Jump to content

wikileaks

Dickensman

By Dickensman
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

I'll use whatever I wish in my posts, okay? >:D<


My use of 'obsequious' was about your evident admiration (of Wiki of all things) LOL < in hopes that also annoys you ;-)



We disagree about ASSange.


Let's leave it at that.


------------------------------------

The OP


wikileaks

Posted by: DICKENSMAN December 06, 06:04PM


They are trying to bring this man down for repeating the truth?


Is this witch-hunt justified?


-----------------


Clearly you didn't really want a convo about it.

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DFTT.



In other words you cannot debate Lou?


Fine when it's all yadder yadder "I agree you agree we agree etc and yes he's anti-authoritarian so he must be the greatest".


Except ...... listen to the radio link fgs and hear first hand (late: I just did so again, what a pseud he is).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00wqfng



Edit: middle line

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hill Dweller - do you realise you're coming over

> as a bit of a tit? Just thought I'd be neigbourly

> and let you know, incase you're unaware of it.



What makes you think we're neighbours?


Or .... let me guess ..... anyone disagreeing with the established majority opinion MUST be a 'troll' and an agreer can't be a wannabe gang member ...... or can they?

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted
Yes SM, all that 'I'm a new boy around here' guff on every thread did strike me as incredibly fake. It was all just screaming 'I've been around here before but I'm trying to pretend I haven't'. (And the Wolf lives on the Hill, non?) But the thing that's soooo difficult to get rid of is tone of voice.
Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

To Dickensman

Only the post boy? Don't the people using postmen/women (or boys, if you insist) usually stamp and post and describe their intended readers-to-be?

Don't we usually regard post as private? Would you like your postman/woman to read all of yours?

Your comparisons are silly and I doubt the ass would appreciate yours of him either.


To following pair LOL

I take all that guff as typical of forum paranoia that a newie is actually a returnee.

I have had one ID on this forum, I joined about 7 days ago in that/this ID (can't be faffed to check date but daresay you have).

Is the forum admin (or are they, if plural) in the habit of banning people? A huge nother LOL if so.

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

Dickensman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> continue.



Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being modest) will jump on those accusing others of making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other than that themselves.

On the other hand you/they could do some thinking about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

Back to IF you are, you could educate the wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs, know that they are shown on every post, therefore know that all my posts have come from the same IPA at all times of day and night. Further on this one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you could let them know how very flattering they are being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if s/he's looking in they are surely massaging his/her ego.



BIG LOL.

Act on the real point, stop behaving like a fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like threats.

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted

Hill Dweller Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dickensman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> > people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> > forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> > continue.

>

>

> Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being

> modest) will jump on those accusing others of

> making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other

> than that themselves.

> On the other hand you/they could do some thinking

> about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed

> with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

> Back to IF you are, you could educate the

> wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that

> organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs,

> know that they are shown on every post, therefore

> know that all my posts have come from the same IPA

> at all times of day and night. Further on this

> one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has

> ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you

> could let them know how very flattering they are

> being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how

> obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if

> s/he's looking in they are surely massaging

> his/her ego.

>

>

> BIG LOL.

> Act on the real point, stop behaving like a

> fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like

> threats.


I think I rest my case? B) :-S

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

Given your last five posts should I take it for granted you are among the forum's 'govt' Dick?



1. Re: wikileaks

Wot's a paff? Wot's an edl type threat? Wot do I care anyway.........ranting buffoon.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 08:54

Dickensman

2. Re: wikileaks

Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning people, usually for disturbing the peace of the forum, as you will no doubt discover if you continue.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 00:16

Dickensman

3. Re: wikileaks

Apart from the American government, to the most part Assange seems to be approved of, after all he is only the postboy for someone else's missives.

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:58

Dickensman

4. Re: petrol prices

Oh for a snipers rifle!

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:57

Dickensman

5. Re: Predictions for 2011

Take it with you to the McCann thread queeny! Or predict something for 2011.

Forum: The Lounge

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • NewWave
      Best Sunday/Easter Pub Lunch?

      By NewWave · Posted

      Agree with @Sue the Dog is awful-nice building awful food. We like The Rossendale and Watsons
    • Eats Dulwich
      Best Sunday/Easter Pub Lunch?

      By Eats Dulwich · Posted

      There are so many variables. Good chefs can having bad nights, post-Brexit staff shortages, your dish might be brilliant, your friend might order something that's inedible. In the end I think the best option is just to go to the restaurant which has the best overall reviews. If all the reviews are bad then avoid, but even if all the reviews are good that's not a cast iron gaurantee. 
    • Sue
      Best Sunday/Easter Pub Lunch?

      By Sue · Posted

      The trouble is that pub management and chefs are constantly changing, so what might be fantastic on one occasion  becomes terrible a short time later, and vice versa. Two of the worst pub lunches I've had locally were at the Dog in the village and the Plough, but both those were some time ago. We had an absolutely appalling Christmas lunch on Christmas Day at The Cherry Tree, which was also exorbitantly expensive, so unless their chef (I use the term loosely) has changed, I wouldn't advise eating there. The menu looked amazing. We thought we would treat ourselves. Never again 😭
    • Eats Dulwich
      Best Sunday/Easter Pub Lunch?

      By Eats Dulwich · Posted

      If you've seen the original longer post then you'll know that you've taken that out of context. I don't charge but didn't feel I even needed to say that – you've made it sound like I do charge and that's why I deleted this part of the post saying I don't charge. When I read back what I'd written it sounded like I was defending myself against criticisms that hadn't even been made so i cut it out. And now you've made that kind of criticism anyway I should've left it in.  What do you mean "not charging people to read your reviews of their local restaurants."?  You make it sound like i'm sneaking into SE22 from somewhere else. I live here - they are reviews of my local restaurants!

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...