Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think that's funny I think that's offensive and puerile. It corrupts the innocent fun of children with the bizarre sexual hang ups of poorly adjusted adults.


It's the equivalent of stocking graphic pornography next to the Bash Street Kids.


You could only fail to see this if you were struggling to see beyond your own pretty reflection in the mirror.

Long ago we used to celebrate sculptures of genitals as fertility symbols, then the Victorians decided anything to do with bodily functions was taboo.


I'm not a fan of the Victorians and found the snow sex sculpture quite funny.


Not sure why you are so offended Hugo unless you are upset by the size of his snowy appendage or something :))

to be fair the post before the link was bit of a warning! "sexual" might give it away slightly!

if ur son or daughter searches simple non sexual words on google ur very often end up in porn links! if this was a site for KIDS imight have slight concern but seeing most if not all are adults im not particularly fussed!

some people are obviously too sensative! those people need to lock themselves up in a padded room and wrap them selves in cotton wool for the world is a horrible SEXUALLY infested place! lol

most advertising is sexual! get a grip! crikey! do people like this really exist or am i actually in some sort of wierd dream/ nightmare!


i refer to earlier posts! lol


hahahahahaha

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why sad?

Its sad, that people are now corrupting the poor old snowman.

Most people are very aware of sexuality,but we dont go around shoving it in peoples faces like pubesent school

boys.

Its nothing to do with anal retentive people or any other old Bullshite, people come out with,

Its just plain crass.

Corrupting young children is plain sick.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...