Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Willard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was almost convinced until..... "And it borders

> the trendy areas of Penge"

>

> Joking aside, I also hear good things about

> Sydenham.


Trendy may be pushing it but it's getting less far fetched by the day. New bars opening including a brewery taproom, a thriving theatre and a vibrant street art scene.

We moved from ED a year and a half ago and don't regret it.

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would recommend Sydenham.

>

> Transport there is much better via access to three

> train lines (via Sydenham, Lower Sydenham and

> Sydenham Hill/Penge East). I am regularly at

> Canary Wharf in 30mins door to door. It will also

> further benefit from the Bakerloo Line extension

> passing via New Cross, with the possibility of

> directly linking to Lower Sydenham in the future.

>

> Sydenham also has improving schools and a number

> of lovely parks. While the choice of restaurants

> is not as great as ED, two of the restaurants have

> recently made the Top 10 in London on TripAdvisor.

>

>

> The Greyhound should re-open in the summer after

> its refurbishment, and rumour has it that a cinema

> will also open this year. The local gym is great,

> with excellent access to new equipment and

> classes.

>

> And its far cheaper, with larger houses. The

> Lawrie Park Triangle, Cator Road and The Thorpes

> are all examples of nice pockets to live.

>

> The locals are friendly as well. A good mix of

> young couples and families are regularly moving to

> the area.

>

> And it borders the trendy areas of Penge and

> Crystal Palace.

>

> Worth a look.

We agree! Moved a year and half ago and don't regret it!

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would recommend Sydenham.

>

> Transport there is much better via access to three

> train lines (via Sydenham, Lower Sydenham and

> Sydenham Hill/Penge East). I am regularly at

> Canary Wharf in 30mins door to door. It will also

> further benefit from the Bakerloo Line extension

> passing via New Cross, with the possibility of

> directly linking to Lower Sydenham in the future.

>

> Sydenham also has improving schools and a number

> of lovely parks. While the choice of restaurants

> is not as great as ED, two of the restaurants have

> recently made the Top 10 in London on TripAdvisor.

>

>

> The Greyhound should re-open in the summer after

> its refurbishment, and rumour has it that a cinema

> will also open this year. The local gym is great,

> with excellent access to new equipment and

> classes.

>

> And its far cheaper, with larger houses. The

> Lawrie Park Triangle, Cator Road and The Thorpes

> are all examples of nice pockets to live.

>

> The locals are friendly as well. A good mix of

> young couples and families are regularly moving to

> the area.

>

> And it borders the trendy areas of Penge and

> Crystal Palace.

>

> Worth a look.

The service from Penge East is pretty good compared to some lines. Not many cancellations, though there are often delays of a few minutes. The trains can get crowded though as more people have moved away from zones 1 and 2 but work centrally. Penge East is often the last station where you can still get a seat.

helew Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Aw Jeremy, sorry you don't understand satire



Not satire, yet another example of why London has been ruined by trendy outsiders wanting to move to neighbourhoods just to buy a property in a working class neighbourhood and feel 'edgy', whilst in reality their very being there is the start of spiralling house prices, displacement of the population born and raised in the area, and the homogenisation of traditional working class inner London.


This city is not a monopoly board, where you can play the pick and choose game make some money and move along, it's a real place with real people. I hate what's become of this place, I really do.


Transport links, who even spoke about stuff like this 20 years ago around here.


Louisa.



Nah, in the good old days the stolid workers of ED used to get up at 4am every day and walk barefoot to their work up town, even when the snow was 6 feet deep. Everyone was happy and didn't care about trains and buses - these were for softies.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> helew Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Aw Jeremy, sorry you don't understand satire

>

>

> Not satire, yet another example of why London has

> been ruined by trendy outsiders wanting to move to

> neighbourhoods just to buy a property in a working

> class neighbourhood and feel 'edgy', whilst in

> reality their very being there is the start of

> spiralling house prices, displacement of the

> population born and raised in the area, and the

> homogenisation of traditional working class inner

> London.

>

> This city is not a monopoly board, where you can

> play the pick and choose game make some money and

> move along, it's a real place with real people. I

> hate what's become of this place, I really do.

>

> Transport links, who even spoke about stuff like

> this 20 years ago around here.

>

> Louisa.




NOTHING SHOULD CHANGE. EVER.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's not what she said though titch. You've

> quoted her right there in your post.



Yes, I know, and I wasn't being entirely literal. Hence the use of jokey angry upper case.

I say this as a homeowner: the orgasmic reaction of many homeowners when they learn their home has gone up in value never ceases to amaze me. If the appreciation means you are in a lower LTV range and can get a cheaper mortgage, by all means, great for you, but most people fail to realise that their house being worth more is virtual wealth, which you can only cash in on if you move somewhere where house prices are cheaper. If you want to retire to Nowhereshire or some sunny Mediterranean town (interesting to see what will happen post Brexit!), fine, but for the majority of people who still need to live sort of in the area, crazy house prices simply mean that the chances of moving to a bigger property and/or to a better area have become even slimmer than they were before.


Oh, and all of this is looking at the situation from a purely selfish perspective, without taking into account the impact on the rest of society as a whole...

Absolutely Dulwich Londoner :-)

The migration of people to an area

I think is mainly driven by the desire to

Be near people who look, sound and dress like them

There's a mob/pack, mediocre mentality that's crept into

London... I don't think it's just about house prices

But rather greedy mundane people are attracted to each other.

The fear of difference seems to be making its way back into our society

  • 2 months later...

It seems the improvement to the service didn't last long after all:

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1682022,page=26


Overtime ban, new emergency timetable, reduced services, etc. Does it sound familiar?

Is it? My understanding of the websites of SouthernFail and ASLEF was that members of this union will stop working overtime **till further notice**. Nowhere does it say that the ban will last from day X to day Y.

Have I misunderstood?

It's not a strike, it's an overtime ban.

Yes, it is probably not going to last forever, but, if previous experience is anything to go by (have we all already forgotten that trains used to run every hour in the morning rush hour for most of last summer?), this has the potential to cause severe disruption for a long period!

DulwichLondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not a strike, it's an overtime ban.

> Yes, it is probably not going to last forever,

> but, if previous experience is anything to go by

> (have we all already forgotten that trains used to

> run every hour in the morning rush hour for most

> of last summer?), this has the potential to cause

> severe disruption for a long period!


Well industrial action then. But you're suggesting that ED is a poor place to live because of its transport connections. Our transport connections IMHO are fine. When they're disrupted, they're not. Same as anywhere else.

So it's all fine except when it's not! :)


A lot of areas served by Southern Fail have witnessed a level of disruption, since approximately Nov 2015 with issues at London bridge, which are AFAIK unheard of in the large cities of a developed nation. As a nation, we seem to love making fun of the French and their strikes, but I am not aware of anything even remotely comparable ever happening in Paris.


Sure, other areas have it worse; I met commuters from Brighton who were forced to spend many nights in hotels or crushing at friends' in London. But there are also other areas which have been less affected, e.g. Balham, from where Southern trains to Victoria have never run once every hour during rush hour, AFAIK and based on what local residents tell me.


There are many things I like about ED. Transport is not one of them.


So, no, it's not the same as everywhere else because:

1) areas not served by Southern have not witnessed a comparable level of disruption, disruption which, as this overtime ban shows, is not over yet

2) other areas served by Southern have been less affected


This doesn't mean ED is a terrible place to live, of course, but at least let's be honest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...