Snowman Competition

[untamedstylist]

#1: it was in private grounds were there were NO CHILDREN

#2: it was not shoved in any childrens faces...... so no children were corrupted....unless theres any kids on here which i highly doubt! seems to be all over 18's..... but even if there were there was clear warning!its someones own decision to clickon a link saying "sexual"its quite clear its not going to be clean!

[Huguenot]

You're trying to post rationalise mate, it's not pretty.

[Tarot]

Well untamed stylist,it was no longer private when you put it on the forum.

I know quite a number of kids that go on this forum,so,its a for sure they clicked on to it.

So where will your artistic pursuits extend to next. will you be styling your customers hair into a phallic

symbol.

[ImpetuousVrouw]

Any kids looking on here can find far more serious stuff on any other website especially you tube. Sex and sexual imagery are part of life and far less disturbing in my opinion than scenes of violence that have become normal on tv, video and cinema.

[Jeremy]

Prudish over-reactions all round.

untamedstylist - you're not going to convince them it's OK, so you may as well just leave it there.

[Brendan]

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its nothing to do with anal

I don't know, it looks a bit like it might have been.

[Huguenot]

This thread, the rampant rabbit before it, and the katie girl-kissing one before that...

They all remind me of slack jawed gibbons in Borneo drooling as they pointlessly and listlessly pulled at their sex organs.

Oooooh, loook. Vagina. *titters*. NOB *titters* bumsex *gurgles*

What a waste of space. Pathetic.

[*Bob*]

Here's

which isn't funny - no, not one little bit

[OliviaDee]

maybe a little bit

[Brendan]

Titters *titters*.

[Huguenot]

;-)