Jump to content

Recommended Posts

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hope the local on-site 100-hour pharmacy service

> which would benefit the elderly and infirm will

> not get thrown out with the witch-pond water.


We have suggested that it would be more appropriate if the existing pharmacists could agree amongst themselves to have a rota system of late night opening - there are allegedly 5 in east Dulwich - they could each take a night and rotate at weekends. Why not put a pharmacy in SELDOC - more logical - plenty of staff around in the surgery and you also have the out of hours social workers on same site- it would provide better security than a quiet residential street. The PCT have ruled that there is not a need for another pharmacy in this locality - but those who are determined to add another pharmacy must provide the 100 hours needle exchange.



In reply to another readers 'rant' re representing the people it perports to. We represent council tenants,leaseholder, private and housing association tenants and owner occupiers from all cultural and ethnic backgrounds. Many of our members have english as a second language. On our committee, we have 3 people with disabilities, 3 Muslim. 1 Buddist, many of us are carers, some are working,some are on benefits (unemployment/sickness/retirement), we have tenants, leaseholders and owner occupiers. Many of our members have enduring mental health problems, long term sickness, or live in poor housing conditions.

We represent a good cross section of the local population - we might have a few NIMBYs on our patch as well.

Thank you Ganpt but I am not sure what it is you are actually saying other than - look at me standing tall and oh so reasonable on a fence. Of course everybody will say no to anything to do with drug treatments near them but you have hit the nail on the head with "5or6 of them". All this babble, a myriad of false pretences and for what 5or6 people struggling to straighten out their lives.

I have no problem finding an solution that ensures drug rehabilitation for those in need. Surely we all want that. The alternative is far worse.


But why in this debate must we automatically assume those suffering the ill effects of drug abuse are to have rights far and above those who are now a) paying for their rehab and other strains on the system and b) children with no voice of their own.


I think there is reasonable thought in the middle here. But those on the extreme of 'give drug abusers paramount rights' are as silly as those saying 'no drug rehab in my backyard'.

Maurice please stop with this Tax thing it is just daft. The councils has been diverting taxes to gentrify certain area s for yours while letting others slide, wake up and smell the Blue Mountain Coffee. What rights far and above are you talking about? We are talking about an individual walking into a pharmacy and then walking away again. Obviously if the street suddenly becomes full of hordes of zombie people dancing to Thriller late at night then the thing gets shut, thats it. I do understand where you are coming from and am presuming that you are of an older generation but you need to relax about it for a bit. Maybe speak to the buddihst in the BARA association.

Yep. The biggest to date has been Peckham. And Elephant is on the horizon to lead the UK.


In the case of ED, all investment (our tax money) has been paid back probably 10 fold by taxes paid by the new businesses and property values increasing. That's gentrification. A little investment by Gov't (tax) pays back huge.


Regeneration is when our tax money pays to improve areas destroyed by those living there. It doesn't really pay for itself. It's basically a subsidy. Peckham. My favourite is Bellendon, which falls in the middle. Subsidy to prop up a white middle class enclave and it still can't stand on its own. We're still subsidizing. A bit of an exception.

Elephant wasn't really helped by the architects and planners of the 60's and 70's was it now? Doesn't really engender pride in your surroundings living there. Any improvement that area can get will be a good thing. (lived there 15 years)
What does it say when the architect of the Heygate threw herself off one of the buildings? The elephant has been promised regeneration for over 40 years - I will be pleasantly surprised if they finally pull it off.

And Maurice ....you really are a bit divvy; forget my comment about your age, being senile is no excuse for your stupidity. As for ED taxes paying for their own regeneration you can make a paper aeroplane out of that pre-school theory. Everywhere in SL has risen, have you ever thought to put down you copy of the The Procreative Male and wondered why there is barely any tube service serving South London? And let me be very clear, it is absolutely nothing that you have done other than being in the right place at the right time that has contributed to the gentrification of ED


I understand if your motorised vehicle has difficulty navigating its way round Peckham, it must be hard dodging all the pit bulls, but try and get out a little more. As for "destroyed by those living there" they really should stop your access to the blended food service for that comment.


If you drop people in an run down area, fail to provide any decent schools, leave parks like the Rye in an absolute shite state for years, provide absolutely no decent facilities, only give people a decent library in the year 2000 then what do you think might happen, Adults/Kids grow up surrounded by signs that no one wants them, trust's them or believes in them. Obviously there are lots of exceptions but what we are talking about odds, a bit like the bookies really, you know how they seem to know which horse to make the favourite it's a bit like that, so...A bit like yourself.....its simple really!

