Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting piece on radio quattro just now about emoticons.

It is 25 years ago today that the original emoticon was formulated, by a chap in a university somewhere in the states. He developed it for use on the university intranet notice board, where people had discussions that got quite heated and people took things the wrong way etc, (obvious parallels).

Then a chap from (I think) the Gaurdian came on to say how much he didn't like them as the written word had been doing fine and if you can't get the jist of your writings across then you are not writing well enough etc etc.



I don't use them myself but am fairly ambivalent about their usage. However I am not keen on the usage of them to 'make light' of an offensive comment.


Any one care to discuss or will this slip off the bottom of the page in a flash.(?)

>:D

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/
Share on other sites

the written word isn't something everyone is good at and I think people have cottoned on that a "dry" email or post can come across a bit stridently so emoticons can help them


Of course that means people who are offensive try an abuse that but we can tell the difference I think


I use them, but try not to - far better to choose words carefully

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40179
Share on other sites

I find them extremely useful - and on a board like this when they are rendered graphically :) so they are likely to be understood.


But the problem in email is I don't always know if they will be understood by the reader. So I would tend to use "!" or similar.


The written word may have got by without it, but that is carefully crafted and considered- not a quickly dashed off email.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40191
Share on other sites

Exactly right Andrew, emails and texts have made us all in a rush to say what we want to say, and emoticons make it easier to get your meaning across. It's just snobbery to suggest that someone who choses to use one is not able to express themselves through words.


I think they're fun particularly :-S , :)-D and >:D<


I got burnt once when I sent a "dry" email to a good female friend of mine who had just postponed a lunch date. I said something like "you could break a mans heart letting him down like that" and I could hear myself saying it in the way it was meant.


I later got a very long email from my friend "letting me down gently"... All rather embarrasing, and I have since been a big believer in ";-)"


I'm still good friends with said lady by the way, and we've since laughed about it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40193
Share on other sites

there you see, if I had got an email like that from a good, male friend I'm fairly sure I would not have taken it to mean that the friend was harbouring a deep, unrequited love for me without an emoticon to tell me that it was a joke.


I was going to put in my original post that this was not meant to be a one upmanship type of discussion 'oh people who use them are inferior to those who don't etc etc' so it wouldn't boil down to s snob, class war discussion.


happy 20th birthday the emoticon!


here's the Guardian article

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40198
Share on other sites

Emoticons. I despair.

I'm aware that 90% of the people love sprinkling them liberally around their postings, so I'll try not to go-off on one. But really. Come on. They're for dummies;-). They're no better than idiotic abbreviated text messages or putting a hundred exclamation marks after every sentence!!!!!!!


I know most people here use them lazily (and more often than not just because everybody else does) - so naturally you're all forgiven. But they're still for dummies.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40312
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They're no better than idiotic abbreviated text messages or putting a hundred

> exclamation marks after every sentence!!!!!!!


I can be rather guilty of the exclamation mark thing.


However, they are not as annoying as text language "alrt m8, c u in pb l8r" What? I never use text speak, because I find it hard enough to read, and by the time I've worked out what I want to write, I may as well just write the word.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40346
Share on other sites

I'd always thought they were on a par with dotting your i with a luv heart, and frankly despised them. I have come to see the error of my ways (particularly in light of Keef's friend's misunderstanding - lummy!!!)


but I still can't quite bring myself to go on a date with a man who uses them - am I missing out?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40389
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted lego my child is collecting lego if you have any for sale please let me know
    • I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...