectual.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> France respect intellectuals in general.


Not sure how much this is true any more ? you hear quite a lot of sneaking regard for what the French see as Anglo-Saxon 'get up and go', in contrast to French stasis. And many French people think, rightly or wrongly, that the paternalistic and technocratic experts of the postwar French elite have got them into the mess they're in.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> France respect intellectuals in general. Here it's

> almost seen as a mark of shame now to know what

> you're talking about.


As Frederic Raphael (I think) once said, England is the only country where being called clever (as in "too clever by half") is an insult.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you hear

> quite a lot of sneaking regard for what the French

> see as Anglo-Saxon 'get up and go', in contrast to

> French stasis.


But so far Macron seems to have successfully combined the 'get up and go' with the intellectualism. A good combo, surely.



And many French people think,

> rightly or wrongly, that the paternalistic and

> technocratic experts of the postwar French elite

> have got them into the mess they're in.


I'm sure that's right. But I think Macron's combination of the pragmatic and the intellectual might put him into a new bracket which will distance him from these concerns. Of course lots of French people will be resistant to his ideas - but I suspect more will support him.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> As Frederic Raphael (I think) once said, England

> is the only country where being called clever (as

> in "too clever by half") is an insult.


I wonder where this prejudice comes from? I bet it's a relatively 'modern' thing - nineteenth century maybe? Does it go with the birth of schools for the elite that focused on creating 'empire builders' on the sports field rather than scientists ?

Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> >

> > As Frederic Raphael (I think) once said,

> England

> > is the only country where being called clever

> (as

> > in "too clever by half") is an insult.

>

> I wonder where this prejudice comes from? I bet

> it's a relatively 'modern' thing - nineteenth

> century maybe? Does it go with the birth of

> schools for the elite that focused on creating

> 'empire builders' on the sports field rather than

> scientists ?


I think it's a lot to do with the class system - in a society where high political and military position was more predicated on one's birth than one's abilities the clever person was seen as a pushy upstart trying to usurp the natural order.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's a lot to do with the class system -

> in a society where high political and military

> position was more predicated on one's birth than

> one's abilities the clever person was seen as a

> pushy upstart trying to usurp the natural order.


Clever is a bit of an insult though - I wouldn't take

it as a complement - it means you can do very well

with tactics but not with strategy.


Wise is the word for for long term knowledgeably

but you don't hear many people called that. Maybe

because most people acclaimed as brilliant (especially

intellectually in politics) fail eventually.


Maybe the British realise that or maybe English

just has too many words.


-

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenny1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > rendelharris Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > >

> > >

> > > As Frederic Raphael (I think) once said,

> > England

> > > is the only country where being called clever

> > (as

> > > in "too clever by half") is an insult.

> >

> > I wonder where this prejudice comes from? I bet

> > it's a relatively 'modern' thing - nineteenth

> > century maybe? Does it go with the birth of

> > schools for the elite that focused on creating

> > 'empire builders' on the sports field rather

> than

> > scientists ?

>

> I think it's a lot to do with the class system -

> in a society where high political and military

> position was more predicated on one's birth than

> one's abilities the clever person was seen as a

> pushy upstart trying to usurp the natural order.



The insult/anti-illectual thing was/is to do with the abstract intellectualism of philosophy I think - we've always been fine with the more pragmatic academic subjects

???? Wrote:

the insult/anti-illectual thing was/is to do with

> the abstract intellectualism of philosophy I think

> - we've always been fine with the more pragmatic

> academic subjects


I'd disagree with that actually ????. If you think back to the eighteenth, nineteenth and even early twentieth centuries most of the British innovators in the fields of engineering and medicine had to go to Germany, or sometimes France, to get an education. We were obsessed with the supremacy of 'The Classics' in higher education for a long time, to the detriment of science and technology. Scotland was ahead of England in that regard.


As to Wales and the Tories. Shocking.

See that Lib Dem membership is rising exponentially - there could be surprises yet.


Meanwhile, anti-intellectualism is a condensation of multiple factors (i.e. it over-determined): it rains a lot here (cold water on abstract ideas), we style ourselves as practical people of affairs, the industrial revolution made us self-certain about our practicality, we are protestant and have that ethic, we have an ambivalent relation to the French (whose language is more precise and whose tradition is more cerebral (thought) whilst yet also more visceral (cuisine)), we won against the Germans so their philosophy is rubbish, we took from the Scottish enlightenment a certain scepticism (Hume) without understanding its depth, the ruling class survived the late C18th, we established no great artistic traditions (in music between the great Purcell and the great Britten, in painting between cave dwellers and Bacon), the public school phenomenon, we stifled women's voices until very recently, we are in train to the special idiocies of American pragmatism, the Church of England, we still believe in monarchies, cricket. Perhaps above all, we established English as a universal language, so thought that it expressed the universal (oh dear oh dear; whereas the French were able to problematize their own categories of thought). A certain na?ve positivism and honest pragmatism amounting to no more than bad faith and cultivated stupidity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...