All a bit naive. The Library is not in the best state now, and it's been only a few years. Your leftwing rant failed to dispel my logic - entertaining as it was. A little substance please.


Your whole point was tax dollars benefit me as much as anyone else because 'council's pour millions to gentrify communities'. That simply isn't true. Full Stop. Not true. Gov't money in Southwark alone has poured into Peckham and still is being used today to subsidise to keep things alive that on paper, the Council's own plan, should've weened off. As for ED, it continues to thrive because investment breeds more investment and on paper, and this can't be disputed, the invested tax money has spawned a huge return of more tax money.


Julie Burchill your comedic writing all you like, but facts is facts.

let ..me .......try .........to .........speak ........more....... slowly ........for .............you.


people live in dwellings, dwellings are set at pretty equal distances, a majority of these people living in these dwellings pay taxes, so the tax intake is spread roughly evenly. The fact that central government has focused plans for areas means that when those long term strategies fail those areas will of course need more money, and like your "investment breeds investment", failure breeds failure.


If I remember righly in 1996/7 there was a police vehicle regulary parked out side what is now the EDT, so ED is still pretty green in terms of thriving. Hence the arrival of Foxtons. No doubt the residents of Dulwich Village used to look upon you like you now seem to look on Peckham.


I am as left wing as you are intelligent and less intelligent than you are left wing.

"Oh, my God! That is so unfair! This is like, well sexual harassment! If you like, fancy me why don't you just say so? God, this is exactly like the time Hidehi, who everyone knows is a total lesbian, made Jane7 stay behind after PE, started telling her off for gobbing on Ganapatii's hair. But everyone knows she only made her stay late because she wanted to get off with her, cuz when she was telling her off her legs were wide open and Jane7 reckons she could see her spider. "


V.Pollard


Anyway were you for or against the needle doodle dandy ?

In one of my previous messages i stated that SLP did not use our Press Release- however, my colleagues have pointed out that they are asking for people's views about the proposals, so are likely to be running with the story in future additions of SLP.

For those of you who have e mailed us on [email protected] concerning petitions - there are several going around at the moment in shops, cafes and from groups meeting at the East Dulwich Community Centre. The closing date for these petitions is 2nd November. If you are running a petition please reply by PM and we will arrange to collect around 2/11/07 and deliver it to the PCT.

Thanks Ganapati, sorry admin. I pressumed all bets were off when Maurice told Chavlawdegree, to "get a law degree, Get a family and get a mortgage" as well as a whole host of other abusive comments about Peckham residents and people with addictions. Some comments like "white middle class enclave" in reference to Bellendon road also potentially lead down an unpleasant avenue. But Ganapati obviously chooses to ingnore these and would rather focus on my, as Maurice put it, " Julie Birchill" comedic Prose, in order to prove her point and keep her prefect badge nice and shiny.

Apologies all 'round if I offend, but I am a member of the community with valid views. Bellendon, in my opinion, is a white middle class enclave propped up by subsidy. Read their reports. It's all there in black and white. The plan to ween them off funding has failed.


On topic, as (properly) chided by the Admin, I believe there is a valid argument to consider taxpayers should have a say in how their money is spent. Therefore a proper consultation re: the Syringe Exchange should allow those living nearby a say.


As for the admin's input, I do believe mine have been factual arguments (with some admitted colourful language), while others chided do seem to get personal and have a lot of anger about opposing views. But I've a thick skin admin. I sleep well at night.

Maurice - so if tax payers should get a say in how their money is spent, I choose not to spend any of mine on


- subsidies for failing financial institutions


- BAE systems jobs


- The war on 'Terror'


- Faith schools


- tax concessions for private schools & private hospitals


- Tax concession on airline fuel


- subsidies for failed/failing PFI's eg Metronet (take them all back into public ownership)


- Fatcat payouts for directors of failed/failing PFI's


- ?360 per week, per room paid for with Housing benefit, instead of the ?60 they could get normally, for exploitative landlords who provide a crappy breakfast and call their proprty a hostel


- Contracts for friends of the politicians to build, supply, and maintain schools/hospitals/transport/sport facilities/the lottery etc


and i'll think of a few more later, in the meantime, I'm sure a few of you will have some ideas of your own!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...