Jump to content

Is the past sometimes best left in the past?

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jaywalker Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Haven't we all made mistakes?

> > > I don't mean murder, but as we get older and

> > > worldlier don't we all realise we treated

> > people

> > > badly/misinterpreted others actions?

> > > I would not make the mistakes again-but I am

> > > guilty - the list is long...

> >

> > The sentiment is admirable. But who have you

> > installed in the tribunal of your own reason to

> > find yourself guilty? Did you think that this

> > phantasm was of your own devising?

>

> You're single, right?


Why the snide attack on the person..?

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > jaywalker Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Haven't we all made mistakes?

> > > > I don't mean murder, but as we get older

> and

> > > > worldlier don't we all realise we treated

> > > people

> > > > badly/misinterpreted others actions?

> > > > I would not make the mistakes again-but I

> am

> > > > guilty - the list is long...

> > >

> > > The sentiment is admirable. But who have you

> > > installed in the tribunal of your own reason

> to

> > > find yourself guilty? Did you think that this

> > > phantasm was of your own devising?

> >

> > You're single, right?

>

> Why the snide attack on the person..?


I don't wish, and I'm sure s/he wouldn't wish me to, speak for Seabag, but I took it that s/he was making a rather amusing joke that if you've got a partner you've got someone to make you feel guilty, no need to devise your own guilt - pretty sure s/he wasn't making a personal attack.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I got the notion of it being a joke but it was a

> pointed barb ...lacked any humour for me....


Sorry, can't see it - just a joke about the nature of being in a couple as far as I was concerned.

Seabag

Seabag

Posted
Posted

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship 516 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I got the notion of it being a joke but it was

> a

> > pointed barb ...lacked any humour for me....

>

> Sorry, can't see it - just a joke about the nature

> of being in a couple as far as I was concerned.


Well done RH, maximum points to you.


0 points to Lordship.

Seabag

Seabag

Posted
Posted

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can see it (the joke I mean not the thing about

> it not being a joke) and thought it was funny -

> and believe "who have you installed in the

> tribunal of your own reason" is the basis for a

> perfect dinner party game slash R4 panel show.


Hosted by Nicholas Parsons ?

jaywalker

jaywalker

Posted
Posted

I thought Otta's OP was quite a serious one.


How does one approach it?


Presumably, we all bring to bear what resources we can.


No doubt I should try harder to make my points clearer. You have said before that the kind of language I used above is pretentious and vacuous (and this is certainly always a danger). But, for me, the OP raises a question that is both important and very difficult to get at. You can say my points make no sense, but I'm not sure that this is true (mainly because I have no new ideas and have to plunder them from elsewhere even if I do try to put them in my own words).


I use ordinary and direct language when I'm posting about car parking, pheasants or pavements: not sure that will get us very far with the OP.


But you are probably right, the tribunal of the EDF forum is a good place to come face to face with one's own pretentiousness: and at this time of year gardening suddenly looks more interesting.

jaywalker

jaywalker

Posted
Posted

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can see it (the joke I mean not the thing about

> it not being a joke) and thought it was funny -

> and believe "who have you installed in the

> tribunal of your own reason" is the basis for a

> perfect dinner party game slash R4 panel show.


glad you have such a great sense of humour maxxi.


why is the quotation the basis for a perfect dinner party game?


do we judge ourselves autonomously? my point was that we do not.


the phrase 'tribunal of reason' is, I admit, derivative: but I guess you just think its a joke.

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship 516 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > @Seabag

> >

> > ...always happy to receive 0 points from you.

>

>

> You say 'happy' but do I detect a little bit of

> 'prickly' Mr 516?

>

> Ok I'll give you a +1, is that better ?


...nope...when I say I'm happy, then I mean happy..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...