Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've noticed a stack of shed/roofing tiles on the pavement. These are on Melbourne Grove, just a few meters south of the intersection with East Dulwich Grove.


I've been thinking that they look like asbestos tiles. My suspicion was somewhat confirmed as Southwark appears to have put an Environmental Crime sticker on them and spray painted a yellow X. But other than that, they've now been sitting there for 3 weeks, and the council hasn't done anything else.

I suppose Asbestos isn't dangerous unless it's broken up etc.


Probably a specialist team required to remove though (maybe they use the city of london hazardous waste removal)


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/bins-and-recycling/general-household-waste/hazardous-waste

dino99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But other than that, they've now been sitting

> there for 3 weeks, and the council hasn't done

> anything else.


What evidence have you that the council's doing nothing?


First, it's hazardous waste, and the council won't have the skills or expertise to deal with it. Moreover, even if they could, there's probably something buried in the secret contract with Veolia saying that they can't. Veolia, of course, do have the skills and expertise, but their contract with the council probably won't cover handling hazardous waste. Therefore, to move this stuff, the council would have to get their lawyers to ask Veolia's lawyers if it's alright for them to prepare a tender document for the job, preparatory to launching a bidding process for such a tender. That's unlikely to be very quick.


Second, it's clearly marked as the scene of an environmental crime. As far as I know, it's a offence for even a council to knowingly tamper with any evidence that may be required for an investigation or prosecution, and so, before any of the strategic work involved in preparing for the removal of the tiles can be started, the police will have to be approached for their explicit consent. Which may take some time, depending on the priority given to the investigation and whether the police themselves need to make preparations for securing the evidence along the lines above. In either case, that's entirely outside the council's control.


Thirdly, although a temporary tactical containment strategy might seem an obvious first response, that's not necessarily the case. Any sort of cover or cabinet would need to be securely installed, to avoid it becoming a trip hazard in itself, and that would require an appropriate design brief to be drawn up, suppliers invited to bid, the proposals independently assessed, cost-benefit analyses run, consultations carried out, risk assessments drafted, planning permission gained and traffic management orders sought. None of that is quick, either.


Three weeks is a ridiculously short time for any of the above to be even started, let alone completed. It takes four years to make a zebra crossing, and that's just half a lick of paint, so let's have a less of this instant-gratification foot-stamping. I'm sure you have the best of motives but, after all, it's only a few asbestos tiles, and won't kill any of the children that play with them for whatever's left of their lifetimes.

The pile is gone today. I also photographed it and have been keeping my eye on it as well, as I walk along there regularly.


I saw some Veolia guys in a van nearby yesterday and asked them if they could get it removed and they confirmed that it was indeed asbestos and told me not to touch it, that it needed a special procedure.


So, I don't know if they subsequently reported it and the removal was therefore escalated or whether the paperwork, etc, was completed coincidentally... but thankfully it's gone now.


Nice to know that other people are keeping their eye out around here, too.

In the 1970s I used to play in a disused river wharf, you could go down some wood and poles into old underground petrol storage tanks, there used to be loads of that corrugated asbestos stuff, we used to make little camps out of it when we weren't jumping on the stuff.
My mum was a cook/dinner lady at a Southwark secondary school in the mid/late 1970s when she and her colleagues were confronted with people in spacesuit type outfits walking around the kitchen area! They were looking for asbestos but didn't care about the staff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This new party might do nothing more than serve Reform victory in the next election - there is no mood for a far-left party (as 2019 aptly demonstrated) and taking votes from Labour could be a nightmare for the whole country. But Corbyn has only cared about himself and his ideology - once a backbencher, always a backbencher.
    • The fragrant Nancy Birtwhistle advises this spray on site of urine/faeces to deter canines: 200ml water 50ml vinegar 30 drops peppermint extract or oil Put in spray bottle, use daily for a week.
    • Reading this sort of stuff - it's tiring. It's a weird focus on marginal English politics instead of the mainstream and instead of UK politics. How do you use 4 ex-Labour MPs getting elected an example of a supposed trend but ignore the election of 411 Labour MPs in the same election? How do you waffle on for several hundred words about the prospects of new left parties without mentioning what's been happening in this area for the last 20 years in Scotland and Wales?
    • This new movement seems great.  great ideas. But they’re just an opposition party they’re like a subsection of the Labour Party - so perfectly suited to Corbyn - his inspirational rhetoric can only be uttered in opposition.  Power would not suit him - that would require hard decisions that’s not his style, strength or skill
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...